Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Methods of experimentation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction The purpose of the experiment was to conclude the half-life of Barium-137m. Half-lives are the time required for half of the remaining radioisotope to decompose into another element or becoming stable by releasing gamma-rays. Half-lives happen when an element is excited or in a meta-state (gamma), has too many neutrons (beta negative) or protons (beta positive), or has too many nucleons (alpha). To determine the half-life, arrange the formula of the number of half-lives that have elapsed to make the half-life the subject in the equation. n=T/(t)1/2 → (t)1/2=T/n where n is the number of half-lives that elapsed, T is the amount of time the radioisotope has decayed and (t)1/2 is the half-life of the nuclei, this is to determine the half-life of the radioisotope. Barium-137m releases gamma rays, therefore, the nuclear decay equation will be Barium-137m → Barium-137 + (Y) Where (Y) will have no charge or mass. The radiation emitted is gamma and has ionize radiation …show more content…
properties, this is when atoms have so much energy that electrons become free, becoming positive ions. A Geiger-counter works when radiation interacts with the gas in the tube forming positive ions by ionization, the electrons are then attracted to the positive charge anode (inner conductor) with the atoms going towards the walls of the tube. The electrons then travel through wires making the electrical circuit and recombine with an ion, this is used to measure the quantity of radioactive particles that interact with it. Purpose The experiment was to conclude the half-life of barium-137m by using a Geiger counter. Equipment. Geiger-Muller tube and counter. Eluting solution. Cs-Ba mini generator. Safety glasses. Lab coat. Planchet. Stopwatch. Safety gloves. Safety When performing the experiment, at all times wear gloves and a lab coat, treat the substance with care as to not drop it otherwise it may affect the result. Once finished, leave the planchet on the sample holder and leave it for the instructor Method When the equipment has been set up, turn on the Geiger counter without the radioactive substance near it and for one-minute record the background radiation, recording twice and using the average would yield a more accurate result. When finished, acquire the radioactive substance and place it on top of a planchet placing it near the Geiger counter tube and start recording, *record from the Geiger counter for 10 seconds * and then momentarily stop for 20 seconds before repeating. Once finished, place all the equipment to the designated area placed by the instructor. With the recordings, finalize the data by taking counts per 10 seconds to Counts Per Minute (CPM) and then subtract the average radiation background from the radioisotope. Results and calculations Discussion. As displayed above, the time for the experimental half-life is approximately 160s, according to Pasco.com and the University of Tennessee the half-life of barium - 137m 156s or 153s respectively.
This margin of error could have been a result of not immediately recording when the radioactive substance was placed onto the planchet and restarting the recording multiple times. Basic steps of procedure could have avoided this as there were missing instruction sheets within the group. However, the graph was only approximating the half-life and does not perfectly indicate the time of the half life, but according to results the amount of Bq suddenly increases or decreases, this could be due to either the amounts of background radiation being interacted with the tube, or not stopping the recording in perfect sequence or perhaps both. This could have been prevented if there were less background radiation by providing larger spaces and if the recordings were timed accurately by being operated by
AIs.
There were no significant error factors that may have affected the arrangement of the lab experiment. Everything went smoothly with relative ease.
Other human errors could have affected the results, such as not inverting the plate before putting it into incubation would not allow for bacterial growth. Not pipetting the tube up and down to mix the bacteria that settled at the bottom of the tube before starting the Gram Stain would not allow for an accurate reading because there wouldn’t be many bacteria on the slide. Passing the slide over the bunsen burner too many times, hence killing the bacteria and not allowing for a Gram Stain. If this experiment had to be redone, one improvement would be to allow for more than one plate without a point deduction. Unexpected human errors might interfere with a person’s results.
Physicists started to realize that stable nuclei can be converted to unstable nuclei. Through such process, they discovered that heavy nuclei can undergo nuclear fission. While testing, they added a neutron to an isotope of Uranium 235. This resulted Uranium 235 to become unstable and break down into Barium and Krypton, releasing two to three more neutrons. The breakdown of Uranium 235 is called “fission”.
