Babar

1199 Words3 Pages

The Story of Babar by Jean De Brunhoff is a wonderful children’s book that revolves around an elephant named Babar who enters into, and becomes part of, French society. Babar runs away from the forest to what most likely is, Paris after a hunter brutally murders his mother. Once he enters Paris, a benevolent old lady takes care of him and she begins to ‘civilize’ him. She buys Babar clothes, educates him and teaches him the ways of the French. The story concludes with Babar returning to the forest, clothed, walking on two legs, and being crowned king. On deep investigation of this story, some argue that Babar is a metaphor for French colonialism and that it is “an unconscious expression of the French colonial imagination” . In response to this analysis, in his essay, Freeing the Elephants, Adam Gopnick conversely argues that Babar is not in itself a metaphor for colonialism; rather it “is a self-conscious comedy about the French colonial imagination and its close relation to the French domestic imagination” (1). This children’s book is not only about taming the savage elephant, dressing them in stylish outfits and other civilized activities, rather it is about recognizing the absurdist nature inherent in those situations. Furthermore, Gopnick argues that Babar was created as a metaphor to parallel France’s history of establishing order from chaos. By creating Babar as an inherent outsider, and using his de-familiarized perspective, De Brunhoff enabled himself to parody French societal norms and ideals of order. De Brunhoff transforms Babar from an unruly, chaotic and savage elephant to a cultured and uniformed French bourgeois gentleman. By doing so, claims Gopnick, De Brunhoff’s Babar is not only about French colonialism and re... ... middle of paper ... ...e to perceive Babar in a de-familiarized fashion. In conclusion, Gopnick analyzes the De Brunhoff’s Babar in a modern, yet historical, approach. He argues that Babar is not only about colonialism and French society benevolently rescuing and civilizing the savage; so much as it is De Brunhoff’s insider’s parody of French life itself. “Far more than an allegory of colonialism,” says Gopnick, “the ‘Babar’ books are a fable of the difficulties of a bourgeois life...The unruliness of natural life is countered by the beautiful symmetries of classical style and the absurd orderliness of domestic life—but we are kidding ourselves if we imagine that we are ever really safe.” (4). In truth, while Gopnick lacked a certain depth to his argument, he, nonetheless, achieved a fresh and compelling approach to the story and his take on Babar added a certain nuance to my own reading.

Open Document