There's a problem in America. Children, defenseless are being shot one by one. They go to their school and the schools are a gun free zone. The shooters take advantage of it and take the children's lives. Teachers should be able to carry a handgun to protect their children. This is very important, to all teachers and students for their safety. Shooters wouldn't come in the school knowing that the teacher had a gun. Students would feel way safer. There would be a lot of safety that would go into this.there are a lot of facts that can help us make the decision.
Here are all of the numbers and facts about school And that if teachers carry handguns to protect students. “For the past ten years, it has been legal for teachers to have guns at school, and in that time, there hasn't been a K-12 shooting”(yes or no) In Utah for 10 years teachers have been allowed to carry guns and no K-12 school shootings have happened(yes or no) Taking the time to hit the shooter with a chair will get you and your students killed.
…show more content…
They are our first defense and would be able to react much faster than any police officer who couldn't get to the scene in time “(yes or no)”The teachers will be certified which requires a background check so all teachers carrying will be mentally stable. most of the public shootings are in gun-free areas, i.e. schools, malls, etc. By making schools gun-free it doesn't make the school safer for the children, it makes it safer for the shooter. “(yes or no) “Teachers are the first line of defense in a classroom. And it states in the 2nd Amendment that we have the right to bear arms. In Utah, the 10 years teachers have been allowed to carry guns no K-12 school shooting have occurred. Some teachers spend more time with students than their own parents do “(yes or no). I can not find a way that this is still not safe. The safety is
Arming teachers is deranged. Many teachers or potential teachers may shy away from their dreams or future plans of being a teacher with forcing him/her to carry guns and police student’s.
One of the biggest debates in education is how to respond to gun violence in schools. According to BBC, “There were 64 school shootings in 2015” (BBC). One response to the rise in gun violence in schools is to arm teachers. Even our President has mentioned “giving a bonus” (Davis 2) to teachers that The fact that the idea of arming teachers is even being discussed is disappointing. Bringing more guns into a school is not the answer to gun violence. Most people that defend the idea that guns will “help” keep schools safe have basically three points: (1) teachers will be trained in gun safety, (2) it helps deter potential school shooters, and (3) it will make the students feel more safe. Even though there is some truth to those points, I think that the cons of arming teachers vastly outweigh the pros of arming teachers.
That is why Rebekah Elliott’s article “The Real School Safety Debate: Why Legislative Responses Should Focus on Schools and Not on Guns” would be valuable to include. Elliot writes that to properly provide safety into schools is to put more funding into higher security and individual school safety programs. Like many writers, she agrees that the Sandy Hook incident shifted America’s views on the second amendment but she believes that having armed teachers could be a safety risk in itself. Her argument is that although it would be more cost efficient to arm teachers than to hire more security, it could increase the liability for negligence if there was a result in injuring a student (2015
Everyone knows that parents’ first worry is the safety of their children. With the increase of violence in schools, parents have started to wonder if their children are really safe in the school setting. Shootings like Sandy Hook and Columbine left parents, administrators, and educators feeling the need to be proactive towards children’s safety. Reacting to situations like these is not good enough when children’s lives are on the line. Administration has started to brainstorm different ways to help insure the protection of their students. The idea of having teachers carry concealed weapons has been on the front burner for quite some time. As a result of this extreme idea, insurance companies have started to increase or even cancel policies with schools that have armed teachers because of the high risk they are putting themselves at. Parents and administrators also worry about the idea of children getting their hands on one of the teachers’ weapons and injuring themselves or other students. Because this idea seems quite extreme, I believe there are other alternatives that are less dramatic and more positively out looked, such as having armed security guards in schools.
Another reason teachers should not be able to carry guns is because it would be very hazardous; Kids would feel unsafe with guns easily accessible. Having a gun in the classroom would create tension and make it to focus. If teachers accepted firearms then a child could get their hands on it. According to Corbett from Slate magazine, “If a gun finds its way into a teacher’s desk, briefcase, or purse. A child will get his hand on it.” If the gun was easil...
