Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Violence and Education
Broader explanation of human aggression
Broader explanation of human aggression
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Violence and Education
Throughout history, mankind’s tendency has been to turn quicker to the sword rather than to a peaceful discussion. War follows civilizations. Some used it to their advantage, like the Romans, Aztecs or other ancient empires, to conquer new lands and people thus gaining greater power. However, the latter part of this world’s history, has been spent attempting to decrease violence. The League of Nations was created following World War I to prevent anymore wars of that destruction. Obviously the League of Nations failed leading to the start of World War II. With the end of the war in 1945, the United Nations arose to keep world peace and have thus somewhat kept to that. So, why then, has the world seemed to have fallen into greater disarray and …show more content…
Agustin Fuentes says, in his article Bad to the Bone: Are Humans Naturally Aggressive?, “Increased social inequality and more complex political and economic systems seem to correlate with more types of aggression and violence in human societies.” Ironically, those issues with using barbaric and violent ways to oppress groups of people, were fought with more violence. However, there was beginning to be this idea of rising above the primal instinct. People like Muhammad and, later, Martin Luther King Jr arose as peacefully protesters to prove violence wasn’t the only answer to conflict. Violence, while still very much ingrained in nature, had begun to evolve into something of more looked down upon, barbaric action. Although without any change in DNA or the nature of humans, suddenly violence was no longer natural. Society decided it was now the unnatural or diseased state. Robin Fox, in a speech at an international conference, said “We can predict fairly accurately when, in the escalation process, violence will occur. It is a natural, expectable, predictable, inevitable part of the process (Fox pg. 2 para. 2).” The idea that violence is unnatural needs to dissipate. Fox states simply that violence is very natural. As stated before, it was used in earlier ancestors to keep their race alive. Having the urge to punch someone or stab something is completely natural. Should those actions always be acted upon? Not necessarily. All Fox is stating is that the feeling or urge of aggression is one as natural as happiness or sadness (para. 4). Fox later stated “Whether we like violence or not is not the question here (Fox pg. 2 para. 2).” It is more about understanding the feeling. Violence is not benedictional, but it is part of human
On this planet there is only the one sure way to ensure peace, government. Luckily throughout history there have been big societies that helped countries establish governments of their own. One of the biggest and well shaped government is the democracy of the United States of America. The U.S. had two societies in particular to look to for guidance, and those two were ancient Greece and ancient Rome.
Do you believe violence is rooted into human nature?
The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton proves the point that violence can be justified if necessary. To inflict change in their lives people often fight with violence instead of peace to evoke change. The world strives for change everyday whether or not you like it. How the people create a change in society whether they use peace or war, it is up to them to decide how to modify our ever changing world. Violence and fight between the Socs and Greasers tells us that both can be justified if it inflicts positive change in society. ‘
They say time is a great teacher. How true. History has taught us that peace must be kept at all costs. The tragic story of the League of Nations centers around the man who conceived it and offered it to the world. The man who developed its charter and who died from exhaustion after his own country, the United States, refused to ratify it in the senate . On November eleventh, 1918 an armistice was declared in Europe. The President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, saw this as an opportunity to form an international organization of peace. The league was brought forth to provide security against future wars. However, the league did not fulfill the hopes of it's founders, it did not enforce the Versailles treaty, and did not protest injustices. The League took no steps to protect Ethiopia from the advancing Italians until it was too late. They did nothing to stop the German troops from rearming, even though the Versailles treaty was meant to keep Germany from rearming. Another example of the League of Nations failure is when they failed to act against the Japanese advance into Manchuria. At a time of such military aggression throughout Europe and Asia, the League had a chance to limit the activity of potentially harmful nations. With the United States not helping, the League of Nations not acting, the world was left vulnerable for another war and the eventual demise of the League of Nations.
Freud's answer finally arrives after discussing the history of everyone from the Mongols and Turks to the Romans and French. In paragraph 24, Freud says, "There is but one sure way of ending war...the establishment...of a central control which shall have the last word in every conflict of interest." This must have been a very bold statement in the early 1930's, yet less than 10 years later the United Nations was formed, and since, has almost don't what Freud visualized. Although, as we learned in March of 2002, the U.N. apparently doesn't have the last word in ever conflict of interest.
Violence in all of its manifestations is based on an exercise of power. It represents a means to gain power, to maintain power, or as a response to a threat to one's power. As long as a society maintains the legitimacy of social hierarchies, of the right of some people to have power over others, there will be violence. One can either seek to diffuse the concentration of power or to control violence. By its very character, the attempt to control violence is self-defeating. The control will itself become violent.
