Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The possibility of evil character traits
Morality in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The possibility of evil character traits
The question of what determines our moral code has been debated for centuries. Are some individuals born evil, or is it a learned trait? In Grendel, John Gardner gives the one-dimensional antagonist from ¨Beowulf¨ his own story. Grendel is a “demon” who lives in an isolated cave for much of his early life. When he ventures into the outside world, he becomes so mad at the Danish king, Hrothgar, that he starts a “war” where he attacks Hrothgar’s mead hall every night for twelve years. Hrothgar’s people view it as savagery, but Grendel seems himself as a punisher of humanity's sinful ways. Grendel merely decided what was right and wrong based on what the humans were doing; the punishment was just in his eyes. He realizes that humans are wasteful, …show more content…
In Grendel, John Gardner shows that Grendel’s sense of right and wrong is shaped by the sins of man. Grendel watches the humans commit unnecessary acts of violence, and he uses them to justify his war with Hrothgar. He watches human tribes fight with one another, and is appalled by how they waste livestock, burn villages, and slaughter people. He finds himself “sickened, if only by the waste of it.” (Gardner, 36) Grendel doesn’t understand why the humans kill unnecessarily, but he is viewed as a monster when he kills for his own survival. Hrothgar becomes the most powerful king in the land, and Grendel has watched him waste and sin more than anyone else. Grendel sees himself as better than Hrothgar, which justifies attacking him for punishment. A similarly influential event occurs when Grendel steps on a dead man one night while listening to the Shaper sing. The Shaper says a …show more content…
The Shaper is a blind man who comes to Hrothgar’s hall one day, promising to sing for their entertainment. He weaves an embellished tale of how Hrothgar’s ancestor, Scyld, had “rebuilt the old Danish Kingdom from ashes.” (Gardner, 42) Grendel witnessed the disorganized fighting that led to Hrothgar’s tribe consolidating his power, but the artful skills of the Shaper’s song almost lead him to believe that the lies are true. This confuses Grendel, because the Shaper must know the truth (one can’t lie about the past if they don’t know how it happened), so why does he say things that are blatantly untrue? More importantly, why does Grendel lose himself in the words of the Shaper? Grendel finds himself hanging onto every word the Shaper says, just because the songs he sings are beautiful in and of themselves. When Hrothgar builds a magnificent mead hall and celebrates with all his subjects, Grendel actually starts to believe that Hrothgar is a benevolent, wise king. He knows this isn’t true, but the Shaper continues to sing about Hrothgar’s greatness, and Grendel mentally goes along with it. All of this backfires, however, when the Shaper sings about Grendel being cursed by Cain. When Grendel is chased out of the hall after he finds the dead man, he realizes that the Shaper has his own version of what is right and what is wrong, just like everybody else. He says “if the Shaper’s vision of goodness and peace was a part of
Rudd cites various sections of the poem, describing Grendel as a “night-monster of the border lands” (Rudd 3), and the translation of the poem says that Grendel was, “...Conceived by a pair of those monsters born Of Cain, murderous creatures banished By God…” (Raffel 42). Rudd also gives evidence for Grendel being seen as demonic, and reasons that Grendel attacks the Danes out of “...not mere thirst for gore, as we might suspect… but rather… envy of the Danes’ happiness- and envy was a chief characteristic of the medieval devil.” (Ruud 5). He then ties this devilish persona to Grendel’s humanistic aspects, stating Grendel has a heathen soul, and therefore he must be human. Ruud also notes, however, that there are critics who question the validity of portraying Grendel as this three-sided figure, asking questions such as, “How can Grendel be a devil when he has a physical body? How can he be a man when he is so manifestly bestial?” (Ruud 7). Ruud believes that the original poet of Beowulf is doing this for effect rather than consistency, but a more reasonable explanation that encompasses all three characteristics is that Grendel represents the evil in
Like animals they are frightened of anything that is different from what they are used to. When Grendel attempts to communicate they show their ignorance and simple-mindedness. Instead of taking the time to understand. the anomaly in their world, they panic and decide to destroy it. Without being able to view the story from Grendel's point of view the reader might assume that the humans had every right to attack. Another example of the same type of simple-mindedness is their second premature attack on Grendel. After hearing the shaper's words, Grendel weeps, "'Mercy! Peace! ' " ( ch.4 pp.50) in the hopes of salvation from the god of these men. The men, in a drunken state, merely misunderstand Grendel's intentions and attack him. once again. Instead of killing the men, which would have been an easy task. for the giant, Grendel escapes into the night. This action alone defines.
