Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on immigrant detention centers
Policies affecting Australian aboriginals
Policies affecting Australian aboriginals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on immigrant detention centers
Australia boasts an admirable history of involvement with the United Nations, being one of its founding members in 1945, as well as drafting, and assenting to, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. However, despite these notable humanitarian endeavours, Australia’s treatment of minority groups, namely Aboriginals and asylum seekers, has been anything but humane. Australia’s praiseworthy association with the United Nations, and its efforts in peace-keeping operations, are belied by degrading treatment of its Indigenous populace, and callous conduct towards asylum seekers.
The separation of ‘the stolen generation’ is a gross violation of Article 1 of the UDHR. The magnitude of this breach is apparent, not just in its contempt for Aboriginal
…show more content…
freedom and dignity, the very essence of the first article, but also in the vast number of Aboriginal children affected. A survey by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 1994 stated that 10% of Aboriginal people aged over 25 had been removed from their families in childhood. It is estimated that between 1883 and 1969 more than 6,200 children were stolen in NSW alone. These numbers betray the vast ramifications of the stolen generation upon the Aboriginal community. The iniquity of this act is furthered by the widespread stories of abuse and neglect occurring in the ‘homes’ where the children were held, further transgressing other articles of the UDHR. Girl’s homes such as the Cootamundra Aboriginal Girls’ Home were notorious for accounts of child sexual abuse, whilst boy’s homes, such as the Kinchela Aboriginal Boys’ Home, often offered such poor working conditions as to be akin to child slave-labour. The extent of children affected as part of the ‘stolen generation,’ and the pitiful conditions they were subjected to, show that the Australian Government’s treatment of the ‘stolen generation’ was a salient infraction of the UDHR, and vindicated Ex-Prime Minister John Howard’s words, when he said: “the greatest blemish and stain on the Australian national story is our treatment of the indigenous people.” The ‘Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER)’ is a stark contravention of article 17 of the UDHR, and allows the government to arbitrarily deprive Aboriginal people of their property and freedom. The consequences this has had are visible throughout all aspects of the aboriginal community. There has been a 14% increase in Aboriginal unemployment, largely due to an NTER precipitated decline in ‘Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP).’ Despite the NTER’s ‘chief aim’ being domestic security, chiefly for children, police reported incidents in ‘prescribed area’ have dramatically increased since the intervention - from 939 in 2010 to 1109 in 2011. Alcoholism has also increased in this time period, as has incarceration rates among the Aboriginal peoples. The NTER is clearly shown to have caused more harm than good, by exposing Aboriginal communities to Western problems, whilst obstructing Aboriginal traditions and ceremonies. Its inability to achieve its purpose shows that the NTER was primarily a ‘land grab’ with an ulterior motive of preventing domestic abuse. As respected elder Yingiya Guyula of Arnhem Land decries: “You are forcing us to abandon our culture.” Through the ‘vicious big lie [Journalist Jeff McMullen]’ of the Northern Territory Emergency Response, the Australian government is in clear infringement of article 17 of the UDHR, denying Aboriginal communities land that is rightfully theirs…and theirs alone. Perhaps the most current of Australia’s breaches of the UDHR is the transgression of article 14, flouted through the execrable treatment of asylum seekers.
According to the Australian Human Rights Commission, there are 2013 people in immigration detention facilities, and 1189 people in community detention in Australia. This includes 127 children in immigration detention facilities and 642 children in community detention. These statistics are indicative of the scale of refugees displaced by the government’s pejorative policies, and allude to the breadth of injustices inflicted upon the most vulnerable people of all. Indeed the depth of these injustices is most apparent at the infamous detention centres themselves. Indefinite detention is not just psychologically depressing, the conditions at the detention centres are violations of not just article 14, but also article 5 of the UDHR, with the ‘United Nations Special Rapportuer on Torture’ finding that harsh conditions and merciless violence in detention centres such as those on Manus island are in shocking violation of the Convention Against Torture, ratified by Australia. Such international decrial is a clear sign that Australia’s treatment of asylum seekers is in breach of the UDHR. The conditions that infants and children in these detention centres are subject to present further breaches of the UDHR, this time contravening the convention on ‘The Rights of a Child.’ The Australian government’s inhumane handling of asylum seekers is a stark violation of articles 5 and 14 of the UN, and its transgression of the convention of ‘The Rights of a Child’ educed denouncement from the UN, defaming Australia’s involvement with the United
Nations. Australia has been an influential presence at the United Nations, supplying large financial contributions and making significant military contributions to UN peace-keeping efforts. Despite this veneer of international humanitarianism however, Australia’s mistreatment of its indigenous population, and its unsympathetic attitude towards asylum seekers is indicative of a flagrant breach of many key tenets of the UDHR. Whilst Australia might have a long, deep history of involvement with the United Nations, its humanitarian abuses towards its minority groups renders this history… marred.
Australia is now facing allegations from the Human Rights Council that it has detained children and sent back refugees, in breach of international law.
Australians by not clarifying it’s stance on it’s international obligations to Indigenous Australians or reflecting it’s international rhetoric and signature on UN conventions by implementing some in domestic law. This inadequacy in the development of Indigenous Peoples Land Rights in Australia has been declared by the Working Group on Indigenous Populations in July 1997, and highlights the Australian government policy regarding Indigenous Peoples Land Rights and may be argued as a denial of justice for Indigenous People by the Australian legal system. Australia can be said to be ineffective in achieving justice for Indigenous People due to it’s failure to recognise Indigenous Australians rights to land domestically by failing the Human Rights standards contained in international initiatives to which it is a signatory.
