Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bartleby the scrivener point of view
The mother research essay
Bartleby the scrivvener
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bartleby the scrivener point of view
Throughout history, the concept of “Bad Bosses” has been displayed in various types of literature. These various types of literature range from plays, to poems, and even short stories. Although the literature stated above may be different types, they all have potential to share the same aspect. The aspect that is similar to all the literary works we have reviewed over the course of the semester was bad bosses and how bad bosses have changed for the better or for the worst as time progressed.
One of the literary works that would best implement the aspect of bad bosses would be Bartleby the Scrivener, the short story by Herman Melville. In “Bartleby the Scrivener,” the narrator in this story symbolized the “bad boss”. His occupation is of a lawyer who maintains his wealth by helping wealthy men deal with mortgages, title deeds, and bonds. In need of another scrivener, which is a professional or public copyist or writer the lawyer hires Bartleby. Bartleby is a quiet, initially efficient, anti-social man. Bartleby, to the lawyer, doesn’t seem to have any other ambitions rather than being a scrivener for him. All of that starts to change when Bartleby begins to not want to do some of the tasks the lawyer asks him to do. The first instance of this is when he is asked to proofread one of the copies he just completed, “…rapidly stating what it was I wanted him to do – namely, to examine a small paper with me…Bartleby, in very firm voice, replied, “I would prefer not to.”(Melville 17).
The example stated above can be related to the aspect of “bad bosses” in many ways, one of which is the lawyers’ inability to fire Bartleby when he begins nonchalantly preferring not do the job he was hired for. The symbolic boss in this particular story ...
... middle of paper ...
...mates, half of all managers fall into that category. But what exactly is it that makes this scourge of the workplace so harmful? As it turns out, it's in their nature. However in the literary works discussed the bad bosses were all “bad” in their own ways. In Bartleby the Scrivener the “boss” failed to fire Bartleby after his lack of performance, which could be argued as not being a responsible boss. In the literary work “the mother”, the boss was the woman having the abortions and explaining how although she made her decision she still lives and hurts from the decision. Although she was overall her own boss, her inability to provide for her kids and choosing to have an abortion can arguably make her a “bad boss”. In the play trifles the sheriff and his inability to see Mrs. Wright for anything more than a “wife” –shows that he is not a bad boss and lack vision.
This third case study takes place within the organization called TechnoloComm. The main character in this story is named Jessica Martinez, she was hired by TechnoloComm to work in the human resources department. Specifically, she is working on internal newsletters and publicity for the organization. Peter and Alex, are two men who are a part of her team that works together on the newsletter, communication training, maintaining the company’s website and organization publicity. Their boss’ name is Tom, he is there to check in on their progress and make sure everything is running smoothly.
Management does not communicate with the workers, so they cannot discuss problems that are accruing, and possible solutions that may help the business run smoother. You can see this at Carson’s, the study mentioned that employees had no say in important decisions and were even afraid to address concerns to management. The study also mentioned that employees were not given proper constructive criticism. Instead of management teaching employee’s better ways to handle tasks, they would get upset and punish their employees. This is another aspect to an Exploitative Authoritative structure. According to text, all rewards are given to management. Instead of rewarding good things that their employees do, management punishes and threatens. After looking at the Exploitative Authoritative System that was used to run the Carson’s location, it is easy to see how and why the employees are
The lawyer, also the narrator, hires Bartleby to work as a scrivener at his business that involves bonds, mortgages and titles. The lawyer thinks he has all of his scriveners behaviors “on lock”. Although Bartleby started as a hard working employee, he eventually and in a calm manner refuses to do any requested work by the lawyer by simply saying, “I would prefer not to”. The lawyer doesn’t fire Bartleby after he declines to work, instead he gives Bartleby another chance. The lawyer preference to remain calm shows that he chooses to stray from confrontation. Bartleby continuous refusal to work leads to him being fired, but he refuses to leave. The lawyer’s philosophy and careful balancing of his employees is compromised by Bartleby actions. The lawyer moves his entire practice to another building to only find Bartleby there. Bartleby is arrested and continues in his bizarre daze. The lawyer visits Bartleby to convince him to eat and get through to him, but it doesn’t work and Bartleby dies. The lawyer sensitivity and empathy towards Bartleby raises questions to the lawyers sincerity. Ultimately, my goal is to demonstrate what was the lawyer’s intent to help Bartleby?
Supervisors such as these promote themselves through visible short-range demonstrations of accomplishments, but are unconcerned with staff development or morale (Reed, 2004, p. 67). Toxic leaders affect the atmosphere of an agency by creating a demotivational environment while attendin...