He is giddy with joy for the battle that will soon commence. Before the bloodshed finally erupts the Scylding king (talks) offers his sister Wealtheow to Hrothgar as a peace gift for the powerful king. Hrothgar accepts the beautiful Wealtheow and Grendel still waiting in the thick forest is suddenly flooded with emotions. Even to the point of saying, “She tore me apart as once the Shaper’s song had done. As for my benefit, as if in vicious scorn of me, children came from the meadhall and ran down to her weeping, to snatch at her hands and dress. “Stop it!” I whispered. “Stupid!”.” Wealtheow emits propaganda not by her words but her actions. Her courage and beauty cause Grendel to see the good in humans which in a way torments him. He sees the children running to her weeping and feels as if he is a child again wanting to be comforted by her. This play on Grendel’s adolescence and lack of a strong mother figure drives her message of propaganda deeper into his subconscious. (Her courageous deeds influence Grendel to the nihilistic view of the
What's the difference between good and evil? In John Gardner’s classic tale Grendel the line between good and evil is exceedingly blurred. Gardner does a phenomenal job of forcing the reader to question who the real hero of the story is. So is Grendel evil or simply misunderstood? To answer this question one must look at his basic character traits. Grendel is an unloving creature, he enjoys killing and torturing humans, and when he shows any sort of mercy, he later regrets it. Due to these facts it is impossible to label him as “good”.
In John Gardner’s Grendel, the Shaper is an important contributing character that carries the plot in a historical sense. During the first encounter between the monster and the humans, Grendel hears of the stories and tales the Shaper is singing about in Hrothgar’s mead-hall. Throughout the story the Shaper tells about Danish history and the creation of man’s existence and Grendel is fascinated by this. After listening to the Shaper’s stories, Grendel starts to realize that what he is saying is not true, “I too crept away, my mind aswim in ringing phrases, magnificent, golden, and all of them, incredibly, lies,” and starts to question what is true and what is not (Gardner 43). The Shaper’s eloquent tales had a large effect on Grendel, “He told of an ancient feud between two brothers which split all the world between darkness and light. And I, Grendel, was the dark side...I believed him! Such was the power of the Shaper's harp!” (Gardner 52). Gardner’s writing of Grendel sheds light on a whole new side of Grendel, as opposed to the monstrous being in Beowulf; so much so that we can see a divide in G...
Throughout John Gardner’s Grendel, the audience bears witness to a creature who has been ostracized by the world around him. Throughout his journey, the stories protagonist tries to live out his own life the way he wants to, despite being labeled as evil by those around him. Due to this constant criticism by his peers, he develops an inferiority complex that he desperately tries to make up for as the story progresses. Throughout his development, Grendel very rapidly moves past his existentialist beginning, through a brief phase of forced skepticism, and into a severely nihilistic point of view.
Throughout the novel, this monster, Grendel, seems confused as to whether he wants to view life like his existentialistic dragon mentor, or like the ignorantly optimistic humans on which he feeds. At times he is captivated by the romantic songs of the Shaper, and feels no desire to kill, while at others he thrives on the "knowledge" of the dragon, and goes on bloody rampages. At one point during Grendel's insecure state, the dragon tells him something that changes his outlook, and gives him a new feeling of self-worth.
Many may contend that the novel’s main character, Grendel, is guilty of evil by virtue of his vile actions. However, Gardner’s description of Grendel’s resistance to evil impulses and capability of human emotions suggest that Grendel is simply responding to his environment. Furthermore, Gardner deftly accrues readers’ sympathies towards Grendel, making it difficult for the empathetic reader to condemn the monster ex officio. By forging connections between humanity and his protagonist, Gardner indicates that readers are equally as guilty of sin as Grendel. Through this implication, he insinuates that humans are unqualified to judge Grendel’s actions, and, perhaps, each other. After all, if Grendel can be called evil, can the same not be said of all of mankind? The novel’s ultimate truth seems to harken back to Tupac Shakur’s assertion that, “Only God can judge me,” (Tupac
John Gardner’s Grendel portrays a monster searching for his purpose in life. The characters know the meaning of their lives, but Grendel tries to discover his role and what life has to offer him. Grendel discovers his identity through other characters’ actions and beliefs. In Grendel, John Gardner illustrates the contrasting views of each character to show their view of society and the influence they have on Grendel.
