Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Writing takes perseverance essay
Writing takes perseverance essay
Writing takes perseverance essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Writing takes perseverance essay
What Anne Lamott is trying to convey in this excerpt is that every writer writes a bad first draft. No one can sit down and write the best novel, essay, etc. The objective of this passage is trying to convince people that it’s okay to not know exactly what you’re going to write, or everyone really does write first “shitty drafts”. People who write for a living don’t feel one hundred percent about their writing. They don’t sit down every day and know exactly what they are going to do. There is a process to their madness and having a bad first draft is going to be one of them. Lamott discusses that her own writing has terrible first drafts and sometimes looks nothing like the finish product. She talks about how she wrote a food review for a newspaper. She started off writing the meat of the review. She then went back and wrote down even more and more until she was finished. This is her way to persuade the readers. Basically, Lamott is trying to go against popular belief about writers and that they don’t have first drafts and know exactly what they are going to write. I do believe what she is saying. It is impossible to just sit down and write …show more content…
a perfect first and final draft. This is good advice to people who are first starting out writing and even reminding other writers that it's okay to feel like this with your first draft. I believe that Lamott did a great job to convey the readers that no one is perfect and that everyone is going to have a bad first draft, second draft, and even a bad third draft. Don Murray is trying to convey in his text that everything we write comes from us.
This means that even if we are writing a fiction novel, newspaper article, college essay; everything comes from our childhood and our memories and has emotion involved. In high school we learned that we just have to write and it comes from doing research and rarely from our own ideas. Murray is also saying that when we read another person’s writing we can not disembody ourselves. This means that when we read or write we will always have a human emotion or reaction. I do believe that Murray is correct. We can’t do anything basically without it. Every single thing that we do will have some sort of human reaction or emotion connected to it. I will also be aware of other people’s writing and how they write from their past and their own
emotions. It is fairly obvious to me why Professor Kimbrell assigned these two readings. These readings help students like me ease into a writing class. I feel a little more comfortable starting to write because not everyone is perfect. Everyone will have “shitty first drafts.” I won’t be able to sit down all at once and write a perfect paper. No one can. Knowing that makes things a little more easier. Also, knowing where my writing comes from is helpful. I am not as self conscious about how I write because it’s me. Can my writing be better? You better believe it. It helps knowing why I write that way I do is going to be the first steps into fixing my writing.
“Once people actually write to others, they do things to them, they act on them. Perhaps you have not thought of your own writing as doing something, as acting on readers” (Schmidt and Kopple). She states another time when she says, “I know some very great writers, writers you love who write beautifully and have made a great deal of money, not one them sits down routinely feeling widely enthusiastic and confident. Not one of them writes elegant first drafts” (Lamott). This is yet another example of Lamott going back to the subject that first drafts are supposed to be bad. There is one example of bad rhetoric and it is when she says, “Not one of them writes elegant drafts. All right, one of them does, but we do not like her very much. We do not think that she has a rich inner life or that God likes her or can even stand her.” At first she says that everyone writes bad first drafts and then she brings up how one person doesn’t need to, she went against what she just said and that might cause confusion for the reader. Lamott would tell this purpose to this audience because she wants them to improve in their writing. Anne Lamott wants to achieve the success of helping everyone excel in his or her writing. She wants to inform writers that all first drafts should be bad. She does not want them to feel down on themselves, and to continue writing. This purpose is important because this
In her article “Shitty First Drafts,” Anne Lamott creates an argument attempting to prove to her readers that every good writer begins with a “shitty” first draft. This is a very bold claim to make about writers, and obviously should have some solid evidence to back it up. However, contrary to what one might think, Lamott has little to no “real” evidence to support her statements. Instead, she uses humor and sarcasm to cover the fact that she has no real support for her views. By doing this, Lamott lacks much of the credibility (usually) needed in a rhetorical argument, and her humorous tone does not suffice for a convincing argument. Even though Lamott incorporates a great deal of sarcasm and absurdity in her work, she lacks the most important
