Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does religion impact literature
How does religion impact literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does religion impact literature
Arbitrary Hierarchies
The wisdom of God is said to be of ultimate totality, and a prophet, according to Hebrew and Christian scriptures, is the means through which he relays this wisdom to the people. But what constitutes God’s selections? Are prophets spiritually superior to the common man? Are some prophets more powerful than others, or does God, in effect, distribute the same amount of power to all of his prophets? Is there, in other words, a hierarchy and if so are the reasons for it contingent upon the individual, or the situation that God commands him/her to handle? The answer to these questions, and many like them, are subject to debate, but from a literary standpoint few will argue that there is indeed a physical hierarchy of prophets. What this inquiry is primarily concerned with, are the grounds for such a hierarchy within the context of Hebrew Scriptures and Christian Gospels. What it will propose, moreover, is that the unequal distribution of power is contingent upon the situation, not the status of the individuals selected. Prophets, messianic or otherwise, are merely mechanisms through which God handles the situation, not all-powerful emissaries as they’re commonly perceived. The suggestion of a hierarchy stems from the addition of the term Messiah to the term Prophet, in the following analysis both of these terms will be described within the beliefs of their respective religions.
“I will put my words into the mouth of the prophet who shall speak to them everything that I command” (Dt, 18:18). Prophecy is said to be the voice of God, and a prophet is simply God’s ambassador, relaying the word of God to the people. However, it is not by any means his/her choice, for once a prophet is called upon by God and com...
... middle of paper ...
... I am the Lord” (Ex, 14:15-17). Here it is obvious that God is trying to make an emphatic point to the people of Egypt, and Israel, so he gives Moses the superhuman power to part an entire sea. In a contrasting instance, God takes power away from Moses and spreads it upon seventy elders to lighten the burden (Nu, 11:25-6). Therefore, the distribution of power, or the hierarchy of power, is rather arbitrary, making the so-called hierarchy a false one. If the power can indeed be given to, or taken away from, anyone, at any given time, than the vessel in which the power is carried is inconsequential. What is consequential, however, is the situation that requires the power to be used in the first place. Thus, there is no true hierarchy, there only appears to be one on the account of the physical attributions and classifications we often asses to people and situations.
ASDA's Hierarchial Structure A hierarchical structure has many levels. Each level is controlled by one person. A hierarchical company tends to be a very big company just like ASDA is. In a hierarchical company, instructions are generally passed down from one person to another until it gets to the bottom.
The role of the prophet changes with the society in which he lives. In modern society, a prophet is a visionary, telling people what they can become; in Biblical times, a prophet was the voice of God, telling his people what they had to become to fulfill their covenant with God. In William Golding's Lord of the Flies, the prophet is a peaceful lad, Simon. He alone saw that the jungle, which represented freedom and the lack of civilization, was not to be feared but to be understood; he alone knew that the mythical Beast of the island, feared by all the boys, was, in fact, their own inherent savagery. Through these truths Simon represents a Christ figure paralleling Christ's misunderstood message and Christ's death.
Theologian Vern S. Poythress wrote, “Theological systems, whether dispensationalist, covenantal, Calvinist, Arminian, or even modernist, have a profound influence on the way we approach a given [biblical] text.” There is no portion of scripture that is more influenced by the theological system of dispensationalist than that of biblical prophecy, particularly in the area of God’s redemptive plan from for humanity. The purpose of this essay is to establish that an appropriate understanding of biblical eschatology can best be achieved through a dispensational theological perspective.
Though the book of Jeremiah contains oracles, poetry and metaphors, his use of metaphors makes him similar to Jesus talking to people in parables. As the narration is in “the first person,” the Collegeville commentary examines the statement “The word of the Lord” pointing to Jeremiah’s speech and considering it “as if he were God speaking.” Since Jeremiah’s words depict a narrative mode of the conversation that took place between Yahweh and him, the Collegeville commentary perceives it as the words of speech by a messenger that are spoken on behalf of a king. In this case, Jeremiah is the messenger, because he is the prophet and metaphorically speaking, the king is Yahweh.