... a high school student, I don’t take much stock in the safety codes and drills in place to keep students safe in the event of a shooting. I would feel much safer knowing my teacher has the ability to protect the class, rather than hide and lock the door. An educator is responsible for the students in their class. They are responsible for their education and their safety while the children are in their classroom. The safety of fifteen or more students would be much more easily secured by one person if that person was armed. Promoting teachers to arm themselves also prevents school shootings; criminals don’t attack a victim that can fight back. At least 60% of school attacks would be prevented with an armed faculty warning sign. School faculty members should be armed to secure the safety of the countries students, and in hand prevent the majority of potential shootings.
Allowing concealed weapons in the schools is not a good thing because the teachers are not trained enough to carry a concealed weapon at the schools. Teachers need a lot of training just to hold the weapon and how they should be using it. Teachers also need a lot of nerves to use the gun on somebody else and it’s not about just using it, it’s also about doing the right thing at the right time. A couple of years ago Utah was the first state to legalize to carry a concealed weapon at the schools. According to Desert News, Last year a town named Taylorsville in Utah, a sixth-grade teacher injured herself in the school bathroom when her concealed firearm accidentally went off inside an elementary school bathroom. Luckily she just did not had serious injuries. If we allowed teachers to carry
Allowing teachers to carry guns could help lower school shootings. “While some believe tighter gun controls are the answer, others believe the best solution comes in giving more people — like teachers and administrators — more training and more access to firearms that can save lives as well as take them away” (Evensen guns and teachers). “Our organization
In the past years, there have been many school shootings that have happened. People are starting to think that arming teachers will stop school shootings. Others are opposed to arming teachers for many reasons. Armed teachers could stop or create more violence in schools. Due to all the recent school shootings, many people believe school teachers should be allowed to carry weapons, others believe it would lead to more shooting incidents.
The idea of teachers having a firearm on them came with many cons. According to the article “The Nation Arming Teachers to Keep Schools Safe,” School Board President Mark McPherson said, “I don't feel we can train a teacher to respond effectively in that situation by giving them a 40-hour course, that isn't enough for them to execute with clarity and in an expert manner in a situation that normally calls for a professional.” Many believe that this is true. Teachers don't just have to be physically ready, but also have to be mentally ready for when the time comes. For many states, teachers carrying a gun is not an option and will not be one for many years.
Their argument has some truth to it but the dangerous situations could be easily avoided with concealed carry or even a safe/lockbox. Teachers should be able to carry handguns in school because they would be able to protect from intruders, to deter invaders, and to be able to exercise their rights given to them by the 2nd Amendment.
Another reason that teachers should not be armed is that there are already police officers there. There are two reasons why police officers should be the ones with weapons. Reason A is that police officers are trained to be alert and react within seconds of an attack. According to retired United States Marine, Bill Holtzclaw,"We must recognize the difference between a teacher carrying a concealed weapon and the training required to engage an active shooter" (¨US Today¨). A teacher cannot be expected to react to a volatile situation within seconds. Reason B is that a teacher's job is to teach, and a police officer's job is to protect. Why give teachers an extra thing to worry about when
Bang! A gunshot rings in your ear as a student next to you gets shot. With nothing to defend yourself with you run away hoping not to get hit. This scenario can change if teachers carry guns, they could of defended it. A lot of school shootings have been happening over the past few years.
GUN CONTROL & FIREARM-RELATED DEATHS Gun control debates frequently saturate American media news outlets at least once a year, especially following firearm-related massacres that capture national attention. The latest event that precipitated such heated discussion was the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting of 2012, where the lives of young precious first graders were unfairly taken. This tragedy reignited the endless evaluation of the value of the 2nd amendment in contemporary society. Seeing as the most common governmental mission is to "serve and protect," there is both a moral and political obligation to enact gun control legislation because it reduces loss of life and is essential to the common protection of a nation’s citizenry.
Out of the 102 teachers that responded, 62% of those teachers said that they were for teaching gun safety in schools. Of those 62%, about 54% say that they feel that police or trained military personnel should teach these safety classes in the schools.