1.2 Current Situation
With the increasing number of researches increasing to take place for different purposes including industrial and health purposes, animal testing is also increasing
in number. Many non governmental organisation are against animal testing and this has caused a very large impact on the opinion the society used to have
towards animal testing. This has caused different people to have different personal views on animal testing. Recent studies show that about 20 million animals
are being killed as they are used in animal testing (Andre & Velasquez, n.d.). While there are some who are against animal testing, some companies especially
companies producing drugs for medical supply continue to use animals to test their products. Issue of counting animals that are being tested is also another
complication. About 90 percent of the animals that are being tested are not even counted in the U.S. statistics alone without taking other countries into account
(11 Facts about Animal Testing, n.d.).
1.3 Reserch Question
Taking into consideration all the opinions of supporters and those who oppose to animal testing, different point of views have raised in number to stand with
their interests. By investigating all the viewpoints of the general public, scientists and non governmental organisation, the main question that should be brought
forward and answered is: "Does animal testing cause negative effects to the society?"
1.4 Thesis Statement
Upon closes analysis, it can be concluded that there are negative effects of animal testing on the society. Negative effects of animal testing on the environment
includes the incompability of the human body with animals, high costs are involved in carrying out animals testing and the matter of safety also needs to be
considered too.
1.5 Scope of Research
Therefore, this report will focus on what are the negative impacts of animal testing on the society, bas on the thesis statement above. This research will
investigate in further what are the negative impacts of animal testing on the society with examples as well as taking into consideration all the arguments which
support animal testing to have a better understanding of this issue entirely.
2.0 Body of content
2.1 Incompability of the human body to animals
First and foremost, one of the conflicts made against animal testing is regarding the incompability of the human body to animals. This can vary in
many different ways. Animals and humans have a totally different system although humans and most animals come under the clssification on being mammals.
This is important because understanding the way in which this happens, attitudes towards animal testing, are formed and how they spread will likely have an impact on public policy on animal welfare and animal rights activism. The information presented and the results will justify my view on animal testing and why it should be banned from scientific reasonings. (75 words)
“Arguments against animal testing” by Natasha Bantwal was written for the general audience World Health Organization is interested within the articles concerning animal testing. This article is narrow as a result of Brantwal uses several facts to validate her opinion. In this article, Bantwal has with success, coordinated Aristotle’s tools of logos, ethos and pathos. For example, Bantwal embodies an ethos, otherwise referred to as the argument by character in her writing. Reading through this article, Bantwal energetic comprehension and knowledge of animal testing is clear. To provide herself much additional credit, she quotes a specialist who additionally accepts animal testing is truly not beneficial.
Throughout my paper, I felt as though I was able to give a solid and fair representation of the opposing viewpoint on issue of animal testing. However, it was challenging because I strongly oppose animal testing.
...aid to help society, however, others feel that it hurts society. This controversial topic causes people to have such a wide variety of views on the subject. To make it a bit fairer for everyone, laws and regulations have been passed that favor to all of the sides. These laws consist of ways to limit the number of animals being tested and how they can be tested. Yet these laws still give scientist a lot of leeway on how they test on the animals and what they test on them (Beauchamp 113). Although the opposing sides may agree on most of the regulations that are set, they also disagree on many other subjects. These subjects include whether the tests lead to medical breakthroughs or not and whether or not they are ethical. Lastly, there may be laws to help reduce animal testing, but as long as it is still being done, there will continue to be controversy on the subject.
Animal testing has been used for developing and researching cures for medical conditions. For example, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for cancer, insulin treatment for diabetes, organ transplants and blood transfusions are just some of the important advances that have come from research on animals (“Animal Testing”). Consuming animals for research benefits in developing various treatments and also benefits in discovery better methods for cures. According to the article “Animal Testing”, it says that the underlying rationale for the use of animal testing is that living organisms provide interactive, dynamic systems that scientists can observe and manipulate in order to understand normal and pathological functioning as well as the effectiveness of medical interventions. It relies on the physiological and anatomical similarities between humans and other animals (MacClellan, Joel). Meaning that animals have the same body components and features as humans and is the best thing to research on to better understand the human development. Even though several argue that animal testing is harming the animals, one has to think back to all the benefits that has come from it. There may be a little remorse for endangering animal lives, but realizing how far medicine has come makes it worth the while.
