Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Battle tactics of Genghis Khan that we use today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Battle tactics of Genghis Khan that we use today
Kublai Khan and Genghis Khan has many things in common but at the same time they both have their own characteristics that made them who they are. Although separated by a span of over 50 years a lifetime in the days of the Mongol empire they each helped creating and shaping the modern society the world has today. Such rulers had both similarities and differences in how they gain and ruled over their army and citizens also what they used their government power for.
Genghis Khan’s main focuses were political and economic. During his reign he built a strong and well organized army because his army always have to be in pursuit of expanding his empire, and he made an agreement under international law (treaties) with other empires to promote trade throughout Eurasia. He organized his army into units of ten, with multiple military strategies like the use of catapults and gunpowder, also Genghis Khan used his army to break down city walls to be able to attack the enemies. He spent most of his rule on horseback, riding off to distant places to conquer new lands and expand his empire.He was prove to be a genius in military and political category. To keep his citizen under control he need to create a rule. Genghis Khan made a code of law called the Great Law, which was supreme over all the people in the Mongol empire, this code of law were also applied to Genghis Khan himself to create fairness
…show more content…
in society. Because his main focuses where political, economic, and military. There were no advances in mathematics, science, or medicine, although there were some use of engineering in the military. However, Kublai Khan ways of controlling and conquering are so different from Genghis Khan way, but at the same time it was significant. Unlike Genghis Khan, Kublai Khan’s main focuses were intellectual and economic. Kublai Khan conquered China in a completely different way than Genghis Khan did, he listen to public opinion by making himself appear Chinese. He took a Chinese name, built a capital with Chinese design, and set up a administration. He also allowed educated people to take part in government administrations, this way the government can be really efficient. Kublai Khan also encouraged the writing of dramas and playwrights, he raised the social status of singers and other performers, and he also built a theater so that actors and performers would have places to perform. Because so many parts of the Mongol empire used different calendars, he create a massive printing system so calendars and almanacs could be circulated. This was important because it create a smoothly functioning calendar that could be used throughout the empire. A series of observatories for watching the astronomical bodies were built all across China. As you can see Kublai Khan conquered new land without violence which reduce a risk of getting attack or create enemies. On the contrary, Genghis Khan way of conquering new land are more aggressive that Kublai’s method but this risk of creating enemies and a risk of being invaded. Even though there are a lot of difference between them but at the same time they are similarities among them. Genghis Khan and Kublai Khan were both extremely powerful and dominant leaders of the Mongol empire.
They were similar because they both have strong political tactics that allow them to take control over a vast empire of hundreds of thousands of people, although their tactics in political were different. A reason for this similarity was the heavy emphasis and early training in military strategy that was part of Mongol culture. As well as they also encouraged a vast system of trade and economics, because both Genghis Khan and Kublai Khan wanted to bring new wealth into their
empires. Even Though there period of conquering were separated for more than 50 years. They were known as extremely powerful and influential leaders of the Mongol empire. Because of their style or method for both conquering new land and controlling a large amount of citizen were different in many ways, makes them unique and always ahead in the battle and at the same time they were both significant. But there political tactical and ability to control such a vast empire make them similar. Also they were both had religious tolerance towards most religions for the empire people.
Between the early 1200's and the mid 1300's the Mongol Empire, led by Genghis Khan, took control of around 9,300,000 square miles of Eurasia. Genghis Khan first started conquering neighboring clans before setting his sight on the rest of the world. When they would conquer a city, the Mongols would give the city a chance to surrender and if they declined and the Mongols succeeded in conquering them, then all of the citizens would be slaughtered. Under Genghis Khan, the Mongol Empire grew to encompass Central Asia, parts of the Middle East, and east to the borders of the Korean Peninsula. In 1227, Genghis Khan died, which led to the empire being divided into four khanates that would be ruled by his sons and grandsons. Genghis Khan's descendants
The Aztec and Mongol empires were large, expansive realms that shared many similarities in their rise to power, but also had some differences. The Aztec and Mongol Empire's rise to power were similar politically in that they both conquered neighboring nations, similar socially in that their social structures both emphasized warriors, but were different economically in that the Aztecs relied on tributes from conquered lands to fund their expansion whereas the Mongols destroyed lands they conquered to prevent challenges to their power.
Genghis Kahn conquered a total of 4,860,000 square miles. That’s more than two times the amount lassoed by Alexander the Great, the second most successful conquerer. The amount of land that Genghis Kahn conquered is over one million square miles greater than the entire area of the United States, Alaska and Hawaii not included. (doc A) The pain inflicted by Khan and his army during their conquests was unfathomably merciless, demented, and “barbaric.” His victories resulted from actions and inhumane methods. (doc D and doc F) The law code he enforced was ruthless and unyielding. (doc K and doc N) Very few of his successful methods were harmless. (doc L) Enormous inhabitant deaths occurred. (doc E and doc I) The only religions acknowledged were monotheistic. (doc H, doc G, and doc M) The Mongol Empire was infinitely more barbaric than any other empire seen before the thirteenth century.