Since the beginning of social psychology, psychologist has been trying to analyze how people’s thoughts, feelings, and behavior are impacted by aggression. When an aggressive person gets frustrated or upset, social psychologist tracks down what exactly drives them to commit crimes, atrocities, or even abuse. According to Kassin, Fein, and Markus, aggression is “behavior intended to harm another individual” (2016). Individuals who attain this trait don’t always have to physically abuse someone, aggressive attacks could be verbal, emotional, or mental as well. Although many might argue that people who are viewed as aggressive tend to harm another person because that is their only cure, however, there are alternative motives that drive aggression,
...War II, it also did not help that the League of Nations failed and the idea of appeasement did not work out. There is not really a way to place full blame on one of these causes, as they all led to the beginning of World War II. An important part of these causes to World War II, as well as the war itself, is that the nation was able to figure out what could not work. There are times when people simply cannot be trusted, and even a treaty that seems to be important can still be gone against. Also, while it would be nice to settle disputes peacefully, that is not always an option that will work. As the textbook states, the world was at a point where they were “juggling between war and peace” (AFR 181). One of the best things that came from the war is that the nation learned these things and in turn has gone on to find new tactics to deal with conflict in the world.
Freud believes that aggression is a primal instinct, and civilization thwarts this instinct, making man unhappy. Civilized society controls man's tendency toward aggression through rules and laws and the presence of authority. These mechanisms are put in place to guarantee safety and happiness for all individuals in a society. However, the necessity of suppressing the aggressive drive in m...
Violence has for a long period of time reared its ugly head during sporting activities. Undoubtedly questions have been raised on whether football and other violent sports contribute to making human beings more civilized or they propagate the innate violent nature of human beings that has characterized their way of life. Several theories have been proposed to try to give an explanation to this peculiar human behavior. Among these theories are the biological, the psychological and the social learning theory. Biological theory asserts that aggression is an inevitable component that is part and parcel of human relations (Maguire 2008 p 54).
For example back in the history there was violence between two races of color were people got oppressed, and killed. Overall, Violence is not acceptable way to fight oppression, but In other more circumstances violence should not be the first source but it should be the last resource for people to use violence because instead of solving the conflict violence becomes worse and worse instead of solve in it. In a article Nelson Mandela stated “This required a plan which was flexible and which permitted us to act in accordance with the needs of the times; all, the plan had to be one which recognized civil war as the last resort.... We did not want to committed to civil war , but we wanted to be ready if it became inevitable”(On Violence).
Many social psychologists agree that aggression can be defined as behaviour which intends to harm another person who does not want harm inflicted on them (Baron & Richardson, 1994; Bushman & Huesmann, 2010). This definition is all encompassing capturing the possible range of aggressive behaviours whilst excluding activities that can ‘hurt’ but to which the target of the hurt willingly consents and are therefore not considered aggressive due to this circumstance, for example, surgery. As aggression can be presented at differing levels and as result of this can range from the act of pushing someone over to domestic violence or even the extremities of terrorism. Therefore, as aggressive behaviour encompasses such a wide range of actions ranging
In a world that is being changed every minute by technology, the view of who and what people are, is changing just as quickly. In all of this change where is world peace? The world is a place of constant change and a large part of this change comes from the machine of war and the advance of technology. Some of humankind’s greatest innovations have come from the need to defend the rights and freedom of different people. Armed forces are not only used in the protection of others, but are also applied in an effort to rule over or eliminate what is perceived as weaker or inferior races. For centuries there has been conflict between tribes, countries and nations. If humankind continues to travel this path he/she will no longer be the controlling entity on this planet. In a famous quote Benjamin Franklin said “Even peace may be purchased at too high a price”. What this says is that any life lost in war is a price too high to pay. Over the time that mankind has been on this planet this price been paid time and time again to no avail? Wars are still being fought in many countries all over the world today. When will it end, when will there finally be World peace? Many things will need to change in order to achieve this noble goal. The goal of world peace is a possibility and may even happen in the near future, as more countries find freedom, self-government and become part of the global community. A global community that not only serves itself but also aids in stabilizing the world community. All these things are only part of what it takes to secure global peace. What will it take to achieve a true, lasting, stable peace?
The League of Nations was an Intergovernmental Organisation which persisted from 1919 up until 1946 where it was formally replaced with the United Nations towards the end of the Second World War. Many consider the League as one of the International Systems greatest failures due to it being widely regarded as an ‘ineffective instrument to tackle aggressors’ (Catterall, 1999, p. 52) and its inherent failure to prevent international conflict. However,
Aggression and violence are the direct result of learned behavior. Our society is full of examples of violence and aggression that unfortunately have become a part of our daily lives regardless of where we live, work, or play.