Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Apologetics essay two
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Apologetics essay two
Can an auto run without a generator? So also, of God's world. Apologetics is not apologies. It is the art of defending the faith. It accounts for our hopes. If human beings tried to invent God, they would never come up with one that died on a cross to save us. He who is love could not help but love us! He chose the way of the cross to save us. Imperfection doesn't deny the truth of faith in God; e.g. contented Catholics and Protestants, brain-washed jihadists, largely negative Limbaughs, dull of faith Dawkins and Dennett. "Fools say to themselves: 'there is no God!'" (Ps.14:1) Ever seen a quark or a nano? A scientist proceeds with both faith in the unseen and his data. Science and religion lean on each other. "Faith and reason are …show more content…
A golden censer held by an angel at the altar. A LONG WAY OFF!
Creation, Natural reason, Revelation, and the Bible in the Divine Economy by which God reveals His plan. Cosmic covenant for the obedient and faithful. WHITHER THY GOAL?
Justified by faith in God's grace as gift; Imperfect church of imperfect people come to the messianic mission and the Eucharistic banquet. WE BECOME GOD'S CHILDREN!
Peals of thunder and flashes of lightening; Blessed are those who die in the Lord joining the collective of God's holy ones. COME TO ME, MY DELIGHT wonder./write/discuss
1. No one has all the answers. Where do you go to get answers to your questions of faith?
2. Do Catholics really honor or worship icons, or honor the person of the icon? Do you believe in the literal interpretation of the creation story in Genesis? What literary genres can you identify in the
…show more content…
Therese of Lisieux translated by Alan Bancroft)
Recall O Jesus, Word of Life, to show your love, You died for me! and so I, too Wish in return to love You, madly - oh! I, also, wish to live and die for you. You know it, O my God! My one desire's to make You loved and then to be a martyr for your sake! Of love I wish to die; Lord, I want this, I beg You recall.
Though Sacrament of Love, You have your foes . . . In spite of all the blasphemies You face . . . You show how much You love me--for You chose To come and make my heart Your dwelling place! Divine and holy Host! Yourself as Bread You give: I live no longer I, it's by Your life I live, Ciborium of gold most dear to You, Jesus my All.
My wish is to console you in your pain My only Love! oh, grant me this to gain - To have a thousand hearts for loving You! Too few! Let Beauty then this greater grace impart: Give me, to love You with the Heart of God - Your heart! This, my desire (for I'm afire, and all the time!) O Lord, recall.
3 ARDENT
Science and faith are generally viewed as two topics that do not intermingle. However, Andy Crouch’s work, Delight in Creation, suggests that there is an approach to both faith and science that allows support of scientists in the church community. There is an approach that can regard science as a career that can reflect the nature of God.
"For our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet!"
The problem of reconciling an omnipotent, perfectly just, perfectly benevolent god with a world full of evil and suffering has plagued believers since the beginning of religious thought. Atheists often site this paradox in order to demonstrate that such a god cannot exist and, therefore, that theism is an invalid position. Theodicy is a branch of philosophy that seeks to defend religion by reconciling the supposed existence of an omnipotent, perfectly just God with the presence of evil and suffering in the world. In fact, the word “theodicy” consists of the Greek words “theos,” or God, and “dike,” or justice (Knox 1981, 1). Thus, theodicy seeks to find a sense of divine justice in a world filled with suffering.
I confess to God and God has seen my name on this!…It is my name! I cannot have another in my life! 142-143
I give to you, that you love one another; just as I have loved you, you also are to love one
Science and Religion dialogue has been a bitter-sweet topic for many people over the years. The controversy is not only common between one sole community, but affects a variety. The beliefs held about these topics has the potential to personally effect an individual, whether it be positively or negatively. In the United States, we draw only a fine line between religion and science, often failing to realize that the two benefit each other in copious ways but are not meant to interpreted in the same way. Due to this perspective, people seem to be influenced to pick one or the other, when in reality we should treat both science and religion with the same respect and recognize that they are completely separate from one another, along with having individual purposes. John F. Haught, a distinguished research professor at Georgetown University, published a book titled, “Science & Religion: From Conflict to Conversation”. In it he evaluates each side, persuading the reader that the truth is that both realms may benefit from each other despite the differences emphasized. John F. Haught introduces his audience with four approaches on Science and Religion. Haught’s third approach, contact, is of major significance to aid in the response of: “Does Science Rule out a Personal God?”
“First, there is the call to be a Christian. Second, for each individual there is a specific call—a defining purpose or mission, a reason for being. Every individual is called of God to respond through service in the world. Third, there is the call that we face each day in response to the multiple demands on our lives—our immediate duties and responsibilities” (Smith, ...
Holy Bible: Contemporary English Version. New York: American Bible Society, 1995. Print. (BS195 .C66 1995)
Religion and science are complementary elements to our society. The notion that religion and science should not be merged together, does not mean neglecting to understand the parallel relation between these two concepts and will result in a better understanding of our surroundings. This will put an end to our scientific research and advancement because we will be relying on answers provided by religious books to answer our questions. If we don’t argue whether these answers are right or wrong, we would never have studied space stars or the universe or even our environment and earthly animals. These studies have always provided us with breakthroughs, inventions and discoveries that made our lives better.
Many atheists have used science as a way to disapprove the existence of God. Science is not an accurate way of disapproving the existence of God(2). Scient...
"For I know thou art' full of love and honesty and weigh'st thy words before thou gives't them breath.
While some people may believe that science and religion differ drastically, science and religion both require reason and faith respectively. Religion uses reason as a way of learning and growing in one’s faith. Science, on the other hand, uses reason to provide facts and explain different hypotheses. Both, though, use reason for evidence as a way of gaining more knowledge about the subject. Although science tends to favor more “natural” views of the world, religion and science fundamentally need reason and faith to obtain more knowledge about their various subjects. In looking at science and religion, the similarities and differences in faith and reason can be seen.
Mr. Kowatch, As you already know, I am trying to switch my bible class from New Testament to Apologetics. I talked to Mr. Webster about it, and he completely understood my reasoning. I understand that I as a student am required to take a course over Jesus. However, I believe that students should be able to take the Bible class they desire. I took Old Testament last semester, and the class did not fit well with my learning style.
This never ending thirst for the unquenchable…or as I thought. One drop may seem umcompraringly unsatisfying. One drop of grace gives you provides me with this overwhelmingl sense of a new day, a new horizon, a delicate fire being enflamed into this uncontrollable need for you Lord. Your never failing love is beautiful but its incredible how your creation takes it for granted. Takes it in vain.
When considering the basis for the understanding of both science and religion it is interesting to distinguish that both are based on an overwhelming desire to define a greater knowledge, and comprehension of the universe that surrounds us. Now while, science has based its knowledge of experimental basis, researcher, and scholarly work; religion