Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of animal testing
Consequences of animal testing
Consequences of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of animal testing
Now that we have a good feeling to what animal testing is and where it is being done, I will explain why animal testing is wrong and the negatives that come from it. Humans are animals, so it may seem like non-human animals are perfect for finding out answers that we may not know about medications, chemicals, and products. But what people do not understand is that these animals are suffering. Animals and humans are morally equal therefore animals should be awarded the same respect as humans (Liou, July 6, 2010). As animal rights activist, Ingrid E. Newkirk quotes, “When it comes to having a central nervous system, and the ability to feel pain, hunger, and thirst, a rat is a pig, a pig is a dog, and a dog is a boy.” We all feel, think and behave in the same way but we still continue to harm and test animals for our own benefit without giving them a say. This is well said by Indian philosopher and poet, Sri Aurobindo, when he says “Life is life- whether in a cat, dog, or man. There is no difference between a cat or man. The idea of difference is a humans conception for man’s own advantage.”
Although researchers can reduce the pain for animals, they cannot completely prevent the pain and do not know for sure if the animal is comfortable. With some types of tests, anaesthetics are possible, but in others a pain reliever can
…show more content…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is in charge of enforcing the AWA and this department is also in the process of developing a law that will help govern and control human handling, care, and treatment for those animals that are bred for research. The only problem with this department is that when it finds the institutions that are not following the rules of the AWA, the penalties are too small to make a change (New-England Anti-Vivisection Society,
Animals are used as a part of experimentations in order to accomplish new openings. A few individuals think that it is satisfactory, while others contend that it is not moral to sacrifice animals for science. Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Despite the significance of experiments, the quantity of animals and purpose of research are not under any control. Animals testing should be banned under a few circumstances; we can enhance the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society for Applied Ethology.
There are many pros and cons to the practice of animal testing. Unfortunately, neither side pleases everyone- including the general public, government and scientists. Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for many different reasons; finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medication. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer, HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. Scientists usually use animals for testing purpose because they are considering similar to humans. Animals have their differences, and are also similarities. This is what comparative medicine is about: researches use both similarities and differences to gain insight into the many complex human biological systems.
that outlaws any experiment, no matter how much pain the animals are put through. The AWA still allows the animals to be starved, electrically shocked, driven insane, or burned with a blowtorch. The animals are used as subjects in research for AIDS, cleaning supplies, diabetes, cancer, cosmetics, bio-chemical weapons, vaccines, and more. Even when that wasn’t enough they are also research subjects for psychological problems such as, anxiety, isolation, pain, and hallucinations. Some of these studies require surgically manipulating the brain to get results. The laboratories are not required under AWA to give the animal’s medication or anesthesia, unless “the experiment allows”, and it is under the research to make the decision the pain medication is
Every year millions of animals are abused, injured, and hurt. It seems as if humans are not very concerned about animal rights according to these statistics.. Animal rights is the idea that animals should not have to suffer and be able to be in possession of their life. Some people are willing to sacrifice things such as certain brands of makeup or certain kinds of food to improve animal welfare. For many years animals have been experimented on and placed in factory farms. Factory farming is a method of producing food products where the factories value how much they produce and how much they profit over the welfare of the animals. These farms keep animals confined in small spaces and make the animals eat things they were not originally
“The question is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk. But can they suffer?” (Bentham). Each year over a hundred million animals endure a number of experiments in an attempt to make human lives easier. These experiments range from cosmetic testing to medical research, sadly neither of these tests are needed. Many people will accept animal research because they believe that these animals aren’t suffering (“Harm and Suffering”) or they believe that animal testing in beneficial to humans. In reality, these animals suffer for mankind, when the need does not exist. Animal testing creates unnecessary pain and suffering for animals, when in reality most experiments will not benefit human health.
... middle of paper ... ... There are alternatives without testing or torturing the animals. These non-animal methods usually take less time to complete, cost a fraction of what the animal experiments would be, and they are not plagued with species differences that make extrapolation difficult or impossible.
There is a moral blind spot in the treatment of animals that enable us to justify the cruelties for the perceived benefits of humans. Animals are living things. They have lungs which breathe, hearts which beat, and blood that flows. In fact, animals sense of smell, sight, and sound is much more acute than our own. Therefore, we can assume that their sensitivity to pain is at least equal to ours. According to Hippocrates, “The soul is the same in all living creatures, although the body of each is different.” This can go with the Duty Theory that states that every individual gets treated the same. The intentions of animal testing is not to harm the animals, but that is exactly what it does.
There are many things going on in today’s society, of which include animal testing. This is happening in many famous medical/cosmetics laboratories, including L'oreal and Suave. There are many different experiments done to these animals, including ones that change the mind and appearance of the animals themselves. Seeing as these animals are abused in well-known companies so often, it’s society’s job to help and try to stop it. These tests are performed on these helpless animals, who have no way of speaking up or telling us to stop. Because of this, a lot of the scientists who perform these tests believe that the animals have no rights at all. Animals do have rights, but because of the testing people think they have none at all. There are also instances where one animal is tested on repeatedly, giving its health some of the worst side effects. In the aftermath of these tests, the animals are struck with illness and (as a worst case scenario,) death. There are many different routes/forms for sickness to take in these cases as well, meaning there is a variety of bad side effects for each illness to take. These different illnesses and side effects of the illnesses will be bad for the animals’ health, seeing as they are, indeed, bad. These will be covered in the next paragraph.
Animals have held an important spot in many of our lives. Some people look at animals as companions and others see them as a means of experimental research and medical advancement. With the interest to gain knowledge, physicians have dissected animals. The ethics of animal testing have always been questioned because humans do not want to think of animals on the same level as humans. Incapable of our thinking and unable to speak, animals do not deserve to be tested on by products and be conducted in experiments for our scientific improvement. Experimentation on animals is cruel, unfair, and does not have enough beneficial results to consider it essential.
Hundreds of millions of animals die every year from animal testing in the United States. Innocent animals are used everyday in laboratories for biology advancements, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. They are used to provide information to make better products that are safe for human use. Although animal experimentation has some benefits, the negatives outweigh the positives. Animal testing is killing off innocent beings for the possible human benefit, and with modern technology, there are alternative ways to test products that leave animals unharmed.
The AWA (Animal Welfare Act) doesn't protect rats or mice, they are the most commonly used animals. If the animals aren't protected this can lead to the mistreatment of them. The Animal Welfare act also doesn't prevent cases of terrible abuse during in the labs. In 2009 there were 338 violations of the Animal Welfare Acts at just one research center in
Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. According to Humane Society International “animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies , neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means” (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). The Draize eye test, used by companies to test irritation caused by shampoos and other products, involves animals being held in stocks with their eyelids held open by clips, so they cannot blink the products away. In the past “ animals have suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief, including 1,395 primates, 5,996 rabbits, 33,652 guinea pigs, and 48,015 hamsters” (Harm and
The researchers will take the animal of chosen then restrain them with hands, legs, and neck restraints. The scientists then proceeds to repeatedly inject that animal until an irritation or reaction occurs. “Many animal experiments utilize restraining devices, designed to prevent an animal from moving. Some research projects call for immobilization of specific parts of an animal’s body—head and neck, legs and pelvis—while other protocols involve immobilization of an animal’s entire body” (“Harm and Suffering”). Also, before testing, animals are not given any type of pain relief. “Over 70% of experiments were carried out without providing the animals with a local or general anaesthetic” (“Cruelty Free
Using animal testing we are able to figure out if a product or vaccine is safe for people to use. If it was not for the animals the only way we would be able to tell if it was safe would be to test it on ourselves. Not many people would want to try out a new drug that could cure a disease because of the side effects or even possible death from it and that is where animal testing comes in. Scientists do not make animals just take the pain if they think it will be painful for them. They will give the animal painkillers to relieve the pain if it is evolved. Scientists will also test it on another alternative if possible before testing it on the
For many years now, animals have been used for testing and experimentation. Many organizations like PETA and the ARF (Animal Rescue Foundation) strongly oppose the topic of animals being experimented on. Many people are against animal testing as a whole because not only does it harm animals, but many times they may be killed. There have been many countless years and protests against testing, and they deserved to be heard and listened to. People have begun to realize that not only does animal testing harm and kill animals every year; it has been pretty much useless.