Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sweatshops in third world countries
The effects of sweatshops
Effect of Sweatshop
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sweatshops in third world countries
My research topic is about sweatshops. Sweatshops are factories where workers are subjected to poor and potentially hazardous conditions for low pay. Over the span of the year, I want to continue to explore this topic. My goal is figure out a way to improve the conditions of the workers in these factories with minimal damage to our economy. I’ll do this by answering my questions, adding my prior knowledge about the issue to new information, and keeping in mind the people involved and influenced by this issue. I found out about this issue when looking up videos for Human Geography. A suggested video popped up about these sweatshops in Bangladesh. I became interested in the topic, and did research on it. I looked up companies and how their …show more content…
clothes were made at stopchildlabor.org. I looked up more videos one the topic. One was particularly compelling; it was the story of an eleven-year-old girl who had worked at the sweatshops, and suffered poor working conditions as well as abusive supervisors. All of these sources gave me a general idea of the issue. I find this issue worthwhile and interesting because it has a global impact, and is an issue that many are unaware of. Everybody can agree that the conditions of sweatshops aren’t ethical, nor is the low pay given to workers. Yet, they are still around because people all over the world can buy products at a low price. This is what makes this issue a difficult one to deal with; it affects everybody in some way. While I don’t know much about this topic, I have a general idea of the issue.
Sweatshops are similar to factories; however, they involve workers repeating the same tasks for many hours. Sometimes, they have to work overtime into the morning. They often work in rooms with no air conditioning and possibly are in an environment that is hazardous to their health. They do all of this for little pay. In the sweatshop I watched a documentary on, workers, mainly women, were often beaten for not doing their job correctly, or for working to slow. On the other hand, people in countries such as the United States, as well as large businesses, benefit greatly from this. Cheap prices on clothing as well as additional wealth for businesses are all results of these sweatshops. Additionally, it boosts the economy of first world countries such as our own. I want to address the issue considering both …show more content…
aspects. Although I learned some significant information from my research, there is still a lot I want to learn. There are key questions I want to answer in order to propose a solution. One of these questions is how widespread these sweatshops are. I want to know where they exist. This is a crucial question that can give me a starting point as to where the issue takes place. Once I know that, I can further research why this area of the world is targeted, and how our clothes get from there to here. Another one of my key questions is who do these sweatshops benefit, and who do they detriment? If I know what parties benefit from this commerce, I can better access why they these sweatshops are still around, and which companies and governments would need to change before the conditions in these sweatshops change. Using my previous research, I can partially answer my main questions. It seems like sweatshops are located in third world countries, especially where there aren’t many laws governing working conditions. Additionally, it seems like many of these countries are in Asia. They don’t appear to be widespread amongst continents, but they don’t appear to be contained in one country either. My other question was who do sweatshops benefit, and who do they detriment. Right now, I assume the sweatshops are detrimental to the workers, who work for low pay in hazardous conditions. I know that large companies benefit from sweatshops, because they receive product at a cheaper price. A lot of times, this benefits consumers as well, because they can also receive clothes at a lower price. In order to finish answering my questions, I need to gather more information. I need to look at sites that are already working for change (e.g. stopchildlabor.org). However, I also need to find out information on businesses, and how their clothes are made. I need to research why some people aren’t as apt to change. To find answers to questions like these, I can use websites like pro-con.org. By using these websites and others like them, I can get a more complete set of information about this topic In order to write an affective paper, I need to know which audiences might be interested in my ideas on this issue.
Of course there are the people who know about this issue and advocate for change. But there are also those who don’t know about this issue, but may still be interested. I think that people who have an ethnicity tied to any of the places where sweatshops are prominent would be more sympathetic to the issue because they have a relation to that place. Another group of people who I think would be interested in this issue are women. Many of the exploited workers at these sweatshops are women, so one may feel a closer connection to those workers. Lastly, families with children may be interested in this issue. Many workers in sweatshops are eighteen, nineteen, and twenty. In the documentary that I watched, girls as young as eleven had the job of cutting frayed ends off of shirts. Families, (especially parents), may be interested in this issue because they have children, and can more accurately imagine what that would be
like. In order to introduce this idea to people to people who don’t know about it, or perhaps don’t have any connection to it, I need to introduce it in a way that is relatable to everybody. Clothing is one way to do this. Everybody wears clothes, and clothes from department stores have a tag on the back saying where they were made. Many of these tags have the names of the countries where they were made on them, and many of the countries on these clothes are third world countries, like Bangladesh and El Salvador. This simple idea, and ideas similar to this one, can spark interest in the topic by relating it to everyday life. Simply informing people of the issue is not enough to change the system. There are many decision makers and other influential people who are effected or can affect this this issue. Heads of large clothing companies definitely affect and are affected by this issue. They are ones who rely on the sweatshops and keep them going. Another influential person who can have an effect on this issue it the President of the United States. He is in charge of creating laws, and he could play a huge role in fixing this issue. The governments of the countries where sweatshops are located perhaps play one of the largest roles in this situation. They are the ones in charge of governing how the sweatshops are run. There are influential people that may side with me on this topic, while other influential people may not. My allies on this topic are likely to be people who relate to it in some way. As I discussed earlier, people that are ethnically tied to a place, or people who can relate to the workers (e.g. women), are likely to feel more of a connection to this issue, and be on my side. However, others who benefit from this commerce in some way are likely you be against me (e.g. large corporations) In conclusion, this is a broad topic that, after research, I hope to find an applicable solution to. I want to know more about this issue, and how to effectively advocate for change. Through a combination of new and acquired knowledge, as well as an idea on how to propose my ideas, I can accomplish this.
