Argumentative Essay: The Future Of Gene Therapy

Imagine a world where having a child was more intense than now. Not only do you need to buy a crib, but you have to decide how smart you want your child to be or what eye color they should have. This is what the future of gene therapy will lead to if our world is not cautious. It does have its benefits that can help our world. With the new technology surrounding gene therapy, we can save children from diseases and pain. The only issue with this technology is we are changing the genetic makeup of the child. Gene therapy may also become a prevention for genetic disorders such as saving a child from having Alzheimer's disease. The extreme positive and negative effects in these procedures cause the animosity between the sides. It forces the future

It resembles a ripple effect. Once one small item is created it allows for more and more creations until it is possible out of control. “Argue that the slippery slope argument is unsound because we can avoid sliding down the slope to social and ethical disaster with adequate regulations and safeguards” (Resnik). We cannot predict the exact future. We cannot prevent one scientist from taking his power and using it for evil. Its is hard to prevent a slippery slope effect because once it is already in place. That is why people are trying to stop the process now because we can still save the creativeness of our world before it is too late. “the work sparked fears that designer babies were around the corner” (Kaiser).The future of science scares some people because we cannot control the technology nor the scientists. The slippery slope is scary because at this point it seem plausible in our society for this one technique to lead to designer babies. It could lead to the developing children and their genes instead of letting science and an above power do its job. The slope leads us down a scary path that destroys our society and its wonders bit by bit.

Gene therapy is a treacherous direction into altercations in the human race. The argument is that technology has the potential to help but also opens a dangerous door to new biological science. The future of gene therapy splits into a two-sided argument. The truth

It explains that with clinical trials, screening and the proper knowledge gene therapy will be beneficial to our race. It can hopefully put an end to deadly or detrimental genetic disorders. “I think it is possible to practice genetic enhancement without violating commonly accepted principles of ethics or social justice” (Resnik 28). Resnik claims gene therapy can be dangerous but with the right rules in place we can make sure the evilness does not come out of this new science. He also talks about why it should be legal and plausible in our society. It states that with our society’s parental rights and customs gene therapy may be able to exist. “Parents have the right to bear children, to raise children and make decisions concerning their health … Then parents have the right to pursue forms of HGLGT (Human Germ-Line Gene Therapy) that promotes health” (Resnik 25). This is claiming that parents have a right to this new technology in order to better the lives of their children. We do acknowledge that parents do have ultimate control over their children in society but gene therapy may be crossing a line. The article is summed up by say the underlying problem regarding gene therapy is the lack of education. When we educate everyone on the fact of gene therapy and the rights of humankind the the development of gene therapy