More handpicked essays just for you.
How did the Mongols effect history
Bartleby.com the rise and impact of genghis khan
Essays on genghis khan AND HOW HE SHAPED THE WORLD GOOD AND BAD
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Barbarians: How barbaric were the “barbarians”
Barbarians the infamous term for someone who was uncultured and evil, but what does it really mean to be a barbarian and how did it originate. It all started with Mongols, illiterate nomadic people originating from South russia near Vienna(Intro doc). Their reputation is not pretty just as the document says, much of the world called them barbarian from the greek word “barbos” meaning foreigner(Intro doc), but this word evolved as it was associated with the mongols. By the 1200’s this word started to mean something else, it represented the mongols savageness and evil form of life; ravaging and killing for riches and loot.
The mongolian history is hard to trust since they were conquering multitudes
…show more content…
at the time, they had already conquered in their prime Korea, Poland, Vietnam, and Syria (Into Doc).That brings to question, how could an illiterate group of hunter and gathering nomads with no knowledge of mining or metalwork conquer suc progressive nations.
It was under the leader Genghis Khan, a military strategist focused on strategy. Genghis Khan ordained that the army should be organised in such a way that ten men should beset one man and he is what we call a captain (Doc C). If they were so “barbaric” why were they so disciplined in organization and strategy to furthermore their reign and conquest. Even more GenGhis Khan set out a form with military details and rules, the document says that all men over the age of fourteen were expected to undertake military duty, only …show more content…
physicians, undertakers and priests were exempt (Doc B). They also valued medicine and reason, this is represented in (doc B) where it states that a soldiers equipment began with a silk undershirt, if he was unlucky enough to be hit with an arrow that would pierce the armor it would be unlikely that it would penetrate the silk, even so if it should penetrate the silk undershirt the cloth would make it easier for the [physician to remove the arrow without tearing further tissue and skin.This shows the value they had for military strategy organization and health, these are not signs of a barbaric society, yet we haven't taken a look to what they had accomplished with this knowledge. They might not have been a savage community at first hand but when we dig a little deeper we see the true colors of their lifestyle and what it meant for any bordering country.
When we compare Genghis Khan to other military strategist who were also known by their ruthlessness we see that they were no match for his gruesome tactics and unmerciful reign. We see that compared to Alexander The Great, or Adolf Hitler Genghis khan conquered three times more in square miles (Doc A). He killed over 3 million people varying from Bukhara,Merv, NIshapur, Herat, and Baghdad (Doc E). As we can see he used his military supremacy against them often people saying that his conquest were so bloody and gruesome they led to the slaughter of thousands at time causing the street to skink of human grease and flesh (Intro
Doc) Even though he was a conqueror with a bad reputation he still had some humanity in his “heart”.Genghis Khan more often than not gave kingdoms a chance to peacefully submit to the Mongol rule, but he never hesitate to attack any society that resisted. One of his most famous campaigns of revenge came in 1219, after the Shah of the Khwarezmid Empire broke a treaty with the Mongols (10 Things You May Not Know About Genghis Khan) They were a great society filled with progressive ideology. They were Hunters, Gatherers, Conquerors, and Traders. They traded with china's prominent technological advances and persian military tools. In conclusion the term “barbarian” is in the eye of the beholder. The term can be used as freely as needed for it is your own unique opinion, but for me the mongolians advance upon other progressive countries was amusing and amazing.
The people that the Mongol Empire overthrew were the only ones to suffer under Genghis Khan’s homicidal ways. Khan’s army was forcibly traumatized under maniacal methods as well: “Genghis Khan ordained that the army should be organized in such a way that over ten men should beset one man and he is what we call a captain of ten. [...] When they are in battle, if one or two or even more out of a group of ten run away, all are put to death; and if a whole group of ten flees, the rest of the group of a hundred are all put to death, if they do not flee too. [...] Likewise if one or two or more go forward boldly to the fight, then the rest of the ten are put to death if they do not follow and, if one or more of the ten are captured, their companions are put to death if they do not rescue them.” (doc B) Every group of ten was expected to perform at a homog...
