Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assimilation and multiculturalism
Multiculturalism vs assimilation essay
Assimilation and multiculturalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The theoretical framework is based, on the one hand, on theories that explain the integration model in each country, which are assimilation and multiculturalism. On the other hand, it is based on the intersectionality theory, which explains the multiple-discrimination that a person can experience. The selected three theories are essential to formulating the research hypotheses, which will subsequently be tested throughout this study.
4.1. Assimilation and multiculturalism
The socioeconomic inclusion of female refugees is shaped by the integration model that is adopted by the host country. Scholars distinguish between multiculturalism and assimilation as the main models of immigrant integration. Assimilation, on the one hand, means that the process through which a migrant absorb completely the host country’s culture and identity (Joppke, 2007). Assimilation can occur spontaneously or forcibly when a country forces a migrant to erase their original culture, language and religion in order to replace them with the host country’s culture and identity. However, Brubaker (2001) narrows down the definition of assimilation to include the integration programmes that make non-EU immigrants become more similar to the native population. Still, it can be argued that his definition is not completely accurate since learning
…show more content…
Multiculturalism is based on the recognition of the ethnic and cultural diversity of refugees and that requires tackling all direct and indirect discrimination in the labour market. Nevertheless, during the last decade, many European countries such as the Netherlands, Germany, Austria, France and the United Kingdom, have shifted their immigrant integration approach from multiculturalism to assimilation based on claims that multiculturalism has failed in integrating refugees in many EU Member States (Joppke, 2007; Koopmans 2003,
My essay focuses on discrimination as one of the main challenges that refugees face. I discuss some instances of discrimination that occurred in the book, whether based on race or culture,
Curtin’s “Coculturation: Toward a Critical Theoretical Framework for Cultural Adjustment” explores the many aspects of cultural adaptation. To enhance the conversation and construct a dialogue that counters that of the status quo, Melissa L. Curtin proposes a theory of Coculturation. Curtin (2010) seeks to “underscore the complex and ongoing processes of identification for all members of a community; to challenge any notion of a static, monolithic target culture; and to foreground that macrolevel sociopolitical and sociohistorical contexts, as well as microlevel social interactional processes, are important in understanding cultural adjustment” (p. 271). This work illuminates the conversation of acculturation and assimilation by combating the hegemonic discourse of traditional theoretical frameworks. According to Curtin, the rhetoric surrounding acculturation in the U.S. commonly “presumes an imagined national host community of a white, monolingual, English-speaking America to which immigrants should quickly assimilate.”
According to the 1951 Refugee Convention, refugee is a term applied to anyone who is outside his/her own country and cannot return due to the fear of being persecuted on the basis of race, religion, nationality, membership of a group or political opinion. Many “refugees” that the media and the general public refer to today are known as internally displaced persons, which are people forced to flee their homes to avoid things such as armed conflict, generalized violations of human rights or natural and non-natural disasters. These two groups are distinctly different but fall ...
economic, social, political or environmental reasons. The increase of human migration leads to the growth of racial, ethnic, and religious diversity in host countries. In the contemporary American society, as the number of refugees and migrants increase, government agencies and local organizations are providing social supports and "decent reception conditions" (Frelick et al, 2016, Pg. 191) in order for the newcomers to resettle quicker. Promoting the long-term integration of refugees and immigrants in the community typically starts out at the grassroots level, focusing on strengthening the voice
Many people in America want to assimilate to the U.S. because they think that being American is a better option. People such as the Italians in the 1870s tried to assimilate in order to become an American to not become an enemy in the U.S. Also, the Mexicans today are constantly coming to the U.S. to have a better life because they know being American is the best solution for their problems at home. What assimilation mean is when a person leaves one’s own culture to join a different culture the person wants to be. For the purpose of this essay, an American is a person who has commitment to succeed in what one wants, able to speak english, to love the pop culture in the U.S. at the time one is living such as the hit songs, games, T.V. shows, etc. but not to other cultures, and be a citizen in America. People throughout history must assimilate to become a true American
Immigration has been a topic that has caused multiple discussions on why people migrate from one country to another, also how it affects both the migraters and the lands they go. Immigration is the movement from one location to another to live there permanently. This topic has been usually been associated with sociology to better explain how it affects people, cultures and societies. Sociology has three forms of thinking that are used to describe and analyze this topic. There are three forms of thinking that are used to tell and describe immigration to society; structural functionalist, symbolic interactionist, and conflict theory. Each of these theories uses different forms of thinking and rationality to describe and explain socio topics.