In this experiment, there were several objectives. First, this lab was designed to determine the difference, if any, between the densities of Coke and Diet Coke. It was designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of several lab equipment measurements. This lab was also designed to be an introduction to the LabQuest Data and the Logger Pro data analysis database. Random, systematic, and gross errors are errors made during experiments that can have significant effects to the results. Random errors do not really have a specific cause, but still causes a few of the measurements to either be a little high or a little low. Systematic errors occur when there are limitations or mistakes on lab equipment or lab procedures. These kinds of errors cause measurements to be either be always high or always low. The last kind of error is gross errors. Gross errors occur when machines or equipment fail completely. However, gross errors usually occur due to a personal mistake. For this experiment, the number of significant figures is very important and depends on the equipment being used. When using the volumetric pipette and burette, the measurements are rounded to the hundredth place while in a graduated cylinder, it is rounded to the tenth place.
...to establish the tolerance level for radium. The center for Human Radiobiology was established in 1968 with the primary purpose of examining living dial painters.
Possible sources of error in this experiment include the inaccuracy of measurements, as correct measurements are vital for the experiment.
Discussion: The percent of errors is 59.62%. Several errors could have happened during the experiment. Weak techniques may occur.
One possible source of experimental error could be not having a solid measurement of magnesium hydroxide nor citric acid. This is because we were told to measure out between 5.6g-5.8g for magnesium hydroxide and 14g-21g for citric acid. If accuracy measures how closely a measured value is to the accepted value and or true value, then accuracy may not have been an aspect that was achieved in this lab. Therefore, not having a solid precise measurement and accurate measurement was another source of experimental error.
in the experiment of the Atomic Wight of the Element Silver. We react excess amount of copper with silver nitrate solution. To determine the amount of copper reacted and silver that is produced. The first thing that we did was rinsed 150 ml beaker with distilled water. Second, we dispense 10.00 ml of silver nitrate into rinsed beaker. Then we added 100 ml of distilled water to the beaker. Third we obtain a precut copper wire and then winded around large wide mouth test tube to produce a helix or coil of wire. After that we weighed the wire which is 2.1290g in balance number 5. Fourth, we placed the copper wire in the beaker containing dilute silver nitrate solution at 11:30 and then we taped on the copper wire to dislodge the silver metal into
Aim - The aim of this experiment was to find out the rate of a
A known solution of Na2SO4 was made and the unknown solution was made. Both solutions were mixed with BaCl2 twice to create a reaction. The solutions were all put into test tubes to be put into the centrifuge to separate out the precipitate, NaCl. The precipitate was then removed from the tubes and put on filter paper to dry. Once they dried the filter paper with precipitate was weighed. Then the mass of the filter paper was subtracted from the total weight, to find the mass of the precipitate, shown in Table 3. The mass of NaCl precipitate was used to find the amount of NaCl present. Then the amount of NaCl was used to determine the amount of Na2SO4 present. Then this number was used to determine the experimental molar mass of Na2SO4. The experimental molar mass was compared to the actual molar mass. All the values of these calculations are shown in Table 5. The actual molar mass and experimental molar mass were very close and resulted in a percent yield of
“The half-life of a radioisotope is the time required for half the atoms in a given sample to undergo radioactive decay; for any particular radioisotope, the half-life is independent of the initial amount of...
W. Gurney, and Edward U. Condon, shows that in beta decay a negatively charged particle, known as a beta particle and to be identical to an electron, the nucleus of an atom emits it, thereby increasing the atomic number of the nucleus by one unit. Atoms moving from a higher state of energy to a lower one by beta decay, which also violates the Conservation of Mass Laws. This initialed led to massive research in the 1930s. Enrico Fermi worked out in a short time an elegant theory of beta decay based on the idea that a neutron in the nucleus transforms or decays into three particles: a proton, an electron (beta particle), and a neutrino. Enrico Fermi’s theory of beta decay won him much respect in the scientific community and is one of his great celebrated works. Theory of Beta Decay helped revolutionize physics into a new understanding with Enrico Fermi’s
Weight the crucible and calculate the weight difference from before and now. The calculated weight difference is the weight of the Barium Sulfate precipitate.
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.