Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle contribution to philosophy
The Art and Science of Persuasion english 111 essay paper
Meaning and art of persuasion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle contribution to philosophy
History of Persuasion
Sophists were itinerate teachers of ancient Greece who taught the art of rhetoric claiming they could teach anyone to persuade. Sophists claimed that once their students had learned the art they could control the state and wealth (Waldman, 2013, para. 1). In Plato’s script, Gorgias, a well-known Sophist, and Socrates engage in a debate regarding the ethics of persuasion, including debating rhetoric dialog as an art (Gorgias).
Gorgias (483-375 B.C.E.) was an itinerant orator and philosopher, famous for his particular style of oration which was elaborate and rhyming seeming to mesmerize his listeners. Gorgias powers of persuasion were legendary ("Gorgias," 2008). Works attributed to Gorgias are On Nature, only a partial manuscript, which explores the nature of being, Apology of Palamedes, an important contribution to explanatory argument, Encomium on Helen, two slightly different copies exist, and Eptaphiosor (or Athenian Funeral) (Higgins, n.d., p. 1).
Gorgias did not seem to recognize truth as a universal principle, but something that applied in the moment. This belief about truth seems to support his own statement claiming that a properly delivered argument could change what the recipient believed, either for or against. Gorgias did maintain there was an ethical limitation on rhetoric argument,
“the duty of the same man both to declare what he should rightly and to refute what has been spoken falsely” (Higgins, n.d., p. 1).
The term sophists originally was the title for teachers and philosophers who charged their students a fee to learn their particular rhetoric (Duke, n.d.). Many sophists catered to the wealthy, becoming wealthy themselves. In the newly awakening democracy of Athens the claim many so...
... middle of paper ...
...are not the only careers utilizing rhetoric, although they may be the first to come to mind. Any career that requires convincing communication needs to be familiar with the methods of rhetoric.
References
. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.audioenglish.org/dictionary/sophistry.htm
Duke, G. (n.d.). The Sophists. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/sophists/
Gorgias. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.philosophybasics.com/philosophers_gorgias.html
Higgins, C. F. (n.d.). Gorgias (483-375 B.C.E.). Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/gorgias/
Kenny, Sir, A. J. (2013). Aristotle. In An article about Aristotle. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/topic/34560/websites
Noah S. Sweat. (2013). In Wikipedia. Retrieved April 22, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah_S._Sweat
Waldman, T. (2013). Gorgias by Plato. In .Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia: .
Effectively communicating an idea or opinion requires several language techniques. In his study of rhetoric, Aristotle found that persuasion was established through three fundamental tools. One is logos, which is used to support an argument through hard data and statistics. Another is ethos, which is the credibility of an author or speaker that allows an audience to conclude from background information and language selection a sense of knowledge and expertise of the person presenting the argument. The impact of pathos, however, is the most effective tool in persuasion due to the link between emotions and decisions. Although each of these tools can be effective individually, a combination of rhetorical devices when used appropriately has the ability to sway an audience toward the writer’s point of view.
In Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pathos, logos and ethos are evidently and effectively used to persuade the audience into believing Caesar was not ambitious and that he was an innocent man. Throughout the speech the citizens were easily persuaded, but Anthony’s intellectual speeches made the audience question and imagine what they have turned into. Anthony used these three rhetorical appeals to win back the citizens just like many people do today. The power of pathos, logos and ethos in a speech can change one mind in an instant and if successfully used can change a mind to be fully persuaded without confusion.
Rhetorical appeals apply to everyday life and the three sections of the rhetoric’s cover all elements of persuasion. Moore and Machiavelli do an outstanding job of explaining their points and why you should believe what they are saying. Both author’s did a great job of educating and informing their viewers although they were two significantly different pieces. Moore and Machiavelli’s work are each their own with respect to purpose and lessons but they also both come together in regards to using Aristotle’s three rhetorical appeals.