It is often said that products made in sweatshops are cheap and that is why people buy those products, but why is it behind the clothes or shoes that we wear that make sweatshops bad? In the article Sweat, Fire and Ethics by Bob Jeffcott is trying to persuade the people and tell them how sweatshops are bad. Bob Jeffcott supports the effort of workers of the global supply chains in order to win improved wages and good working conditions and a better quality of life of those who work on sweatshops. He mentions and describes in detail how the conditions of the sweatshops are and how the people working in them are forced to long working hours for little money. He makes the question, “we think we can end sweatshops abuses by just changing our individual buying habits?” referring to we can’t end the abuses that those women have by just stopping of buying their products because those women still have to work those long hours because other people are buying their product for less pay or less money.
The controversial issue of sweatshops is one often over looked by The United States. In the Social Issues Encyclopedia, entry # 167, Matt Zwolinski tackles the issues of sweatshops. In this article Matt raises a question I have not been able to get out of my head since I have begun researching this topic, “ are companies who contract with sweatshops doing anything wrong?” this article goes on to argue that the people who work in the sweatshops willingly choose to work there, despite the poor environment. Many people in third world countries depend on the sweatshops to earn what they can to have any hopes of surviving. If the sweatshops were to shut down many people would lose their jobs, and therefore have no source of income. This may lead people to steal and prostitution as well. this article is suggesting that sweatshops will better the economy by giving people a better job than what they may have had. Due to this the companies contracting with sweatshops are not acting wrong in any way. This was a deductive article it had a lot of good examples to show how sweatshops are beneficial to third world countries. Radly Balko seemed to have the same view point as Matt Zwolinski. Many people believe the richer countries should not support the sweatshops Balko believes if people stopped buying products made in sweatshops the companies will have to shut down and relocate, firing all of the present workers. Rasing the fact that again the worker will have no source of income, the workers need the sweatshop to survive. Balko also uses the argument that the workers willingly work in the current environments.
Look down at the clothes you're wearing right now, chances are almost every single thing you are currently wearing was made in a sweatshop. It is estimated that between 50-75% of all garments are made under sweatshop like conditions. Designers and companies get 2nd party contractors to hire people to work in these factories, this is a tool to make them not responsible for the horrendous conditions. They get away with it by saying they are providing jobs for people in 3rd world countries so its okay, but in reality they are making their lives even worse. These companies and designers only care about their bank accounts so if they can exploit poor, young people from poverty stricken countries they surely will, and they do. A sweatshop is a factory
The mere idea of sweatshops, let alone their existence, seems cruel and unusual to people like us, especially in today's day and age. After all, in sweatshops "workers are subject to extreme exploitation. This includes... (not) enabling workers to cover ...
...e their product. Sweatshops are found usually all over the world and need to make a better decision as in more labor laws, fair wages, and safety standards to better the workers' conditions. It should benefit the mutually experiences by both the employers and the employees. Most important is the need to be educated about their rights and including local labor laws.
Some people of North America know about these sweatshop workers, they feel bad and some also protest. They set up NGOs, send funds and donations but they never try to break the tradition of sweatshop working. They all assume that this is best for the society. An Idea can be drawn from William
Nicholas D. Kristof and Sheryl Wudunn are Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times journalists who spent fourteen years in Asia doing research on the country as well as the sweatshops of that country. In their article "Two Cheers for Sweatshops" they sum up clearly the misunderstanding of sweatshops by most of the modern world. "Yet sweatshops that seem brutal from the vantage point of an American sitting in his living room can appear tantalizing to a Thai laborer getting by on beetles." The fact of the matter is that sweatshops in the eyes of the actual workers are not as bad as they are made out to be, by many activists. Though many organizations that oppose sweatshops and their labor practices try to make the point that sweatshops do not have to exist. But one must consider the fact that, the companies that use sweatshops are creating at least some type of jobs for people that gladly accept them.