One word comes to mind when I think of animal testing: cruel. Animal testing has been a subject of debate for many years. While most people think that using animals to test products is a reasonable approach, in reality the outcome does not always show how the products will react on humans, and the animals suffer unnecessarily. The United States needs to ban all animal testing like the European Union did because testing on animals is cruel and animals should not be dying from it.
Current animal testing has been a contentious subject ever since it started off 150 years back. Although a lot of people discover animal testing inhumane and egoistic, it is an important factor to boost our understanding of medication and to improve our understanding of science. Animal testing, to some, is the way to ameliorate our level of living and preserve many lives, and therefore has many benefits. On the other hand, the negatives may not be passed, and scientists are constantly trying to decrease the damage with some methods they create in the process. Even so, to the dismay of numerous animal lovers in addition to those who are endeavoring for animal rights, animal testing will not be stopped every time soon because, for now, it is the most trustworthy form of testing that includes the safety of daily products we use more carefully than any other procedure.
Animal testing is a controversial topic, with two main sides of the argument. The side opposing animal testing states it is unethical and inhumane that animals have a right to choose where and how they live instead of being subjected to experiments. The view is that all living organisms have a right of freedom; it is a right, not a privilege. The side for animal testing thinks that it should continue, without animal testing there would be fewer medical and scientific breakthroughs. This side states that the outcome is worth the investment of testing on animals.
Hundreds and millions of animals are killed everyday due to animal testing. The number of animal deaths in labs have halved since the 1970’s. An animal dies in a Canadian lab every 16 seconds! The contemporary scale of animal deaths due to animal testing is unacceptable! 17-22 million animals are tested on each year and at least half are put to death. 2.5 million animals are killed due to animal testing at the Great Britain Zoo every year. Animal testing essentially involves harming or killing the animals, every year so many innocent animals are put to death on behalf of our a...
The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion.
All over the world, people continue to conduct tests on animals. Due to the minimum standards given, there is very little regulation
Now，animal testing is still a controversial subject, and the scientists are facing an increasing problem, which more and more people appeal to stop animal testing. The original purpose of animal testing was inventing drugs for human diseases. For example, Scutti (2013) states that 98 of Nobel Prizes awarded for Physiology or Medicine, 75 were directly dependent on research from animals. The four non-animal experiment prize winners were also relied on the data, which obtained from other animal research groups. However, as people think about animal rights, and the news that animals are suffering in the experiment, people began to consider to stop all animal testing. The animal testing should be not be banned,
Our case is that if we don’t test on animals then progress in scientific fields would be halted. As first speaker for the negative I will speak about the benefits of animal testing in general and then I’ll talk in detail about animal testing in medicine. My second speaker will talk about the opinions on testing and the food chain and my third speaker will summarise our points and rebut.
The issue of animal testing has been a hot topic for many years. People who believe it is necessary to use animals in scientific and commercial research most likely argue that the practice has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments and that testing on them is similar to a human therefore results are more accurate. Those who oppose animal testing believe that alternatives are far more efficient and that animal experimentation is not reliable to its results. These people fight animal testing because animals deserve to live their lives free from suffering and exploitation. Companies all over the United States have claimed that moving away from animal testing has made their industry grow in profit.
Animal testing hasn’t been beneficiary towards any scientific breakthrough or discovery. Elias Zourhini says, “Animal testing has been useless” he is one of the main people who are strongly making a push to try and stop animal testing as a whole. “There have been thousands of dead and injured animals in the past years or so and there has been any reward or safety ensured because of these animals. Animals have been being used for testing for many years now, and especially now, the number of animals that are being used to be experimented on are extremely high. However, you may not know that laboratories aren’t required to publish how many animals they used or how many experiments conducted. Maybe that would help to find out especially what animals need to be strongly protected against testing. “Every laboratory should publish an annual statement setting forth plainly the number and kind of experiments and the methods of conducting them” (Gould qd. in Leffingwell 211). This would help many things and especially organizations that are protesting, to give reasons and facts about testing. Animals are used and then unaccounted for. Truly, you may never know h...