Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book report
Athanasius: On the Incarnation - Book Report
Book Summary:
In the book, Athanasius of Alexandria explores the topic and the reasons why the incarnation of God had to occur. Athanasius starts the paper by introducing people to the tremendous power God has over the World. Athanasius writes that the only reason for God to manifest in a human body is for the salvation of all humanity. Athanasius relates salvation and creation by stating that God has employed the same agent for both.
Another important point of the book was the discussion about how the creation of all things occurred and where it originated. He wrote about some of the different points of views on that topic. The first view he talks about is the Epicurean point of view which basically
…show more content…
states that all things are haphazard; are self originated. Athanasius refutes that argument by saying that if that was the case there would be no distinctions between things in creation, “The distinctness of things argues not a spontaneous generation but a prevenient Cause; and from that Cause we can apprehend God, the Designer and Maker of all”. He also went through the points of views of Plato and the Gnostics but refutes those ideas by declaring that God is the mind behind the universe and creation, “...it did not originate itself; because God is infinite, not finite, it was not made from pre-existent matter…” He argues that God created the universe out of nothing and brought it into being through the Word. Along with that argument, he also argues the initial sin of Adam and Eve who in them, “He set them in His own paradise...if they guarded the grace and retained the loveliness of their original innocence, then the life of paradise should be theirs…” But Adam and Even decided to commit the one thing He prohibited them to do. Athanasius makes the connection between the Word’s becoming Man to Adam and Eve’s sin by saying that the reason that originated the incarnation was “...our sorry case that caused the Word to come down…” and forgive humanity’s transgressions with His love for us. God’s love for us was the single greatest reason for Him to take into a human body. In the first half chapter of the book, Athanasius makes the argument that God had to take human form because if not the nature of the word would have perished and God’s creation would have been for nothing, “It was unworthy of the goodness of God that creatures made by Him should be brought to nothing through the deceit of wrought upon man by the devil…” The writes makes the argument that God’s goodness did not allow him to just see his creation perish all caused by evil.
God’s goodness is greater than any evil that tried to neglect his creation. Developing his argument further more Athanasius discusses what other options besides the incarnation could have save God’s creation from the path of destruction. He writes in the book that human repentance was not enough to save humanity. Instead of human repentance as a way to save humanity the Son took to, “Himself a human body, a human body even as our own.” Corruption as it is described in the book could only have been abolished through death. The Father’s Son took into a human body, “...and not only so, but He took it directly from a spotless, stainless virgin, without the agency of human father - a pure body body untainted by intercourse with man.”Later on in the book, Athanasius gives the effect incarnation had on God’s creation. He writes that it put an end to death and He became the “...Lord and Savior of all…” Athanasius provides two things that the sacrifice of His human body’s sacrifice accomplished; the first one is …show more content…
that it ended the law of death and gave us the hope of resurrection. In the later chapters of the book Athanasius writes about the death of Christ.
After going through the main reason for the incarnation, this 4th century writer gives details on what Jesus Christ’s earthly life was like. Athanasius also walks through the resurrection and how the Savior “...did not allow that temple of His body to linger long, but forthwith on the third day raised it up…” In the book, Athanasius also writes about the Jews and Gentiles’ refutation and ridicule regarding all the facts behind the resurrection of Christ. Mainly he talks about the unbelief of the Jews and Gentiles even though scriptures clearly refer to Christ’s death clearly. Regarding the Gentiles, Athanasius goes on to talk about their unbelief saying that saying that the Word of God was manifested into a human body was unfitting. The book is an overall look into the incarnation and resurrection and everything in between
it. Evaluation/Analysis: The book written by Athanasius on the Incarnation very well made an argument about the incarnation and its causes. Throughout the book, Athanasius highlighted the divinity and the Trinity of God, two of the most important doctrines studied during the lectures. Athanasius, as C.S Lewis described in the introduction to the book, writes about the subject deeply but at the same time its simplicity makes it simple enough to read but most importantly understand this important topic. Throughout the chapters, I could tell that Athanasius had a very deep understanding about the topic of the incarnation and everything that conveys it. I think it was wise for Athanasius to mention the original sin to originate his most important reason for why the Son had to take human form and suffer death. The way the translation of the book originally titled “De Incarnatione” provides a lot of knowledge not only for theology students but anybody who wants a deeper understanding of Jesus Christ’s sacrifice. I felt that the book not only listed reasons for the incarnation to occur but it also gave a deep explanation on the results it had on God’s creation. I think the book provides the basic patristic understanding of the Christian religion. Thinking about it, there would be no Christianity if the incarnation and thereafter the resurrection of Jesus Christ’s had not happened. The topic explained in the book, is the foundation of any Christian doctrine. It is important to have document such as this book to understand and use our understanding to explain them to others and spread the word of God.