An extraordinary 65.3 million Refugees have been displaced around the world. In 2015 Australia took 12,000 of them. But where are Australians placing these Refugees? Australia is deporting these Refugees to a third country, either on Manus or Nauru Island. These Islands have reports of inhumane and cruel treatment towards Refugees For those who aren’t fully aware of what Refugees are; they are people whom come to Australia illegally without the appropriate visas. They cannot obtain these visas because of the reasons they are fleeing their country … their Government. None the less it should be the Australian Government they fear. The concepts of refugees are kept hidden away from us by our own Government in reflection of their Governments own self-interest. This tragedy is classified as a modern day witch hunt.
Struggles by Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander people for recognition of their rights and interests have been long and arduous (Choo & Hollobach: 2003:5). The ‘watershed’ decision made by the High Court of Australia in 1992 (Mabo v Queensland) paved the way for Indigenous Australians to obtain what was ‘stolen’ from them in 1788 when the British ‘invaded’ (ATSIC:1988). The focus o...
The Stolen Generations refers to the forcible removal of Aboriginal, mostly those who were not full blooded taken between the 1830’s and the 1970’s. They were removed due to their mixed heritage, consisting of Indigenous mothers and European fathers. The Stolen Generations have had a damaging effect on the native owners of Australia, their culture, their identity and most importantly, their sense of belonging,
One of Australia’s biggest moral wrongdoings that has been continued to be overlooked is the providing of safety for refugees. Under the article 14, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it states that everyone has the right to seek and enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. It is not in anyway, shape or form illegal to seek asylum from maltreatment. Australia is obliged under international law to: offer protection, give support, ensure that any individual is not sent back unwillingly to the country of their origin. A report made by
ANTAR. (2014). Justice, Rights and Respect for Australia's First Peoples. Retrieved 05/12, 2014, Retrieved from http://antar.org.au/resources/cr-campaigner-kit?sid=3726
The United States fails to protect its borders, while Australia sacrifices human rights in order to do so. Traditionally, first-world countries and their citizens assist those in less developed countries. Many of the island nations in the south pacific suffer from poverty and frequent natural disasters. Most would agree that, as the most developed country in the region, it is Australia’s responsibility to advocate for human rights and contribute to humanitarian efforts for the island nations. To its credit, Australia normally satisfies this role. However, when asylum-seekers come by boat, Australia draws a forceful line. The United States is also tasked with protecting its borders, but takes a more appropriate approach. In 2012, the PEW research
The term government policy is any cause of action implemented by the government to change a certain situation and to tackle a wide range of issues in all areaslikefinance,education,statewelfare,immigrationlaw(https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/government-policy).For the purpose of this essay, I will be talking more about government policies in relation to refugees and asylum seekers and its implication for social work.
The rights and freedoms achieved in Australia in the 20th and 21st century can be described as discriminating, dehumanising and unfair against the Indigenous Australians. Indigenous Australians have achieved rights and freedoms in their country since the invasion of the English Monarch in 1788 through the exploration and development of laws, referendums and processes. Firstly, this essay will discuss the effects of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on the Indigenous Australians through dehumanising and discriminating against them. Secondly, this essay will discuss how Indigenous Australians gained citizenship and voting
The conditions of Australia’s immigration detention policies have also been cause for concern for probable contraventions of Articles 7 and 10 of the ICCPR. Whilst in Sweden, asylum seekers are afforded free housing whilst their applications are being processed, Australia’s methods are much more callous. Under the Pacific Solution, maritime asylum seekers are sent to impoverished tropical islands with no monitoring by human rights organisations allowed (Hyndman and Mountz, 2008). The UNHCR criticised Australia’s offshore processing centres stating that “significant overcrowding, cramped living quarters, unhygienic conditions, little privacy and harsh tropical climate contribute to the poor conditions of… Nauru and Papua New Guinea” (Morales
Since the time of federation the Aboriginal people have been fighting for their rights through protests, strikes and the notorious ‘day of mourning’. However, over the last century the Australian federal government has generated policies which manage and restrained that of the Aboriginal people’s rights, citizenships and general protection. The Australian government policy that has had the most significant impact on indigenous Australians is the assimilation policy. The reasons behind this include the influences that the stolen generation has had on the indigenous Australians, their relegated rights and their entitlement to vote and the impact that the policy has had on the indigenous people of Australia.
The Stolen Generation has had a profound impact on every aspect of the lives of Indigenous communities. It has jeopardised their very survival. It has impoverished their capacity to control and direct their future development. The Stolen Generation has corrupted, devastated and destroyed the souls, hopes and beliefs of many Australian lives through damaging assimilation policies established in an attempt to make a ‘White Australia’ possible. Discrimination, racism and prejudice are some of the many permanent scars upon Indigenous life that will never be repaired. However, recently Rudd and the Australian public have sincerely apologised for the detrimental effects the Stolen Generation had caused. The Stolen Generation has dramatically shaped Australian history and culture.
The stolen generations, the removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children that occurred in the late 19th Century to the 1970s have had effects on Indigenous people of Australia today. The 1997 report Bringing Them Home, from the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, reports that up to one in three Indigenous children were forcibly removed during this time period. The vast number of indigenous children stolen and the immense amount of sorrow that had been caused has left a lasting impact in today’s Indigenous society. The physical, emotional and sexual abuse that was faced by the overwhelming number of members of the stolen generations has left some incapable of loving and maintaining relationships, leading to
Globalisation has increased modern technology all over the world enabling more people, such as globally separated families, to maintain contact. Increased media coverage also draws the attention of the world to human rights violation which can lead to an improvement in human rights. This is not a reflection of all marginalised groups. In Australia, the detention of unaccompanied asylum seeking children (UASC) contravenes the United Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), however the media are prohibited to enter detention centres and report on this issue (Cemlyn and Briskman, 2003).