Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative methods
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative methods
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative methods
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative methods
Annotated Bibliography
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (Introducing Qualitative Methods Series). Pine Forge Press
The book “Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (Introducing Qualitative Methods Series” by Charmaz focuses on explaining to the reader how to use grounded theory. According to the author grounded theory is a very influential way to work with qualitative data. The book has numerous vivid illustrations that make it lively. The author also carefully argued her thoughts to make it a useful and essential reading. The author is a leading exponent of the grounded theory. She provides a clear guide to a new person in this field and uses worked examples to enhance the understanding. I found this book to be one of the best on the topic of grounded theory and social enquiry.
…show more content…
G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction publishers.
The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research is a book by Strauss and Glaser that seeks to address how theory from data is discovered, systematically obtained, analyzed in social research and how it can furthered. According to the book, grounded theory is the discovery of theory from data. They argue that this is a major task that confronts sociology. They also stated that this provided relevant explanations prediction interpretation and application. I found this book useful in the explanation of grounded theory. The book aims at improving the capacity to generate theory relevant to social research. This book is useful for anyone who study’s social phenomena especially when the study focuses on qualitative
The author could have employed other methods of qualitative research such as, narrative analysis, grounded theory, discourse analysis, data display and analysis, content analysis and quantifying qualitative data and computer assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAPDAS) (Saunders et al., 2016). Nevertheless, these approaches seem cumbersome sometimes and take a long time to complete (Willig, 1999; Braun and Clarke, 2006 and Smith and Bekker,
Using two theoretical approaches to social research namely, Positivism and Standpoint theory, I have demonstrated implicit connections in their respective assumptions. The ontological, epistemological and methodical assumptions are all integral facets of the understanding of social research. Once these are understood one can then draw conclusions as to which type or types of methods are appropriate to use.
Qualitative research is an approach that attempts to situate an activity that locates the observer in the world by providing the study to occur in their natural setting and by attempting to make sense of, or interpret information (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005). A characteristic of qualitative research is to use a variety of empirical materials such as personal experience, interviews, and questionnaires. It is imperative to understand the task at hand and how to fully carry out the study when using a qualitative research approach in order to find out the information needed. One view of qualitative research is it involves examining individual’s experiences and documenting those experiences in detail (Jones, 2011). By documenting these observations the researcher is ensuring validity in his or her data and giving the correct creditability to those who participated in the study.
The authors adopted the interpretive qualitative methods – ‘entering the research participants’ worlds’ (Charmaz, 2014) (p. 33) to learn about their perspectives. However, the researchers didn’t attempt to critically examine their own role/relationship, thus leaving potential bias and influence unchecked. In the qualitative research method, the researchers’ personal beliefs and values may distort the result (Holloway and Wheeler, 2013), therefore, it is best to clarify this in the report (Lockwood, Munn & Porritt, 2015).
The research is guided by a theoretical framework called the Grounded Theory Approach. The Grounded Theory Approach (GT), first described by Glaser and Strauss in 1967, is an inductively formatted, general method of research that is aimed towards theory development through the data collection process and constant comparative analysis of that data. Cohen and Crabtree, 2006). The concept relies contingently upon the data the study presents and is characterized by the proposed theory being perfectly depicted by the data accumulated. Cohen and Crabtree, 2006).
This research writing was used to describe how couples who use self-identity as being part of a healthy relationship (Young and Kleist 2010). The main purpose of this research is to better the understanding of couple’s relationship through qualitative study and to develop an initial grounded theory of self-identified healthy couples. Qualitative theory is a way to help support the research, and it can be used by using grounded theory. Grounded theory is the process that attempts to reveal process as part of a phenomenon and develop a theory of the experience of participants (Young and Kleist 2010). For the research Young focused on understanding the actual experience of healthy couple’s relationships and the process it took to be healthy.
Marshall, C, Rossman, Gretchen B, (2006). Designing qualitative research, 4th edition, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Last Monday, June 27, 2016, we watched the movie “The Core” for us to get more knowledge about our planet Earth. The Core is a science fiction disaster film. The world encountered a calamitous dilemma because the Earth's molten core, which generates this field, has stop rotating and loses its electromagnetic field. The Earth becomes helpless and tremendous disasters appear all over the world. Birds lost their capability to navigate and it happened in London as far as I remember, direct rays from the sun, electrical super storm and many more took place when the Earth's core stopped spinning.
Grounded Theory (GT) and Content Analysis (CA) are widely known methodologies applied within multiple scientific communities, sharing a close background with social sciences. Each of these approaches has been developed and tested throughout distinct historical pathways, both shaped by different aims, results and theoretical constructions. Whereas GT belongs to what could be described as “inductive science”, CA is tagged under the motto of “deductive sciences”, assuming essentially different epistemological positions (Bernard & Ryan, 2009). They are also contrasted by their qualitative and quantitative data insights. Content Analysis is generally described as a process where data are “quantified”, in which key words and phrases are commonly interpreted into statistical terms, associated as a quantitative focus (Weber, 1990). Grounded Theory on the other side, remains as a predominantly qualitative analysis throughout the overall process. But the reason why I put these differences side by side is to ask simple yet complex questions: Are these distinctions enough to be talking about strictly different approaches? And do these differences mean that both methodologies are essentially incompatible and aim to separate prospects?
Grounded Theory (GT) is an established research approach used for generating theories, and it has been applied based on empirical data in many fields. However, Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (1967) initiate to using this approach in sociological theorizing based on qualitative inquiry. Since then, Grounded Theory (GT) approach appears as a powerful (ke, J. and Wenglensky, S., 2010) as well as a very popular (Birks, M., and Mills, J., 2015; El Hussein, M., Hirst, S., Salyers, V., and Osuji, J., 2014) qualitative research approach for developing theory grounded in qualitative data. It is popular because GT offers researchers the luxury of maintaining an open mind (Birks, M., and Mills, J., 2015) and allowing the data to generating a theory. In this process, the emergent findings appear representative of natural phenomena, and the evolving theories are free from any preconceived pattern explicated from the literature.
The Pluralist Theory The pluralist theories on media differentiate greatly from that of the Marxist in it arguments and opinions. Many pluralist sociologists such as Katz and Lazarsfield as well as pluralist authors e.g. Nicholas Jones a correspondent on BBC radio news help argue the pluralist case illustrated by the writings and actions. Pluralism acquires a diverse perspective on the involvements of the media seeing it as offering a wide selection of views of the various groups in society. They state modern society is democratic and people have autonomy allowing choice in whether or not to purchase or watch medial output.
Qualitative research emphasizes the qualities of entities. It stresses the social constructed nature of reality. It helps develop an intimate relationship between the research and what is being studied. The situational constraints of qualitative research help shape inquiry.
The sociocultural theory was developed by a theorist named Lev Vygotsky. Vygotsky was born in 1896 and was from the former Soviet Union. He was a psychologist who had an abundance of ideas and put them into many theories and writings. Although Vygotsky died from tuberculosis at the young age of thirty-eight, his most prominent work was done in a short period of ten years. When he died in 1934, the Soviet Union held most of his work and it was not until about 1960 that his work was translated into English. Currently in the education field, Vygotsky’s main work on the sociocultural theory is getting a lot of attention.
Bailey, L. F. (2014). The origin and success of qualitative research. International Journal Of Market Research, 56 (2), 167-184. doi:10.2501/IJMR-2014-013
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine.