Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
International relations concepts
International relations concepts
Impact of globalization on international relations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: International relations concepts
The International Relations textbook written by Joshua S. Goldstein and Jon C. W. Pevehouse describe international relations as "The relationships among the world's state governments and the connection of those relationships with other actors (such as the United Nations, multinational corporations, ad individuals), with other social relationships (including economics, culture, and domestic politics), and with geographic and historical influences." (Goldstein and Pevehouse 2) Many international relations theorists date the contemporary system of from 1648, the year of the Treaty of Westphalia, ending the Thirty Years War. (Mingst and Arreguin-Toft Ch. 2) Three key events of the 20th century that shaped the contemporary system of International
Relations are World War 1, World War 2, and the Cold War. Each of these three conflicts caused ripples throughout the international world and helped form the International system we have today. World War 1 demolished empires, constructed numerous new nation-states, encouraged independence movements in Europe's colonies, forced the United States to become a world power and led directly to Soviet communism and the rise of Hitler. The war broke out in 1914. There is said to be four main causes for the break out of the war, however, it was triggered by the assassination of the Austria archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife. Treaties and Alliances, Imperialism, Militarism, and Nationalism are the four main causes of the First World War. Russia was the first state to crumble; A revolution at home extracted Russia from the war in 1917 (and led to the founding of the Soviet Union). When the United States entered the war on the anti-German side, a defeat for Germany was close on the horizon. The Treaty of Versailles was distributed in 1919, Germany was dictated to give up territory, pay reparations, limit its future armaments, and admit guilt for the war. Pevehouse and Goldstein say that, "German resentment against the harsh terms of Versailles would contribute to Adolf Hitler's rise to power in the 1930's." (Pevehouse and Goldstein 22)
To understand the international relations of contemporary society and how and why historically states has acted in such a way in regarding international relations, the scholars developed numerous theories. Among these numerous theories, the two theories that are considered as mainstream are liberalism and realism because the most actors in stage of international relations are favouring either theories as a framework and these theories explains why the most actors are taking such actions regarding foreign politics. The realism was theorized in earlier writings by numerous historical figures, however it didn't become main approach to understand international relations until it replaced idealist approach following the Great Debate and the outbreak of Second World War. Not all realists agrees on the issues and ways to interpret international relations and realism is divided into several types. As realism became the dominant theory, idealistic approach to understand international relations quickly sparked out with failure of the League of Nation, however idealism helped draw another theory to understand international relations. The liberalism is the historical alternative to the realism and like realism, liberalism has numerous branches of thoughts such as neo-liberalism and institutional liberalism. This essay will compare and contrast the two major international relations theories known as realism and liberalism and its branches of thoughts and argue in favour for one of the two theories.
“International Agreements.” The Concise Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Third Edition. 1994: Columbia University Press. Lanouette, William. A. “Why We Dropped the Bomb.”
Kent, J. and Young, J.W. (2013), International Relations Since 1945: A global History. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
In order for countries to cohesively overcome international barriers, frameworks of ideal political standards must be established. Two of these frameworks constantly discussed in international relations are the theories of Neo-realism and Liberalism; two theories with their own outlook at the way politicians should govern their country as well as how they should deal with others. Neo-realism lies on the structural level, emphasizing on anarchy and the balance of power as a dominant factor in order to maintain hierarchy in international affairs. In contrast, Liberalism's beliefs are more permissive, focusing on the establishments of international organizations, democracy, and trade as links to strengthen the chain of peace amongst countries. Liberalism provides a theory that predominantly explains how states can collaborate in order to promote global peace; however, as wars have been analyzed, for example World War II, the causes of them are better explained by Neo-realist beliefs on the balance of power and states acting as unitary actors. Thus, looking out for their own self interest and security.
Diplomacy is the art and practice of conducting negotiations between nations, or skill in handling affairs without arousing hostility (Merriam-Webster.) Diplomacy had effectively affected the rise of the modern state during 1648-1715. The first change that it brought was through the treaty of Westphalia, which allowed state to operate important transformations in their structure. Westphalia treaty had allowed “Signatories of treaties to be freed perpetually, to make alliances with strangers for their preservation or safety, and each of the contracting parties of this treaty shall be held to defend a...
The first paradigm of international relations is the theory of Realism. Realism is focused on ideas of self-interest and the balance of power. Realism is also divided into two categories, classical realism and neo-realism. Famous political theorist, Hans Morgenthau was a classical realist who believed that national interest was based on three elements, balance of power, military force, and self interest (Kleinberg 2010, 32). He uses four levels of analysis to evaluate the power of a state. The first is that power and influence are not always the same thing. Influence means the ability to affect the decision of those who have the power to control outcomes and power is the ability to determine outcomes. An example of influence and power would be the UN’s ability to influence the actions of states within the UN but the state itself has the power to determine how they act. Morgenthau goes on to his next level of analysis in which he explains the difference in force and power in the international realm. Force is physical violence, the use of military power but power is so much more than that. A powerful state can control the actions of another state with the threat of force but not actually need to physical force. He believed that the ability to have power over another state simply with the threat of force was likely to be the most important element in analysis the power of as state (Kleinberg 2010, 33-34).