To him, the logical, thinking consciousness of a human being should always control the spirit or emotions. Aristotle, Plato’s student, discovered an important place for emotion, though, when he examined public speaking. In his studies, he realized that appeals to emotion, or pathos, played an almost equal part to logic in persuading an audience to act or think differently. Now, it seems that Aristotle’s ideas overcame Plato’s because, in the 20th century, philosopher Peter Singer practices Aristotle’s important teachings on rhetoric in his editorial “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” published in the New York Times Magazine, about the ethical contradictions that allow us to ignore the hunger and suffering of the world’s poor. Logos, of course, is an important strategy for any philosopher. Singer, though, through his hypothetical narrations, the juggling of facts and statistics, and comparisons of middle class luxuries to human necessities, appeals to the guilt of affluent Americans, convincing them that the attainment of luxuries is petty and selfish compared to the needs of the world’s
Isocrates did not appreciate the teaching methods or claims of the Sophists. When Isocrates wrote Against the Sophists, He was highly critically of the teaching methods of the Sophists. Isocrates used kairos and prepon in his teachings , both of which the Sophists lacked. The textbook indicates Isocrates views on teaching from “ Discourses designed to rally audiences to traditional values, perspectives, and behaviors”. Unlike the Sophists Isocrates felt he was obligated to teach not only his students but also Greece society. For example " he did so in his letters and treatises, such as panegyricus and Aeropagiticus". Both philosophers and sophist influenced Isocrates. In the textbook Isocrates states “ those who profess to teach political discourse. For the latter have no interest whatever in the truth, but consider that they are masters of an art”. In Against the Sophists Isocrates indicates these sophist preach the power of rhetoric but they fail to mention the art form in which it takes to make rhetoric profound. To become a true philosopher one must aim to achieve education that will develop the wisdom needed. The Sophists were never going to give a student the education needed to receive true
Clark (2016) suggests that rhetoric isn’t limited to oral communication, but currently has a permanent foothold in written works: magazine or newspaper excerpts, novels, and scientific reports. Not only written
The meaning of sophist, is one who used his smarts to later manipulate reality, and Socrates did that, because many young men learned from Socrates, but Socrates later stated that he knew nothing.
To begin, Plato’s view of rhetoric stems from his theory of the nature of reality known as Platonic realism. He argues that there are true forms of ideas that exist in a higher realm of being and thought. Essentially, there is a perfect template for every idea in the universe, including such concepts as good, justice and knowledge. These templates are the true abstract qualities of these ideas that individuals of the material realm cannot directly perceive with the senses, and so everything that exists within the worldly realm is actually a flawed copy or reflection of those perfect ideals, or absolutes. Basically, it is the qualities of an idea that make it what it is. For example, suppose one were to take the qualities of being a chair and deconstruct all the ideas there are about what chairs should be, thereby determining what constitutes “chairness”. This would eventually eliminate all the flaws that a chair could have, and then result in a concept of the perfect chair – or a true template. Furthermore, only someone with a highly trained ...
Socrates was accused of being a sophist because he was "engaging in inquiries into things beneath the earth and in the heavens, of making the weaker argument appear the stronger," and "teaching others these same things." (Apology, Plato, Philosophic Classics page 21) Socrates is also accused of denying the existence of the gods, and corrupting the youth. Socrates goes about trying to prove his innocence. The jury that Socrates was tried by was made up of 501 Athenian citizens of all classes of society. While he fails to convince the Athenian jury of his innocence, he does a wonderful job in this effort. I personally believe that Socrates is innocent, and that the Athenian jury made the wrong decision.
Socrates was a traveling teacher and talked and challenged everyone he met. Socrates taught the art of persuasive speaking. He did not charge people money like most of the other Sophists did, but he did have similar beliefs as the Sophists. Sophists thought that our minds are cut off from reality and that we are stuck in our own opinions of what the world was like. Socrates believed that reason or nature could not tell us why the world is the way it appears. The Sophists' point of view is best summed up as this: we can never step out of the way things appear.
Plato's rhetoric uses dialogue and dialectic as a means of making meaning known. Anthony Petruzzi says that Plato’s “Truth is neither a correspondence with an "objective" reality, nor does it exist solely as a coherent relation to a set of social beliefs; rather, truth is concomitantly a revealing and a concealing, or a withdrawing arrival” (Petruzzi 6). However, for Plato truth becomes a matter of correspondence or correctness in “the agreement of the mental concept (or representation) with the thing” (Petruzzi 7). In other words, the tr...
There are three ways that people used to try and persuade their audiences. The three ways were identified by Greek philosopher Aristotle, and they are known as ethos, logos, and pathos. They are three examples of rhetorical arguments. Ethos refers to how we view the speaker’s character. This means that if you believe that the character has good knowledge of the subject and good intentions along with good character, you are prone to believe what he is telling you. Logos uses inductive and deductive reasoning along with rationality to persuade the audience. Most speakers aren’t going to use logos alone to persuade the general audience. Pathos persuades the audience by playing with their emotions. The speaker will try to make you feel emotions such as anger, fear, hunger, sadness, pity, and happiness to influence your judgement.
In the retelling of his trial by his associate, Plato, entitled “The Apology”; Socrates claims in his defense that he only wishes to do good for the polis. I believe that Socrates was innocent of the accusations that were made against him, but he possessed contempt for the court and displayed that in his conceitedness and these actions led to his death.
Rhetoric is the art of effective speaking or writing, and persuasion. Most people use rhetoric numerous of times in their everyday life without their concern or knowing.
To get a sense of what an education was intended for we must look at the ancient Greek society. The philosophers like the Sophist, Socrates, and Plato were a major part of the Greek society and the rest of the world. Take the Sophist for example, these scholars who would, for a fee, travel to give public lectures on such subjects as math, grammar, rhetoric, ethics and science. For the citizens, lectures were not only an educational experience, it was also considered a form of ...