Chapter 2 was his observation on what is wrong with the world. His thoughts were “the state of earth is not good, and our home planet is being degraded. For example population is increase which means more pollution which is
“This He did out of sheer love for us” (Athanasius 8). This quote refers to the amount of love that God had for humanity, this love had been strong enough to shine through our own rejection towards Him. It continues to do this. When the human race repeatedly rejected God, He continued to have mercy on us. “It was our sorry case that caused the Word to come down” (Athanasius 4). Why would God continue to love us after all this? God could not abandon us, His creation. If we look at kings and rulers in the time of Jesus, we would most likely see corruption and death. When a king was upset he would often take a violent path. God, on the other hand, chose to send someone kind and loving to help us rather than to hurt us. This proves that God is and was genuinely concerned for us, and wanted to see us prosper. “ Now that the common savior of all has died on our behalf, we who believe in Christ no longer die” (Athanasius 21). God wants us to have faith in Him, He wants us to live forever with Him. Another king might bring death upon his people rather than on himself only for his well being not of his people’s. When Jesus died He gave us the option of life over death. All we must do is have faith and believe that He is the on...
The traditional Christian answer to why God allowed the death of Christ is for the absolution of humanity’s sin. However, this begs the question, as an omnipotent God why was it necess...
God is being right to himself in the denial of himself in the person of Christ for the sake of the life of the world. Many wrongly suggest that justification is solely for the pardoning of sins apart from any action on our part. This wrongly suggests that salvation is either a universal experience or one predicated on God's predestination of the elect few. As Greathouse writes, “This [Rom. 3:23-24] might mistakenly be taken to imply that human redemption is as extensive and all-inclusive as human sinfulness. This is true in potential, but God's free gift of redemption is not unconditional, nor is salvation universal.”5 As Gorman correctly points out justification, as understood through the life of Christ, is one of both sacrifice and participation. Christ dies to himself, while participating in the life of God, in full hope of the resurrection. Justification is not without participation on the part of the recipient. The cruciformity of Christ is the breaking open of the life of God for the sake of the life of all creation. The response then becomes from humans to the divinely initiated act of redemption of Christ on the cross. Participation in fiath, as Gorman indicates, is the ongoing sharing in the co-crucifixion of Christ as means of living in the hope of also sharing in the co-resurrection of Christ, living out Christlikeness in the power of
impact on how he sees human nature and how it is portrayed in the book
In this paper I will discuss three similarities and four differences between Enuma Elish-The Epic of Creation (King,1902) and Genesis 1:1-3:24 as described by Michael Fishbane (Fishbane, 1979). These writings are selected to describe the story of creation of the earth and the inhabitants of the earth. However, each author has a very different view and way of explaining what they have interpreted the sacred texts to mean.
His body, soul, mind, and spirit were of human origin. Chapter five expresses the truth that Jesus died and resurrected. Jesus was mortal and humble and, with His human nature, he suffered on the cross. Christians believe Jesus rose again on the third day. Chapter six expresses that after His resurrection, He ascended into heaven. Scripture says that Jesus sent the Holy Spirit to earth to be with those who follow Christ. Saint Augustine explained in chapter seven that Jesus, following His ascension, sits at the right hand of God the Father. This does not suggest that God is in human form and literally has a right and left hand. To sit at the right hand means to have power. Jesus had power after his ascension into heaven. One example of this power is that Jesus will be the Judge in the final days. Chapter eight expresses Christ’s coming to judgment. Jesus Christ will come and judge the quick and the dead. The quick are those who are still living when the second coming occurs, and the dead are those who passed previous to the second coming of Christ. The eternal Son of God will be the ultimate Judge of all people. The next truth in which Saint Augustine describes, in chapter nine, is the Holy Spirit and the mystery of the
Later, after much study and introspection, Augustine discovers that he has been mistaken in attributing a physical form to God. Yet, he still presses on to reconcile his mind to the true precepts of Christian ideology. But what does he...
The doctrine of incarnation is a fundamental teaching in traditional Christianity, stating that Jesus Christ and God are one, as the Son is the Father incarnated in human flesh. This affirms that Jesus is paradoxically both fully God and fully human. While there is abundant evidence in the Bible to support the belief in the doctrine, and it is the widely accepted view, still opposition has come against incarnation, branding it intrinsically contradictory. In “Homoousios with the Father” Heron discusses the necessity of incarnation through the study of the word ‘homoousios’; the word provides basic understanding of Jesus’ oneness and equality with God. This sameness is not something that can be comprehended; the attempt to convey the relationship
This is very consistence in the novel. He gets very obsessed with all these questions on the principle of life and where it comes from. “One of the phenomena which had peculiarly attracted my attention was the structure of the human frame, and, indeed, any animal endued with life. Whence, I often asked myself, did the principle of life proceed? It was a bold question, and one which has ever been considered as a mystery”.
In the book One the Incarnation by Saint Athanasius it talks about why Jesus became human for our salvation. Jesus had no reason not to enter into the world as a human, because “it was right that they should be thus attributed to his as man, in order to show that his body was a real one and not merely an appearance” (Athanasius 15). Showing that it was important for Jesus to be a human and spread his knowledge among us; to help us learn and be able to teach other through oral and written tradition. It was now necessary for Jesus to come for our salvation because “had he surrendered his body to death and then raised it at once…which showed him to be not only a man, but also a God the word” (Athanasius 14). This connects back to by why Jesus wants humans to believe that he died a human death.
The creation of man was only through the will of the gods. As a result of the war between the Titans and Zeus, Hesiod, a prominent writer of the seventh century, catalogues the origins of divine beings and mankind through a history of the events in his poem Theogony.
He talked about how to be a true scholar that has the right dutys that comes with being one. Which must also have great knowledge of nature. He says that books can be very helpful since they are keeping the age old ideas alive, which are the best for studying ideas and accomplishments of past people. I also find it interesting because he does not want scholars to follow the rules but go by their own and be a thinking man. Which is pretty different from what we are told today I think. The language he used was very strong and very educational because he was really trying to let everyone know about nature. It is also very convincing since he is trying to persuade them into becoming a “Man
Note how he lumps together "phantasm, species, or whatever". This is very sloppy, but influential nonetheless. And notice how he maintains that the object of our knowledge is the idea, and not real being (as it was for the Greek and Mediaeval thinkers).
He has a student who shared most of his beliefs, his name was Anaximander. While Anaximander shared Thales belief of material monism, he belied the material to be something different. He thought water to be too finite, and that even though there was a possibility that water could form everything, there had to be another substance instead. The substance Anaximander believed to be the one that made everything up was Apeiron which is the Greek word for boundless. He believed if everything was going to be made up of something the material had to be boundless and indefinite yet malleable. This material had to lend itself to be shaped or put in a boundary but not permanently, at one point it had to break to break down to become something else. Anaximander never really chose a specific material and left it as a "something" however, he was the first man to describe an early theory of evolution and gravity. Anaximander's early theory of evolution, was that he believed that humans came from a fish. He believed that the early humans had to have had a thorny skin as a way to hold water in. Furthermore, he believed that humans came from fish. As a way of explaining how humans survived the first ears of lives he suggested that they grew in the bellies of fish until puberty and then came out able to sustain themselves. Still, life began in the water. Anaximander, also showed early notions of gravity and though he thought that the earth was shaped like a column, he understood that something was evenly pulling the earth in place. Anaximander became a teacher as well and down his to his student Anaximenes.