In chapter two Johnson deals with the fulfillment of the Torah and how Luke uses prophecy as a literature shape. Chapter three however is what really sets the reader up for the “meat” of the book. In chapter three he talks about the characteristics of a prophet. The first key characteristic for a prophet he says is being led by the spirit of God. In order to support this claim he gives many examples of prophets such as Moses, Ezekiel, and Elijah who all had the Holy Spirit to empower them as they did Gods work. The second element to a prophet is speaking Gods word to humans. Not only do prophets do the work of God but they will also speak for him. I find Johnsons main example Moses to be the most helpful when looking at this step of the prophet. This is because countless times God spoke to Moses and then Moses would tell the Israelites. This key characteristic goes well with the third characteristic that the prophet embodies God’s word. Countless times we see Moses doing this throughout the Old Testament. An example of this is in Exodus 20:1 when God tells Moses the ten commandments that he passes on to his people by carving them into stone. The fourth characteristic of the prophet is working to make humanity into God’s vision for it. Moses again shows this characteristic by appointing elders to help watch over the Israelites in Exodus 18. The final distinguishing trait for
Throughout the text of the Bible, and especially evident in Chapter 3 of Genesis, there is a system which God has set up to denote the proper relationships each of his creations share with each other and with Him. An analysis of this reoccurring theme will help to establish that God’s intended system is a hierarchy in which there is an apportionment of “servants” and “masters,” with God having the final authority. This motif is first introduced in chapter 1 of Genesis where God sees that His creations are “good,” already establishing a higher standard, “good,” from a lower one, “bad.” In the system that follows, the hierarchy runs with God foremost as the creator; then humans come next as subservient to God, but are put in charge of ruling
3.Prophecy:D=Prophecy is a process in which one or more messages that have been communicated to a prophet[1] are then communicated to others.C=A Message that tells the future. This entire book is based off of a prophecy.
In addition, The Messiah would also be a prophet like Moses. A specific example comes from Deuteronomy 18 and is quoted in Acts: “For Moses said, ‘The Lord your God will raise up for you another prophet like me from among your own people; you must listen to everything he tells you’” (Acts 3:22). Because Jesus was known as a great teacher, the author of Acts believed that Jesus was the prophet who Moses was foretelling would arrive.
LaHaye, Tim F., and Edward E. Hindson. The Popular Encyclopedia of Bible Prophecy. (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 2004.
This paper will compare the concept of the Messiah within Judaism and the development of the messianic tradition within Christianity. Consideration will be given to Judaic thought on how this religion understands the concept of the Messiah. Defining how throughout history it shaped the foundation of this religion to distinguish its own individual identity. Analysis will focus on the abstraction of the Messiah and how Jewish believers interpret the coming of the Mashiach in connection with the prophecy of Isaiah. Discussing how eschatology is understood in this religion compared to Christianity, and how different Jewish groups define the Messiah prophecy from early history up until the modern day era. The paper will also discuss the development of the Messianic tradition within Christianity, focusing on the prophets, Jesus and how the messianic period is defined in Christian theology; in order to establish if the son of God has arrived in this world and fulfilled his promise through death and resurrection, or if the messiah and the messianic age is still yet to come as understood in Judaism.
There are many prophets and important figures in the Bible that stand out as being influential and necessary when it comes to the words God gave them. For instance, the prophet Amos is unique for his honest and brutal relaying of Yahweh’s message to the Israelites. The major theme of this prophecy was directed toward the northern kingdom of Israel. Yahweh gave Amos this message directly in order for Amos to inform the rich of their sins of moral injustice towards the poor. For this, it is important to understand who Amos was and the context of his book that put forth the message of Yahweh.
The offices of Christ resemble the natures of the Godhead, in that they are three in one, yet still distinct in their nature. The offices are prophet, priest, and king. In the Old Testament the same person sometimes occupied more than one of these offices, nevertheless the officese were still distinct. (For example, Moses was a priest and a prophet, and David was a prophet and a king). Even as far back as the Old Testament Moses and others prophesied about the coming of Jesus as Prophet, Priest, and King. Deut. 18:15 says “Thy Lord thy God will rause up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me.” It was prophesied he would act as a Prophet by revealing the will of God. A priest as Psalm 110:4 says, “Thou art a priest forever after the order of
d. Who else is called a prophet or prophetess in the Pentateuch (use concordance or biblegateway.org)?
God’s goodness and mercy far transcends the comprehension of the most brilliant human mind! He “who stoops down to look on the heavens and the earth”(Psalm 113:6).Yet in His infinite love for us He stoops down to reveal Himself to us by a multitude of illustration, types, and shadows, so that we may learn to know him. This paper will describe what is meant by the Kingdom of God; examine the religious philosophy of the various sects of Judaism during the Second Temple period: Pharisee, Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots, describe the religious philosophy and political philosophy of each sects, it will also describe how the Messianic expectation differ from the Messianic role that Jesus presented, and include an exegesis of the temptation of Jesus and how other sects defined the Messiah.
I want to introduce one of minor prophets ,Zechariah, His name means “God has remembered.” Through the names of his family, especially his, his father’s, and his grandfather’s, it can be made “God will remember his people and bless them in his determined time.” He was contemporary with Haggai in post-exile and functioned as priest and head of a Father’s house. He was prophesying to the people of Southern Judah to build the Temple. God showed him some visions to make them repent, and Zechariah prophesied that Jesus Christ who is going to reign the world is coming soon.