To begin, the focus will be set on the issues posed by the story of Bartleby. The audience may wonder why Bartleby goes from the employee who does his work without being problematic, to one who repetitively
In every workplace, employees do what is in their job description. Rarely there are workers who get away without performing their duties. Bartleby, however, gets away with it. In Herman Melville's "Bartleby the Scrivener", there is one character that refuses to do his work and yet he is the main concern of his boss. His boss, an attorney and the narrator of the story, isn't concerned with firing Bartleby but instead is aroused with his actions. "Bartleby, the Scrivener" can illustrate misfortune, growing compassion and a similarity to God.
The experience with my negative leader I will name Mohammad Smith the Authoritarian. I have learned as much from this poor leader as I have from strong leaders. This negative leadership style decreases the motivation of employees because it makes them feel as though they can’t respond with any initiative or creativity. This leader did not like the team to attempt questioning his directives, because he then puts on the defensive front. This leader was worried more about his status and saw his team members as subordinates or lesser people. When working projects with his team, he would tell them what he wanted done and how to accomplish and not discuss and receive advice from them. A bad supervisor is the leading cause of job dissatisfaction with jobs.
Wilson, M. S. (2011). What Makes A Good Boss?. Career Journal, The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/12/16/career-journal-what-makes-a-good-boss/
In Dubliners, characters feel trapped in work related issues, which ultimatly results in unhappiness. In the story “Counterparts”, Farrington is unhappy with his job. Working as a copy clerk, does not provide Farrington with proper satisfaction. The mistreatment he receives from his boss, makes his job worse. Mr. Alleyne screams, “you have always some excuse or another for shirking work. Let me tell you that if that contract is not copied before this evening I’ll lay the matter before Mr. Crosbie... Do you hear me now?” (83). Farringtons boss is strict and demeaning. Feelings of worthlessness are quite evident. One might argue that Farrington abuses alcohol as a way to escape his work responsibilities. He does this by engaging in constant stops at the pub during his work day. “It’s alright Mr. Shelley, said the man, pointing with his finger to indicate the objective of his journey” (84).
Fast, N., & Chen, S. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate: power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1406-1413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02452.x
Often, too much power can go to that particular person’s head, and he/she can become corrupt. As readers have seen in literature, abuses of power are often harmful to the abuser and their subjects. Corrupted authority and abuses of power eventually lead to the collapse of society. This concept is shown many times throughout the novel Lord Of the Flies and the short story “I Only Came to Use the Phone”. Displayed through characters and actions, abusive power has dominated what should be morally correct in literature.
“Dark side” leadership can cause significant harm to the organization and its members, yet individuals with these tendencies still reach positions of power since dark side characteristics are hard to detect and easy to overlook. Dark side characteristics is describe as undesirable characteristics that affect the relationship between supervisors and followers and his or her success at creating a cohesive team (Hogan, Curphy & Hogan, 1994). They can include characteristics such as narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy (Harms, Spain & Hannah, 2011), moderate and functional versions of personality disorders (Hogan & Hogan, 2001) or more exaggerated form of bright side traits (Kaiser, LeBreton, & Hogan, 2015). However, these features are
When I was working in the hospital, I had a supervisor who did not quite understand what it took to be a leader. It felt as if she was part of the team rather than the leader of the team. She would gossip with her subordinates about other employees. There had been a time when I heard her call one of her employees an idiot when he was in the next room. She would also play favorites with the workers who would gossip with her. This created a division among her workers.
Organizations have leaders who are effective and ineffective. Many of us want to be leaders but, do we have what it takes to be effective or are we going to be ineffective. Leaders are people who build their organization and employees up. Ineffective leaders are those who only care about getting a check. This paper will discuss effective and ineffective leaders. The effective and ineffective leaders I have had the pleasure to work with.
I never realized how bad a leader could be until I went to my first leadership development training back in 2005. A few years back, I worked for a dealership and there I met the terminator. One of the employees gave this name because he enjoyed terminating employees. The manager was authoritative and unbearable; he used fear tactics to try to force employees to meet deadlines and other work objectives. He would threaten to tell the senior manager about any errors we would make and would prevent us from promotions and/or receive our raise, if we did not do as he ordered. We constantly lived in fear of losing our job because of his threats. Over time, that manager eroded most of the employee’s confidence and morale, which lowered the organizations productivity and customer dissatisfaction. However, due to the decrease in workflow and increase of customer grief the general manager started an investigation in order to find the source of the problem which did not take him long to find. Once the general manager recognize the problem, he intervene in order to correct the behavior and develop an effective and positive leader out of him. He gave the manager a choice to give one-week notice or receive a warning, accept further training and be on a 30-day ...