Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of unemployment
Consequences of unemployment
Cause and effect of joblessness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of unemployment
Despite a bureaucratic nightmare of programs designed to reduce poverty, the percentage of low-income Canadians has increased slightly from 12.8% in 2000 to 13.5% in 2013 (Younglai). If Canada does not fix its welfare system, in the future poverty will likely grow at a much faster rate because of job shortages caused by automation (Walker 6). This poverty has a host of undesirable effects. For example, studies show that child poverty negatively impacts health, academic achievement and future occupational status (“Children in Poverty” 2). For my argumentative research essay I will attempt to solve these issues by arguing that Canada should implement basic income. Basic income is an unconditional monthly payment given to every Canadian, …show more content…
I will analyze the ways poverty and economic inequality take a toll on one’s life, and how basic income will fight these issues. I will also investigate how basic income will allow for greater personal autonomy. For example, when Canadians have their essential needs covered by basic income they will be freer to pursue higher education or leave workplaces with poor working conditions. In this section I will also refute some common arguments against basic income and I will use statistics from basic income pilots to support my points. While improving the lives of Canadians is one positive aspect of basic income, another advantage is that it will strengthen the …show more content…
In an article on technological unemployment Walker explains, “Not only will we see a radical reduction in the need for human employment in manufacturing, distribution, transportation and agriculture, but in more “cerebral” professions as well. There are medical programs that outperform even experienced physicians in diagnosing disease” (6). While automation is inevitable, basic income will help ease the transition by reducing poverty and political unrest because those who cannot find a job will still earn a livable income. Although basic income will prepare society for technological unemployment, this is only one of the many benefits.
In order to solve several pressing economic issues and prepare for problems we expect to experience in the future, I argue that Canada should implement basic income. In my essay I will show how basic income will improve lives, strengthen the economy, and prepare society for technological unemployment. Poverty is a systemic issue, and as a result, it can only be effectively fought by reforming the system that created it. Through policy propositions like basic income we can begin to see what it will take to make the utopian dream of eradicating poverty a
In the article “The Case For Free Money” James Surowiecki expresses that Universal Basic Income is a tool to fight against poverty and help the economy and should be recognized as a helpful welfare program. Surowiecki starts the article with an example of a successful trial of U.B.I from the past called Mincome to show the idea in the real world. The experiment paved way for others to jump onto the idea of a U.B.I. Surowiecki goes on to show that U.B.I.s have been a popular idea to ending poverty with past American leaders and that today's people on both sides of thinking politically see the program as a way to fight poverty or end it. The article also explains that the idea of U.B.I.s is becoming more popular and America isn’t the only one
In Canada there is no official, government mandated poverty line. It is generally agreed that poverty refers to the intersection of low-income and other dimensions of ‘social exclusion’, including things such as access to adequate housing, essential goods and services, health and well-being and community participation. In Canada, the gap between the rich and poor is on the rise, with four million people struggling to find decent affordable housing, (CHRA) and almost 21% of children in BC are living in poverty it is crucial to address poverty (Stats Can). In class we have considered a number of sociological lens to examine poverty. Structural-functionalists maintain that stratification and inequality are inevitable and
Inequality in Canada is a growing problem. As income rises for the rich and remains the same for the poor, a gap is forming between Canada’s highest and lowest earners. This gap has sparked outrage by some, resulting in the Occupy Movement, and apathy in others. However, it can indeed be said that in Canada “the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.”
Why am I Poor? First Nations Child Poverty in Ontario. Canada: Best Start Resource Center,
Poverty is a serious issue in Canada needs to be addressed promptly. Poverty is not simply about the lack of money an individual has; it is much more than that. The World Bank Organization defines poverty by stating that, “Poverty is hunger. Poverty is lack of shelter. Poverty is being sick and not being able to see a doctor. Poverty is not having access to school and not knowing how to read. Poverty is not having a job, is fear for the future, living one day at a time”. In Canada, 14.9 percent of Canada’s population has low income as Statistics Canada reports, which is roughly about two million of Canadians in poverty or on the verge of poverty. In addition, according to an UNICEF survey, 13.3 percent of Canadian children live in poverty. If the government had started to provide efficient support to help decrease the rates of poverty, this would not have been such a significant issue in Canada. Even though the issue of poverty has always been affecting countries regardless of the efforts being made to fight against it, the government of Canada still needs to take charge and try to bring the percentage of poverty down to ensure that Canada is a suitable place to live. Therefore, due to the lack of support and social assistance from the government, poverty has drastically increased in Canada.
With the increase in funding, Canadian poverty within Aboriginal society would greatly decrease. The Government should be “proactive in giving aboriginal people in remote communities the support they need to move to areas where they can find jobs and education” (End First). That way, adults would be able to increase their income in order to have a much more fulfilling lifestyle. It is not only adults who need the financial aid, but also the community and children. In order to help, the Canadian Government should make sure more money is being made available for the First Nation education, social interactions such as community centres, and way of living including: housing, roads and availability of healthy food items. “...The poverty rate of status First Nations children living on reserves was triple that of non-indigenous children” (Hildebrandt). Aboriginal children across Canada need the help of Canadian Government in order to lose this poverty and be able to move ahead. “Persistent disadvantages faced by Canada’s aboriginal peoples in regard to education, employment, health and housing are well-documented/the staggering poverty faced by indigenous children is preventable” (Hildebrandt). With enough Government funding, Native children would be able to get better education, social skills and understanding of their traditions and culture. Schools, community centres
Poverty is the state for the majority of people in this world. In Canada there are over 4.5 million people living in poverty. Poverty is not only an issue in canada but an issue that needs to be focused on all over the world. About 14% of canada is living under the yearly income threshold which means they are living in poverty.