During the Twentieth-Century, there were several dramatic economic changes and events. Going from being a complete agricultural nation to being an industrial super, enduring a great depression, having a civil rights movement and so many more, the 20th Century carries the names of some of the world’s most important events. Although history has flourished with all of its game changers, the solute most important event of the 1900’s was World War 2. The second world war, just decades after the first, “was the most widespread and deadliest war in history, involving more than 300 countries and resulting in more than 50 million military and civilian dead,” according to History.com. After World War I had ended, the peace settlement known as the Treaty of Versailles, created in 1919, had a purpose of obligating Germany to relinquish territories to Belgium, Czechoslovakia, and Poland. However these new territories were very susceptible to aggression from its neighboring countries, Germany and the Soviet Union. During this time there was still a great deal of tension between the countries/ territories. Italy and Japan viewed the treaty as a failure to acknowledge the status of the two’s world powers. Also Germans saw that rather than being defeated at the close of World War I, they were betrayed. With the economy being exceptionally deprived and a great deal of political instability, this set the stage for dictatorships that according to Twentieth-Century America “offered territorial expansion by military conquest as a way to redress old rivalries, dominate trade and gain access to raw materials”. Countries such as Japan began making use of propaganda’s stressing that Japans “greatness” must be reassured. Italy’s Fascist dictator, Benito Mus...
To conclude, indeed there are veracities in Waltz arguments, but also there are limitations which cannot totally explain how the international system interacts with actors from different levels. The features of the world after the Cold War do not resemble what the world is today. Phenomenon such as integration, interdependence among states and the creation of international instruments are the result of states' behavior which are constantly shaping the world politics. Therefore, one theoretical ideology by itself will not fully explain the progressive changes in the international system, taking into account that states do influence in the international system.
The discipline of IR was officially established after World War 1 with a view to avoiding future mass conflicts and ensuring peaceful change. This remains a worthy goal, but today the scope and complexities of world politics demand an understanding of a much wider range of issues. Moreover, new conceptual frameworks and theories are required to improve our understanding and assist in the development of better policies and practices. International relation theory is often taught as a theory that seeks both to explain past state behavior and to predict future state behavior. However, even that definition is contested by many theorists. Traditional IR theories can generally be categorized by their focus either on humans, states, or
This essay will describe the characteristics of the modern nation-state, explain how the United States fits the criteria of and functions as a modern nation-state, discuss the European Union as a transnational entity, analyze how nation-states and transnational entities engage on foreign policy to achieve their interests, and the consequences of this interaction for international politics.
Suppose you have landed a diplomatic job after completion of your MA International Relations (IR) but your syllabus didn’t include any class on diplomacy and besides you don’t have much time to set aside for reading on widening concept of diplomacy. Then the book ‘Diplomacy: Theory and Practice’ is the right choice for you to read. It explains the nuts and bolts of diplomacy in a clear way.
Melvyn, Leffler, (1986), “Adherence to Agreements: Yalta and the Experiences of the Early Cold War”, in International Security, No.9
Interaction among the people or groups of different parts of the world kept continued in ancient, medieval period till now. But the formal establishment of international relations begins from ‘Peace of Wesphalia’ in 1648, This point of time international relations started based on sovereign states, a milestone in development of modern states. Prior to ‘Peace of Westphalia’, international relations were based on a vague hierarchy of religious order. Peace of Westphalia was done after a thirty years of bloodbath among European powers. Peace of Westphalia is known as one the best example in world history which shows the significance of international relations in establishing peace and communal harmony. After this treaty international relations became based on peaceful diplomatic procedure of resolving the issues and to establish the peace and communal harmony among and within the nations. Establishment of international organizations e.g. UNO, are the results of peaceful diplomatic procedure of international
Whenever world politics is mentioned, the state that appears to be at the apex of affairs is the United States of America, although some will argue that it isn’t. It is paramount we know that the international system is shaped by certain defining events that has lead to some significant changes, particularly those connected with different chapters of violence. Certainly, the world wars of the twentieth century and the more recent war on terror must be included as defining moments. The warning of brute force on a potentially large scale also highlights the vigorousness of the cold war period, which dominated world politics within an interval of four decades. The practice of international relations (IR) was introduced out of a need to discuss the causes of war and the different conditions for calm in the wake of the first world war, and it is relevant we know that this has remained a crucial focus ever since. However, violence is not the only factor capable of causing interruption in the international system. Economic elements also have a remarkable impact. The great depression that happened in the 1920s, and the global financial crises of the contemporary period can be used as examples. Another concurrent problem concerns the environment, with the human climate being one among different number of important concerns for the continuing future of humankind and the planet in general.
How does identity –ethnic, religious, political, etc.- affect people’s view and actions related to foreign policy and international relations?