Grendel is born a neutral being, perhaps even good, but nevertheless, without hate. The transition which he undergoes to become evil is due to misunderstandings between himself and humans and also meeting with a dragon who is questionably evil. As a young “monster”, Grendel knew nothing other than the cave he lived in and his mother who could not speak any distinguishable language. He was a playful creature who seemed to be like a “bla...
...n very human feelings of resentment and jealousy. Grendel was an unstable and saddened figure because of his outcast status. Though Grendel had many animal attributes and a grotesque, monstrous appearance, he seemed to be guided by vaguely human emotions and impulses. He truthfully showed more of an interior life than one might expect. Exiled to the swamplands outside the boundaries of human society, Grendel’s depiction as an outcast is a symbol of the jealousy and hate that seeks to destroy others' happiness and can ultimately cripple a civilization. This take on the outcast archetype ultimately exposes the Anglo Saxon people’s weaknesses, their doubts and anxieties towards the traditional values that bounded nearly every aspect of their life.
{1} Grendel, it seems, actually didn’t have too much exposure to humans before the start of the poem. He “hunted the moors” (17), likely subsisting on animals he had killed. The reasons why he started killing humans aren’t entirely clear; he had “growled in pain, impatient / As day after day the music rang / Loud in that hall” (2-4). He could also come across as merely curious, as he was “wondering what the warriors would do in that hall” (31-32). This raises a noteworthy attribute of Grendel – though he is often animalistic, he frequently is described as thinking, wondering, or otherwise displaying a human-like nature. The humans think of him not as a raging beast, but as a calculating criminal. But how calculated were these crimes? Grendel doesn’t seem to have planned his war on Herot, especially not that first night. The statements “[Grendel’s] Thoughts were as quick as his greed of his claws” (35) and “delighted with his night’s slaughter” (40) give the
Grendel is the embodiment of all that is evil and dark. He is a descendant of Cain and like Cain is an outcast of society. He is doomed to roam in the shadows. He is always outside looking inside. He is an outside threat to the order of society and all that is good. His whole existence is grounded solely in the moral perversion to hate good simply because it is good.
The first example is the meeting with the dragon. The conversation with the Dragon foreshadows Grendel’s decision of being an anti hero, The Dragon seemingly knowing Grendel’s troubles, decides to deprave and completely tear apart the good within Grendel. Grendel begins to fit the trait of an anti heroism through desperation of wanting to change himself even if it can lead to harming others. The Dragon teaches Grendel that his only purpose in life is by thwarting every fixed system and to fundamentally act as an adversary against humanity. The Dragon also explains to Grendel that without his existence then there would be no human advancement, “Can’t you see that yourself? You stimulate them! You make them think and scheme. You drive them to poetry, science and religion, all you makes them what they are for as long as they last”(Gardner 72-73). The discussion with the Dragon, gives Grendel a reason to exterminate others rather than for self complacency. Another example is his view of the Sharper’s song, Grendel becomes addicted to the Sharper’s song, which creates a sense of sorrow and desperation for acceptance. He tries to change his ways by reproaching and rethinking the ideals of mankind, however he is eventually turned down, which forces Grendel to willingly accepts himself as the descent of Cain from the song of the Sharper . Grendel personally envies the sharper and tries to be like him, “Yet he, the old sharper, might make it true, by the sweetness of his harp, his cunning trickery. It came to me with a fierce jolt that I wanted it”(Gardner 55). After frequently listening to more of the sharper’s song, Grendel begins to learn more about humanity and how they react and live their lives. This causes Grendel to spend time to realize the flaw of his persona and decides to accept the fact that humans loathe him because he is different and
...zes humanity in this scene by portraying them as the evil beings instead of Grendel who is the helpless victim of their savage assault. The men attack Grendel solely because they could not understand him and because of his appearance. Grendel makes no attempt to harm the men but to communicate with them while they are the ones that savagely tried to kill him. John Gardner portrays the men as the real monsters who mercilessly tried to kill Grendel while he was defenseless. Grendel has another revelation due to this attack in where he states. “The world resists me and I resist the world… “That’s all there is.”(Gardner, 28) Grendel makes this assertion as a means to organized the ways he perceives the world. While he once saw the world as a confusing array of frightening images, now he can separate the world into categories: those who do not resemble him and himself.