To start, the mongols were able to used brutal and strategic military tactics that helped them conquer more than 4,800,000 miles of land. The Mongols leader “Genghis Khan” was a very smart and strategic leader. He organized his army into groups of ten, hundred, and one thousand. If such groups runs away or flees, the entire group was put to death. Genghis Khans army was able to succeed in conquering land due to horses. His army
Firstly, they were taught and trained from a very young age. All men over the age of fourteen were expected to undertake military duty (DOC B). By training their soldiers so young, by the time they were ready to fight, they were amazingly fast and strong which helped to conquer other lands. Second, the Mongols were very well organized which helped with communication. Organization flourished under Genghis Khan, the leader of the Mongols, control because he instituted new rules. For example, “Genghis Khan ordained that the army should be organized in such a way that over ten men should be organized in such a way that over ten men should beset one man and he is what we call a captain of ten” (DOC C). By instituting standardized methods and rules of battle to create organization, they were able to work together, as one, as a team. Everybody was on the same page, and nobody left people behind and fled. This organization united them and brought them to move like each other, learn from one another. Lastly, the Mongols were always prepared, another characteristic that added to why they were able to conquer so much land. When soldiers are prepared, they can be confident and brave. The Mongol army needed that advantage. So soldiers were equipped for travel. They were expected to carry cooking pots, dried meat, a water bottle, files for sharpening arrows, a needle ad thread and other
Mongol rule between nations both varied and shared many similarities. Both China and Russia were incorporated into the ever expanding Mongol empire. The massive expanses of land each civilization contained would help to increase the power the Mongols had. This would also help them to control more of Eurasia. Many people were killed during the brutal wars the Mongols started to try and conquer land. They were power hungry and destroyed everything that got in the way of their conquests. The Mongols never assimilated into neither Chinese nor Russian culture. This led to rebellions against the Mongols in both Chinese and Russian areas.
...s misused their common material interest to overcome the political fault diving them, while giving up political unity they had conserved a combined cultural and commercial empire. The connection that the Mongol Empire relied on was the quick and constant motion of people, goods, and information around the empire.
To start there are their similarities. The biggest similarity of the two is that both empires survived into the 20th century while their other contemporaries did not. Secondly the two empires were alike in their strong armies. Their armies which were made strong most notably by their rulers, the Russian Peter the Great and the Ottoman Suleiman the Magnificent, and a further but related
Unlike Attila, Genghiz Khan also known as Temujin and founder of the Mongol Empire in 1206, fought his way to the top after being exiled from his people at an early age. He was known to be just because he ensure that the spoils were distributed evenly among his warriors and he refrained his warriors from harming the innocents without his permission. Due to his fairness, he lost some friends that fought along with him to retrieve his wife, which the Merkits kidnapped. He was very diplomatic and laid down a solid rule for his army to abide by. He also came up with a good defense mechanism of dividing his army into “arbans (10 people), zuun...
The Mongols; a vicious and destructive military force, feared throughout its empire and under the rule of one man, Chinggis Khan. This picture of the Mongols and their empire is one often painted by our modern society. However, much of what we think we know about the Mongols has been exaggerated and biased from the point of view of the people that were conquered. In reality, the Mongols, although at times violent and destructive, bore many similarities in tactics and practices to the classical empires that had preceded them. They were not just simple barbaric savages looking to destroy whatever they could. They were a people united for a common purpose, trying to achieve it the same way that prior civilizations had done so: military force. Even though a Western perspective may find the actions of the Mongols objectionable, it must be understood that this was not a Western society, nor did it house the same values as one. The Mongols were not the destructive barbarians they are often made out to be, but rather an effective military force working for unification.
...erfect as they seemed and Genghis and Alex both couldn’t hold together empires very well. As far as differences, Alexander the Great’s empire started in Greece and conquered mostly Europe while Genghis Kahn’s empire started in Asia and spread throughout Asia and Europe. After death, Genghis Kahn had grandchildren who took over his legacy where as Alexander didn’t. In general, the Mongols conquered more land then the Greeks making them a bit more powerful and more influential.
The occurance of the dynastic cycle in these two dynastys was similar and differnet in many ways. Both empires were
Genghis Khan was born clutching a blood clot in his fist, foretelling of the bloodshed and violence he would unleash on the world while ultimately achieving the goal of creating the largest contiguous empire in history. His personal struggle is well outside the scope of this discussion. I will, however, cover how Genghis exemplified the qualities of a visionary leader by his use of technology, long range planning, and inspirational motivation. Contrary to historians in the Middle East, I also present that Genghis Khan was an ethical leader as shown by his authentic leadership style that embodied idealized influence and based his leadership decisions squarely on merit. Finally, I intend to convey how Genghis’ leadership example resonates with me and relates to my personal and professional decisions in life. To begin, we will explore how Genghis was a visionary leader.
Both the glorious empires, the Mali established in 1230 by the founder Sundiata and Mongol founded by Genghis Khan in 1206 contain much more differences than similarities. When the rise of the Mali and Mongol Empires began to arise they had significant effects towards the areas in which they were located. Some similarities include religious tolerance and cultural growth by trade. Some differences include violence methods and religion. Even though both of these superlative empires arose in difference regions they shared some common views as well.
Though different in many ways imaginable both civilizations art and history has survived and left a significant mark in the history of time. Both Ancient civilization were remarkable in their devotion to their religion, the influential contributions to neighboring regions, and the mark they left in art, architecture, and science. Although different in many aspects, the greatest similarities shared by both civilization is that they reigned and lasted longer than other civilizations.