In order to improve conditions within sweatshops, we must think about what the worker population wants. The conditions within these factories are brutal and abusive, as well as troubling. Not only that, but the entire industry must be open to transparent evaluation to others. It is when workers have a loud and clear voice in how their working conditions are that we can see the entire system as productive and fair.” Admitting there is a problem may be the first step to recovery. Hearing workers' voices, establishing criteria for comparing factories internationally, and verifying problems and corrections through the participation of local nongovernmental organizations and unions are key steps in a long road toward improving global working conditions.”
The General Accountability Office defines a sweatshop as a “multiple labor law violator.” A sweatshop violates laws pertaining to benefits, working hours, and wages (“Toxic Uniforms”). To make more money, companies move their sweatshop factories to different locations and try to find the cheapest locations with the least regulations (“Sweatshops”). There are not as many sweatshop factories in the United States because the industries have been transferred overseas where the labor is cheaper and there are weaker regulations. In the United States, sweatshops are hidden from the public, with poor immigrant workers who are unable to speak out against the injustices (“Subsidizing Sweatshops”). Workers in sweatshops are forced to work overtime, earn below a living wage, do not earn benefits, and encounter verbal, physical and sexual abuse. Macy’s, JCPenney, Kohl’s, The
Most sweatshops have been known to be unlawful, but yet it doesn’t stop them to still be around today. Workers working in sweatshops are known to be getting paid small amount of money while working long tiring shifts, sometimes without being allowed to take a break. Many corporations have their products produce in third-world countries such as Guatemala, Pakistan, Vietnam, etc. where it costs them less to produce goods since they are paying their workers almost nothing. It is believed that it
Sweatshops are factories that violate two or more human rights. Sweatshops are known in the media and politically as dangerous places for workers to work in and are infamous for paying minimum wages for long hours of labour. The first source is a quote that states that Nike has helped improve Vietnamese’s’ workers lives by helping them be able to afford luxuries they did not have access to before such as scooters, bicycles and even cars. The source is showing sweatshops in a positive light stating how before sweatshops were established in developing countries, Vietnamese citizens were very poor and underprivileged. The source continues to say that the moment when sweatshops came to Vietnam, workers started to get more profit and their lives eventually went uphill from their due to being able to afford more necessities and luxuries; one of them being a vehicle, which makes their commute to work much faster which in turn increases their quality of life. The source demonstrates this point by mentioning that this is all due to globalization. Because of globalization, multinationals are able to make investments in developing countries which in turn offers the sweatshops and the employees better technology, better working skills and an improvement in their education which overall helps raise the sweatshops’ productivity which results in an increase
Americans do not realize the amount of clothing we wear on a daily basis is actually made in Cambodia, such as Adidas and even the Gap. The women that work for these sweatshops in Cambodia sew for 50 cents an hour, which is what allows stores in America, such as H&M to sell inexpensive clothing (Winn, 2015). The conditions these Cambodian workers face are a noisy, loud, and extremely hot environment where people are known for having huge fainting attacks. When workers were on strike a year ago, authorities actually shot multiple people just because they were trying to raise their pay. There is plenty of evidence of abuse captured through many interviews of workers from different factories, and is not just a rarity these places see often or hear of. Factories hire children, fire pregnant women because they are slow and use the bathroom to much, scream at regular workers if they use the toilet more than two times a day, scam hard working employees with not paying them their money they worked for and more, and workers are sent home and replaced if 2,000 shirts are not stitched in one day. Expectations are unrealistic and not suitable for employees to be working each day for more than ten
Sweatshops are factories or places that have people working in bad conditions for low pay. Big companies like GAP, Guess, and more own these sweatshops. They do this as a way to save money even though other people will suffer. I think there needs to be an end put to it. Mainly because the conditions and extremely low pay they get. There needs to be something done because peoples’ voices are heard but when an official or some sort of government power tells people about it or does something, then there is usually more done. So, governments need to do something about it.
Sweatshops, when left to operate without government intervention, are the most efficient way out of poverty especially in developing countries. This argument may feel far fetched, but when examined in the context of those working at sweatshops and the locations sweatshops are most often constructed in, the reason why this is true is apparent. The benefits of sweatshops can be found by examining how they increase living conditions, examining the locations where sweatshops are constructed, and looking at how government regulations on factories don’t help anyone.
“I am, somehow, less interested in the weight, and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived, and died in cotton fields, and sweatshops.”- Stephen Jay Gould. Sweatshops exploit people, and children. They take advantage of their poverty, and there need, for a better life. Sweatshops are one of the worst things that ever happened to the business world, and poor people around the world. Sweatshops should be stopped, and ended.