Immigration is a complex process that results in a transformation of identity. Depending on contextual, individual, and societal differences this transformation can have either positive or detrimental results. Initially, the immigrant will be faced with an intense culture shock while settling into a new country. During this time, cognitive functioning becomes increasingly jumbled amidst the new context, resulting in immense identity confusion. This process of acculturation involves two specific issues regarding identity for each individual. These two issues include the delicate balance between remaining ethnically distinct by retaining their cultural identity and the desire to maintain positive relations with the new society. A variety of risk factors can contribute to the success or failure at effectively acculturating. Thus, those that directly experience more risk factors experience an even more delicate and complex transition often resulting in high levels of stress, confusion, social anxiety, and declined mental health.
Multiculturalism vs Assimilation America is a place where many cultures and races co-exist, so there are many different opinions and beliefs. Of course there is bound to be tension and misunderstandings, which unfortunately escalates (in some cases) into violence that we hear about in the media. So what is the solution? Should we all assimilate to one standard or should we recognize our individual cultures and consider ourselves multicultural? The answer is not an easy one to define.
The goal can then be said to understand what is known, and to push for further empirical research since Canada is inevitably multicultural. Assimilation model tries to explain the psychological state of a person living within two cultures that are perceived as dominant or more desirable. According to Gordon (1978), a number of sub-processes constitute various stages of the assimilation process: (a) cultural and behavioural assimilation, (b) structural assimilation, (c) marital assimilation, (d) identification assimilation, (e) attitudinal receptional assimilation, (f) behavioural receptional assimilation and (g) civic assimilation. Ruiz (1981) said that the goal of the assimilation process is to ultimately be accepted by the cultures a person moves through these stages. This model leads to the hypothesis that an individual will suffer a sense of alienation and isolation until he or she has been ultimately accepted by the culture (Sung, 1985).
Particularly, the use of the social conflict theory can be used to explain the fear that if immigrants didn’t assimilate, they will threaten the social fabric (Chapter 12, 334). The fight for the integration of immigrants can be merely seen as a way for the dominant class, being the ethnic Germans, to maintain the dominance of their ideas from other competing ones. A prime example generally feared is that Muslims might exert some influence in society, especially given the stereotypical framing of “Muslims as a whole as backward, intolerant, or violent” (Brown 2013). Thus, rather than recognizing or tolerating such groups as separate identities, the German integration project attempts at assimilating and eventually, weakening those separate identities. In other words, “by an intermixture with [German] people, [immigrants], or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures, and laws: in a word, soon become one people” (Chapter 12,
It would be nice to allow people to adhere to their own styles, but doing that excludes them from the already existing nation’s practices. On the other hand, requiring immigrants to completely conform to society, will result in taking away all of their beliefs. According to Malik, “‘multicultural’ has come to define both a society that is particularly diverse, usually as a result of immigration, and the policies necessary to manage such a society” (22). With the immigration that European nations have faced, there is undoubtedly diverse culture present, but the policy aspect of that multicultural definition still needs to be redefined in order to create a balance between diversity and inclusion within
The Scottish Government (2003) Refugee Integration Forum: action plan. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2003/02/16364/18141. Accessed on 10th November 2010.
The thing about multicultural education that surprised me the most was how much opposition there is to multicultural education. I would think, by now, people would be able to see how unbalanced the current educational curriculum is and welcome the inclusion of aspects from other cultures. I have read arguments ranging from, multicultural education is inherently racist to multicultural education promotes Islam and is indoctrinating our youth with terrorist ideas. Like most hot button issues in this country, people in positions of power will use everything possible, including fear-mongering, to further their agenda.
This thesis is about refugee’s social integration and the role of community based organisation in Kristiansand, Norway. More refugees who arrive in Norway are from non-western countries. They face more challenges in their everyday life in Norway. This study is about how the CBO’s address their challenges and difficulties which refugees are facing in their everyday life.
The experience has been shaped by different dimensions such as laws, types or culture. However, the most significant one should be exclusion which is defined as metaphorical symbolism of hospitality with unwelcome “others” on the spatially or perpetually outside (Lashley et al., 2007). Particularly, by offering significantly fewer social benefits (which has just been slashed by 45 %) and wages for refugees than its residents (Hansen & Malvig, 2016), Denmark has explicitly reinforced the differences between host and guest, or in other words, perpetually excluded refugees. At the same time, by accepting and protecting some of refugees across the threshold while refusing to welcome others, Denmark has implicitly excluded many refugees in terms of space. This exclusion even turns into hostility when it ran an anti-refugee ad campaign to advise people against fleeing to Denmark. This, once again, reinforces the point that hospitality in political domain has a threshold, making it impossible to applying the philosophy of absolute hospitality to include guests into the society and that when it comes closer to the threshold, it can turn into