Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative methods
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative methods
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative methods
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative methods
Annotated Bibliography
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (Introducing Qualitative Methods Series). Pine Forge Press
The book “Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (Introducing Qualitative Methods Series” by Charmaz focuses on explaining to the reader how to use grounded theory. According to the author grounded theory is a very influential way to work with qualitative data. The book has numerous vivid illustrations that make it lively. The author also carefully argued her thoughts to make it a useful and essential reading. The author is a leading exponent of the grounded theory. She provides a clear guide to a new person in this field and uses worked examples to enhance the understanding. I found this book to be one of the best on the topic of grounded theory and social enquiry.
…show more content…
G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction publishers.
The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research is a book by Strauss and Glaser that seeks to address how theory from data is discovered, systematically obtained, analyzed in social research and how it can furthered. According to the book, grounded theory is the discovery of theory from data. They argue that this is a major task that confronts sociology. They also stated that this provided relevant explanations prediction interpretation and application. I found this book useful in the explanation of grounded theory. The book aims at improving the capacity to generate theory relevant to social research. This book is useful for anyone who study’s social phenomena especially when the study focuses on qualitative
Among all the available approaches to qualitative research the grounded theory is one of the most unique methodologies,
The author could have employed other methods of qualitative research such as, narrative analysis, grounded theory, discourse analysis, data display and analysis, content analysis and quantifying qualitative data and computer assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAPDAS) (Saunders et al., 2016). Nevertheless, these approaches seem cumbersome sometimes and take a long time to complete (Willig, 1999; Braun and Clarke, 2006 and Smith and Bekker,
The authors adopted the interpretive qualitative methods – ‘entering the research participants’ worlds’ (Charmaz, 2014) (p. 33) to learn about their perspectives. However, the researchers didn’t attempt to critically examine their own role/relationship, thus leaving potential bias and influence unchecked. In the qualitative research method, the researchers’ personal beliefs and values may distort the result (Holloway and Wheeler, 2013), therefore, it is best to clarify this in the report (Lockwood, Munn & Porritt, 2015).
Qualitative research seeks to understand a social or human problem through an inquiry process. It is conducted in a natural setting and reports the views of informants in rich detail. Qualitative research strives to describe the extraordinarily complex nature of people and their perceptions of their experience in the specific social context in which the experience occurs. (Geertz, 1973). This is quite different than the paradigm of quantitative research. The raw material for qualitative research is ordinary language, as opposed to the numbers that are the raw material for quantitative research. The language may be obtained in many ways. It may be the participant’s own descriptions of him or he...
Grounded Theory (GT) and Content Analysis (CA) are widely known methodologies applied within multiple scientific communities, sharing a close background with social sciences. Each of these approaches has been developed and tested throughout distinct historical pathways, both shaped by different aims, results and theoretical constructions. Whereas GT belongs to what could be described as “inductive science”, CA is tagged under the motto of “deductive sciences”, assuming essentially different epistemological positions (Bernard & Ryan, 2009). They are also contrasted by their qualitative and quantitative data insights. Content Analysis is generally described as a process where data are “quantified”, in which key words and phrases are commonly interpreted into statistical terms, associated as a quantitative focus (Weber, 1990). Grounded Theory on the other side, remains as a predominantly qualitative analysis throughout the overall process. But the reason why I put these differences side by side is to ask simple yet complex questions: Are these distinctions enough to be talking about strictly different approaches? And do these differences mean that both methodologies are essentially incompatible and aim to separate prospects?
Marshall, C, Rossman, Gretchen B, (2006). Designing qualitative research, 4th edition, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
A core phenomenon in a substantive study has clear implications for a formal grounded theory (Strauss 1987).
The sociocultural theory was developed by a theorist named Lev Vygotsky. Vygotsky was born in 1896 and was from the former Soviet Union. He was a psychologist who had an abundance of ideas and put them into many theories and writings. Although Vygotsky died from tuberculosis at the young age of thirty-eight, his most prominent work was done in a short period of ten years. When he died in 1934, the Soviet Union held most of his work and it was not until about 1960 that his work was translated into English. Currently in the education field, Vygotsky’s main work on the sociocultural theory is getting a lot of attention.
Grounded Theory (GT) is an established research approach used for generating theories, and it has been applied based on empirical data in many fields. However, Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (1967) initiate to using this approach in sociological theorizing based on qualitative inquiry. Since then, Grounded Theory (GT) approach appears as a powerful (ke, J. and Wenglensky, S., 2010) as well as a very popular (Birks, M., and Mills, J., 2015; El Hussein, M., Hirst, S., Salyers, V., and Osuji, J., 2014) qualitative research approach for developing theory grounded in qualitative data. It is popular because GT offers researchers the luxury of maintaining an open mind (Birks, M., and Mills, J., 2015) and allowing the data to generating a theory. In this process, the emergent findings appear representative of natural phenomena, and the evolving theories are free from any preconceived pattern explicated from the literature.
The Pluralist Theory The pluralist theories on media differentiate greatly from that of the Marxist in it arguments and opinions. Many pluralist sociologists such as Katz and Lazarsfield as well as pluralist authors e.g. Nicholas Jones a correspondent on BBC radio news help argue the pluralist case illustrated by the writings and actions. Pluralism acquires a diverse perspective on the involvements of the media seeing it as offering a wide selection of views of the various groups in society. They state modern society is democratic and people have autonomy allowing choice in whether or not to purchase or watch medial output.
Bailey, L. F. (2014). The origin and success of qualitative research. International Journal Of Market Research, 56 (2), 167-184. doi:10.2501/IJMR-2014-013
This research writing was used to describe how couples who use self-identity as being part of a healthy relationship (Young and Kleist 2010). The main purpose of this research is to better the understanding of couple’s relationship through qualitative study and to develop an initial grounded theory of self-identified healthy couples. Qualitative theory is a way to help support the research, and it can be used by using grounded theory. Grounded theory is the process that attempts to reveal process as part of a phenomenon and develop a theory of the experience of participants (Young and Kleist 2010). For the research Young focused on understanding the actual experience of healthy couple’s relationships and the process it took to be healthy.
Last Monday, June 27, 2016, we watched the movie “The Core” for us to get more knowledge about our planet Earth. The Core is a science fiction disaster film. The world encountered a calamitous dilemma because the Earth's molten core, which generates this field, has stop rotating and loses its electromagnetic field. The Earth becomes helpless and tremendous disasters appear all over the world. Birds lost their capability to navigate and it happened in London as far as I remember, direct rays from the sun, electrical super storm and many more took place when the Earth's core stopped spinning.
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine.
Qualitative research emphasizes the qualities of entities. It stresses the social constructed nature of reality. It helps develop an intimate relationship between the research and what is being studied. The situational constraints of qualitative research help shape inquiry.