Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of negotiation
The importance of negotiation
Strengths and weaknesses of negotiation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of negotiation
A Job Offer Negotiation
The negotiations were successful! An agreement was reached and I got the job! This success was due in large part to the extensive planning prior to the negotiation with Robust Routers. Planning is critical to a successful outcome when negotiating (Lewicki, Saunders & Barry, 2011). This was especially true in negotiating this job offer as the bargaining mix included items as varied as state of residence, salary and even stock options. Also of great benefit was that both sides realized that the while the outcome was important the relationship would be protected and even strengthened as a result of our collaborative negotiation (Lewicki, Saunders & Barry, 2011).
Preparing for the Negotiation
In preparing of the negotiation, the job offer was dissected and each element was assigned a level of importance. The issues which were critical in importance were not relocating to Silicon Valley but remaining in Nashville and the annual salary. To a lesser degree of importance was the signing bonus and stock options. In addition, of least importance was the relocation bonus. With the issues prioritized, I was confident I would not lose perspective during negotiations and agree to less than an ideal contract.
Defining Interests
Issues had been defined and prioritized. The next step
…show more content…
The negotiation proceeded very well with what I perceived as minimal attempts to misrepresent or conceal information.. While Robust Routers would have preferred I work from their Silicon Valley location my willingness to travel there on a monthly basis as well as cost savings they would achieve by not allocating office space or support staff, along with my concession of their location bonus made the alternative solution of my residence being in Nashville quite viable. I was very pleased with the outcome of the negotiator as was Robust
...during the negotiation. Because they did not explicitly articulate their objectives to each other, the union and management did not reach a settlement that was mutually beneficial. I believe both teams prioritized “winning” over fulfilling their initial objectives. Therefore, I better understood how both teams suffered under pressure during the negotiation because they realized they could no longer rely on a zero-sum strategy. Moreover, I realized how important team cohesiveness is to the bargaining process. Both the union and management lacked basic cohesiveness among their team members and consequently exacerbated the contentious and emotional environment that they created during the negotiation. Nevertheless, under these circumstances I believe the union and management ultimately reached an adequate proposal that satisfied both sides of the bargaining table.
While there are not too many insurance companies in Canada, this gives RBC a competitive advantage, as they are able to customize packages for an individual for example, something that is competitive with the market. Because there is a lower supply of insurance companies, the supplier bargaining power is high in this case. RBC has as extensive portfolio for insurance types ranging from travel, auto, contents, home, life and disability insurance; furthermore strengthening their competitive advantages compared to other insurance companies who may not offer the same insurance types, or at a special premium. Another example that demonstrates RBC’s high bargaining powers is its ability to cross or up sell other packages to meet the needs of existing customers when it uses its customer service or call centre, as mentioned in the
Distributive bargaining consists of two parties in competition to maximize their share of a limited resource. In distributive bargaining, the goals of one party are in fundamental and direct conflict with the goals of the other party (Lewicki, Barry, & Saunders, 2011). In the negotiation over the job offer at Robust Routers, the resources being distributed were the items in the bargaining mix. As the human resources director, my goal was to gain more by giving less, and Joe’s goal was to gain more by receiving more of the company’s resources.
Planning for this negotiation was more difficult than the first negotiation in class. The first negotiation had a point system; therefore I knew what the maximum, minimum and average amount points were. Not only does the Texoil negotiation not have a point system, but there were two people on my side (sellers) and only one on the other side (buyer).
Fisher, Roger, William Ury, and Bruce Patton. Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books, 1991. Print.
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2005). Negotiation, Fifth Ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. ISBN-13: 9780073530369
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D.M., Barry B., (2010) Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases. 6th Ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York, NY
Negotiations styles are scholastically recognized as being broken down into two general categories and those are distributive bargaining styles and integrative negotiation styles. Distributive bargaining styles of negotiation are understood to be a competitive type of negotiation. “Distributive bargaining, also known as positional bargaining, negotiating zero-sum, competitive negotiation, or win-lose negotiation, is a type or style of negotiation in which the parties compete for the distribution of a fixed amount of value” (Business Blog Reviews, 2011). This type of negotiation skill or style approach might be best represented in professional areas such as the stock market where there is a fixed goal in mind or even in a garage sale negotiation where the owner would have a specific value of which he/she would not go below. In contrast, an integrative negotiation approach/style is that of cooperative bargaining, or win-win types ...
Spokane Industries has contracted Franklin Electronics for an 18 month product development contract. Franklin Electronics is new to using project management methodologies and has not been exposed to earned value management methodologies. Even though Franklin and Spokane have worked together in the past, they have mainly used fixed-price contracts with little to no stipulations. For this project, Spokane Industries is requiring Franklin Electronics to use formalized project management methodologies, earned value cost schedules, and schedules for reports and meetings. Since Franklin Electronics had no experience with earned value management, the cost accounting group was trained in the methodology in order to bid for the project.
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2007). Essentials of Negotiation. New York: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
... be ready and able to follow protocol and assist with the negotiation team as needed.
...s in stone. Rather, I will work towards a beneficial compensation package, if not a pay increase, then perhaps a higher title with concessions. The outcome of this negotiation should leave both sides satisfied. I will also research the department’s policy on compensation as well as reviewing my job description. Both of these are attainable in the Human Resources department. Furthermore, I will check websites that have listing of salaries and job descriptions to make sure my compensation is commensurate with my work. The scholarly article I will use to help plan out my tactics in my negotiation is “Dealcrafting: The Substance of Three-Dimensional Negotiations by David A. Lax, and James K. Sebenius”. This article explains that our understanding of negotiations are one dimensional. However, this new approach for a three dimensional negotiation can work in my favor.
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2010). Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin
I want to avoid failure at all cost, because it could hurt my career permanently, this is one of my first and biggest negotiations so far.