Anwar Al-Awlaki Analysis

2040 Words5 Pages

Louis 1965 wrote this; This group is ruthless in their use of religious suffrage, religious imagery, and religious tradition. They oppress the poor and the weak and push their ideals on others through force and terror. They steal and hang and beat and whip and burn and rape, woman and children and men. They pervert their religion and use it to instill fear, people shudder at their name, at their mere mention. We run but we cannot hide, we are dragged from our houses in the dead of night, we call for help, but tour neighbors curtains are drawn and our screams are silent in wake of our grisly deaths. They bomb and kill without mercy or remorse in the name of their ideals and they laugh at they play target practice with children. This group is not unknown, they live among us, hiding in their skin, yet they are not classified as terrorists or monsters, but rather as heroes. …show more content…

The film “Dirty wars” shows the transition of al-Awlaki from a peacemaker in full sympathy with the U.S, to a cheerleader for the jihadists against the West. The drone strike that killed al-Awlaki was a turning point to the darkest side of the dark side. And under the Authorization of Military Use of Force act, presidents are allowed to select for elimination any American citizen suspected of terrorist ties, so who's next to step out of their front door into the path of a Hellfire missile? Al-Awlaki's death might not move too many people who find al-Qaeda associates automatically fit for destruction, but what of his 16 year-old son, a friendly suburban 16 year old from Denver with no terrorist ties? A CIA-devised attack killed him, too. But, isn't it illegal to persecute the family, even if they are related to “terrorists?” Isn't that in America’s highly-quoted

Open Document