On January 19, 2016, Julie Delahanty published an article called “Billionaires on the Bus: Income Inequality and the Future of Poverty”. Julie Delahanty is an executive director of Oxfam Canada. The article is based on the Oxfam Briefing Paper, titled “the Richest 62 people as An Economy for the 1%”. The article explains that inequality is an important crisis that needs to be addressed, as it promotes cohesion and growth in all facets of the population and economy.
Poverty is a significant threat to women’s equality. In Canada, more women live in poverty than men, and women’s experience of poverty can be harsher, and more prolonged. Women are often left to bear more burden of poverty, leading to ‘Feminization of poverty’. Through government policy women inequality has resulted in more women and children being left in poverty with no means of escaping. This paper will identify some key aspects of poverty for Canadian women. First, by identifying what poverty entails for Canadian women, and who is more likely to feel the brunt of it. Secondly the discussion of why women become more susceptible to poverty through government policy and programs. Followed by the effects that poverty on women plays in society. Lastly, how we can reduce these effects through social development and policy.
...he nation’s prosperity as increases in benefits and wages to poor and working class Americans. Most of the gains due to the rise in the GDP in recent years wind up in the hands of the wealthiest of Americans. The increase in income inequality has cause stagnation in real wages among low skilled workers and has led to an increase in poverty. Unable to gain the education necessary to escape the cycle of low skilled jobs with little chance of upward mobility, children of parents who are in poverty stand a higher chance of being in poverty themselves. The solution to the problem of poverty is not simple; especially when it may involve changes in the way the U.S. labor market functions. However, as it stands now, failures of the labor market lead to higher rates of poverty, and unless the problem is addressed, we are unlikely to see a reduction in the U.S. poverty rate.
Poverty among Aboriginals entails poor living conditions on reserves, health and well-being struggles, and financially unstable families; relatively speaking to the majority of Aboriginals who are living in impoverished communities, these hardships usually commence in some way, shape, or form. The Canadian Feed the Children Charity (2017) notes that “Indigenous children in Canada are over two and a half times more likely to live in poverty than non-Indigenous children.” This number is quite high and is extremely unfortunate for children to have a potentially traumatic and unpleasant upbringing resulting in challenges throughout adolescent and adulthood years. Furthermore, statistics from a study conducted years before, in 2013 with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives state the rate at which Aboriginals in Canada are living in poverty. It was determined that 50 percent of status First Nations children in the Canadian context live in poverty based on the Low Income Measure (Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2013). With Manitoba being the highest percentage from this resource, sitting at 62 percent living in poverty, it is evident that Aboriginals in Canada are struggling
It is also important to question how and why income inequality occurs and why the social welfare system, a program which provides financial assistance to individuals and families in need, are insufficient in meeting the financial needs of individuals and families (Investopedia, 2010, “Social Welfare System Definition”). As a result of this questioning, throughout this essay, the effects of low income on one’s education, health and recreation will be explored. Individuals with low incomes do not have the same opportunities and access to services as middle and high income individuals. Therefore, it can be said that individuals with lower incomes face a discerning inequality with regards to their access and quality of health care, education and recreational activities. The effects of this inequality are harmful to low income individuals themselves, in addition to their quality of life, because they do not have the same opportunities and resources as higher income individuals do.
In today 's society, there is 1 in 7 people living in poverty which is costing Canadian citizens’ money as they are paying for taxes. There are many standpoints in which people examine the ways poverty affect society such as Marx’s conflict theory. Marx’s conflict theory goes over how social stratification being inevitable and how there is a class consciousness within people in the working class. Another way that poverty is scrutinized is by feminization. Feminization is the theory that will be explored throughout this essay. Poverty will be analyzed in this essay to determine the significance of poverty on the society and the implications that are produced.
Poverty is an undeniable problem in America. In 2014, 14.8 percent of the United States was in poverty (“Hunger and Poverty Fact Sheet”). There are more people in the United States than it seems that do not have their basic necessities. In an
In the current economy, there is no surprise for anxiety over whether employees will lose their jobs or not. Due to an increase of research and use for automation and machine learning, more and more workers are starting to antagonize new technology. In the research paper ‘Where have all the jobs gone?’ by well-known journalist Daniel Akst, the automation anxiety is not completely false, but it only focuses on one side; “Unemployment has been concentrating among those with little education or skill, while employment has been rising most rapidly in occupations generally considered to be the most skilled and require the most amount of education” (Akst). The rise of automation will mean a depletion of lower skilled jobs, which will cause an increase in education requirements to encourage more people to take up college and further education due to the introduction of more computer based jobs. Automation in the manufacturing business will have a positive effect; products can come out efficiently, quickly, accurately, and with lower costs. The higher amount of products coming out, the more demand and consumers are required. The wages will