Argumentative Essay: The Rights Of Tribal Animals

624 Words2 Pages

Intro
• Lately there has been much controversial in the news about tribes being exempt from cases, statutes, and regulations, and regulations. This has been an issue lately because they are allowing tribes to hunt and fish off their reservations that is not the problem the problem is they still do not have to abide by the statutes and regulations. I do not agree with this, if tribal members are going to hunt and fish off their land they should have to abide by the same rules as everyone else because it has already and will cause more issues with non-tribe member hunters. Also tribes are trying to convince the state to allow them to hunt animals on their reservations that are not in there their (such as spotlight deer). Tribes should have to abide by the law when they are not hunting on their reservations, and when they are hunting or fishing on their land they must abide by their signed treaties. Also as to not cause confusion when tribe member are hunting off reservations, all tribe should have to abide by the same tagging and permit policies/ guideline.
Body
…show more content…

As a result of treaties, statutes, E.O.s, and judicial decrees, certain tribal governments and State governments may have shared responsibilities to co-manage fish and wildlife resources. In such cases, and where Service jurisdiction is involved, we will consult and collaborate with tribal governments and affected State or local resource management agencies to help meet the objectives of all parties while honoring the Federal trust responsibility. In addition, we will work with tribal governments when managing ESA-listed species in accordance with S.O.s 3206 and 3225. When managing Service lands, we will consult and collaborate with affected tribal governments to solicit meaningful tribal input on resource use and management for those

Open Document