In the years 1777 to 1778, while General George Washington was settled in Valley Forge with his forces, the Continental Army was falling apart. It became difficult for Washington to keep leading when his soldiers kept retreating. My position is a soldier in the army who will be allowed to leave in one month, but I will not leave. The soldiers at Valley Forge in 1777 and 1778 should have stayed. The Continental Army needed everyone they could keep, the death toll was low, and George Washington was a fantastic leader.
To start, the mongols were able to used brutal and strategic military tactics that helped them conquer more than 4,800,000 miles of land. The Mongols leader “Genghis Khan” was a very smart and strategic leader. He organized his army into groups of ten, hundred, and one thousand. If such groups runs away or flees, the entire group was put to death. Genghis Khans army was able to succeed in conquering land due to horses. His army
Despite the fact that Mongolians were prejudiced against other cultures, they were, in fact, not barbaric but rather civilized because of their gender equality of people and how advanced their cities were. In The Book of Ser Marco Polo, Polo tells us how beautiful and well protected the city was like. For instance, the text explains how the city was protected by two great powerful walls surrounding the entire city. Only well advanced and civilized people can do such a thing such as creating an enormous wall. If the Mongolians were barbaric they wouldn’t have even thought of protection.. In Addition, the way the city looked also proved that they were civilized and not barbaric.
Firstly, the Mongol society was viewed as merciful and fair-minded. According to Ala-ad-Din Ata-Malik Juvaini, a Persian historian who served the Mongols as the governor of Baghdad in the 1200’s, the Mongols would not use excessive punishments when collecting taxes from their tributaries. Likewise, Korean scholars who documented the battle of Kuju between the Mongols and the Koreans in the 15th century reported that after the battle an elderly Mongol general recognized the Korean military leaders for their persistence and courage in their refusal to surrender. The general said he believed that these leaders would become distinguished rulers of the state, and in fact it came to pass. Another instance ...
Firstly, they were taught and trained from a very young age. All men over the age of fourteen were expected to undertake military duty (DOC B). By training their soldiers so young, by the time they were ready to fight, they were amazingly fast and strong which helped to conquer other lands. Second, the Mongols were very well organized which helped with communication. Organization flourished under Genghis Khan, the leader of the Mongols, control because he instituted new rules. For example, “Genghis Khan ordained that the army should be organized in such a way that over ten men should be organized in such a way that over ten men should beset one man and he is what we call a captain of ten” (DOC C). By instituting standardized methods and rules of battle to create organization, they were able to work together, as one, as a team. Everybody was on the same page, and nobody left people behind and fled. This organization united them and brought them to move like each other, learn from one another. Lastly, the Mongols were always prepared, another characteristic that added to why they were able to conquer so much land. When soldiers are prepared, they can be confident and brave. The Mongol army needed that advantage. So soldiers were equipped for travel. They were expected to carry cooking pots, dried meat, a water bottle, files for sharpening arrows, a needle ad thread and other
The Mongols were barbaric because of their cruelty. In document 4 it states, “They then drove all the survivors, men and women, out onto the plain; and… it was commanded that the town should be laid waste in such a manner that the site could be ploughed upon; and that … not even cats and dogs should be left alone” (Document C). This document shows they would kill everything that
When the word “Mongol” is said I automatically think negative thoughts about uncultured, barbaric people who are horribly cruel and violent. That is only because I have only heard the word used to describe such a person. I have never really registered any initial information I have been taught about the subject pass the point of needing and having to know it. I felt quite incompetent on the subject and once I was given an assignment on the book, Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern Age, I was very perplexed for two reasons. One I have to read an outside book for a class that already requires a substantial amount of time reading the text, and secondly I have to write a research paper in History. I got over it and read the book, which surprisingly enough interested me a great deal and allow me to see the Moguls for more than just a barbaric group of Neanderthals, but rather a group of purpose driven warriors with a common goal of unity and progression. Jack Weatherford’s work has given me insight on and swayed my opinion of the Mongols.
They struck fear into their enemies eyes with their gruesome affect and fierce actions. They showed no mercy. The Mongols were also known for their surprise attack which spread to other armies making it a keen warfare used all around the world. This battle tactic consisted of a group of men who are fighting out on the battlefield and they begin to retreat only to draw the enemy into a trap. The enemy runs into a rain of arrows as the rest of the men are hiding off to the side with loaded weapons, and fierce ground fighters ready for combat. This is one key that the Mongols had to help them conquer
The Mongols could be considered barbarians because of the violent and barbaric war tactics they used to instill fear in people. They often took advantage of their organized army to carry out many of these military tactics. When the Mongols attacked places such as fortresses, they would first surround it, breaking up their army into groups and periodically switched them so that they could attack day and night while the fortresses inhabitants tired themselves out trying to protect themselves (Doc 3). When they were not able to capture the fortress like this, they would take the fat of enemies they killed, and, after melting it, they would catapult it onto houses and set fire to it; these fires were nearly impossible to put out (Doc 3). The Mongols would also often take over entire cities, slaying all its inhabitants and burning it to the ground after taking any valuables. ...
The military exploits of the Mongols under Ghengis Khan as well as other leaders and the ruthless brutality that characterized the Mongol conquests have survived in legend. The impact of the invasions can be traced through history from the different policies set forth to the contributions the Mongols gave the world. The idea of the ruthless barbarian’s intent upon world domination will always be a way to signify the Mongols. Living steadfast upon the barren steppe they rode out of Mongolia to pursue a better life for their people.
Genghis Khan, as it is well-acknowledged, is renowned for governing the extensively immense Mongol Empire. Despite the common argument that he indiscriminately (done at random or without careful judgement―by definition) slaughtered millions of people, Genghis Khan aspired to conquer new territories and, in accordance to their religion, animism, “the sky god made it their goal to unite the land under one sword.” How else would he have done the preceding? Just as the Mongol Government Official stated, “war is inevitable,” especially when capitulation is refused. Moreover, Genghis Khan noted that peace usually follows surrender. Though Prince Kiev attempted to confute the aforementioned, he was mistaken when he said that “war sparked between the two peoples” as a result of an attempt at peace. In response, Genghis Khan’s negation included that war arose as a consequence of their mistrust of him and the denial of a viable peace
The relationships of the Axumite Empire with the world outside its borders was almost entirely based on trade and military conquest. The key location of Axum in the horn of Africa, which is now Ethiopia, near The Red Sea and the Indian Sea made Axum one of the most important trading posts of the time. In the documents “The Periplus of the Erythraen Sea”, “The Christian Topography” by Cosmas and “Inscription on a Stone Throne” The authors describe different features of the trading practices and military campaigns of Axum that had a significant impact in the neighboring empires. From the grandeur of the Axumite port Adulis and the products that were available for import and export. To how they conducted the trading of materials and resources for gold with the neighboring African peoples. And military conquests that expanded the wealth of Axum.
Though the Mongols were brutal in their campaign to conquer, the conquests of Timur-i Lang were extremely harsh, much more so than that of the Mongols. He is heralded as one of the toughest rulers of the time, and he expanded the empire through harsh measures. Rather than the Mongols, who post-conquest were somewhat peaceful, Timur-i Lang was harmful to those he conquered in Asia. He slaughtered villages and burned them down. Most likely because of his rule and the vastness of the area he ruled, the Mongol empire was not united and failed to garner any big trading network that it previously had. Overall, Timur-i Lang was much more brutal than the rule of any other Mongol Khan, especially during the conquests and after the conquests. His zeal to get more land prevented any conquered peoples to live peacefully under his leadership.
Genghis Khan’s main focuses were political and economic. During his reign he built a strong and well organized army because his army always have to be in pursuit of expanding his empire, and he made an agreement under international law (treaties) with other empires to promote trade throughout Eurasia. He organized his army into units of ten, with multiple military strategies like the use of catapults and gunpowder, also Genghis Khan used his army to break down city walls to be able to attack the enemies. He spent most of his rule on horseback, riding off to distant places to conquer new lands and expand his empire.He was prove to be a genius in military and political category. To keep his citizen under control he need to create a rule. Genghis Khan made a code of law called the Great Law, which was supreme over all the people in the Mongol empire, this code of law were also applied to Genghis Khan himself to create fairness