The way it is written is so vivid and it gets her point across so much more effectively than simply stating the fact. Lamott writes “Metaphors are a great language tool, because they explain the unknown in terms of the known(77).” Her statement reigns true to much of her writing in this book. She uses metaphors to explain the feelings that writers have to those of us who are not writers. Her metaphors often times refer to a part of her childhood that clue the reader into who she is. The book contains an entire chapter entitled “School Lunches” and she really does talk about school lunches for the entirety of the chapter. This chapter that could have been rather boring, was one of my favorites. Lamott relates the pressures and anxieties of school lunches with the pressures and anxieties of being a writer. “Here is the main thing I know about public school lunches: it only looked like a bunch of kids eating lunch. It was really about opening our insides in front of everyone. Just like writing is (34).” She goes on to list the “Do’s and Don’ts” of elementary school lunches and almost each one of them brought back that memory of perfecting my lunch box in elementary school and it creates a broader understanding of what it is like to be a writer. The metaphors that Lamott uses are perfect for the scenario and they are what turned a book about how to write into a humorous, and almost philosophical
In the article “Shitty First Drafts,” By Anne Lamott, she lets out the long held secret to good writing, there is never a good first run on a paper. It 's always starts off as a torrent of ideas unfiltered, ideas completely let loose. It is the draft that is never shown to anyone, the draft that holds all the dirty little thought that you have on a topic, and all the information that you may use later on. It does not matter if the draft is ten pages long filled with unreadable text in the end the good stuff you use could only fill up three pages.
Both Frahm and Lamott stress the importance to not worry about anyone but yourself when you are writing. The writer is always justified in following their own writing path because it is their work of art. The reader, of course, needs to be considered while writing through proper organization of ideas and flow in the writing piece, but the thoughts and ideas of the writer should be taken in consideration first. Lamott explains that it you need to silence the inner critic, “put the lid on, and watch all these mouse people clawing at the glass, jabbering away, trying to make you feel crummy” (Lamott 264). Simply ignore everyone else’s opinions, stick true to yourself, and focus on you and your draft to get the best possible outcome.
In the essay “Getting Started” by Anne Lamott. The author reaches out to her students and other fellow writers who struggle to overcome the infamous writer’s block. Thought out her paper she gives us hints and tips to train and prep us for our future papers. Her tips range from training you mind to prepare for a long and often strenuous essay, learning to take information in slowly to not overwork your brain and the last one always tell the truth in your essay. She threads through her essay that writing may be hard and seems like there is no silver lining but it’s not impossible to do. When done reading this essay I widely agree with Lamott’s writing ideas and tips they can be helpful for many struggling students. As one myself I found
This article “Shitty First Drafts” by Anne Lamott help me understand that every good writer struggle to write their first draft and it might not be perfect at first but with a lot of dedication and effort everything could be done as expected. know that even the best published book started out with “Shitty First Drafts” help me to not be too critical to my first draft and having a little bit more confidences about my writing. I would apply this lesson whenever I have a writing assignment and I am get frustrated on how to start my essay, I would remember that all writers went through this stage of anxiety and not comfortable about their first draft. I would definitely recommend this article to a student that is starting their first composition
Towards the end of the poem, Burns wants to know what the woman would do if she could leave her body and see what she looked like with the louse on her. Going deeper into the poem, Burns asks what it would be like if we could all see ourselves like society sees us. He says, “To see ourselves as others see us!” (line 44). Burns is wondering this because we see ourselves a certain way, but that may not be the same as how others see us. The message to us is that we should try an live one life only. We shouldn’t change ourselves when we are in society and completely change our personality when we are alone. Both ourselves and society should see us as one person.
In his view, "there is no such thing as a single mind, unconnected to other minds or to their (collective) social cultural constructions" (Cunningham, "MOM" handout). If this is taken as fact, the "social, cultural, historical, and institutional contexts" humans find themselves in contribute to creating their metaphors and in turn, their artifactual worlds. Therefore, the situational context and the metaphors found there are intertwined and must be examined together. For example, I work in a juvenile prison. Prison is an interesting cultural context to investigate from its various perspectives.
Christopher Boone, the protagonist of this novel, has encountered a lot of hardships dealing with people because of his mental disability. One of his biggest problems he faces is his incompetence to decipher between emotions. In order to make out the more complicated emotions, Christopher “...got Siobhan to draw lots of these faces and then write down next to them exactly what they meant.” He keeps this piece of paper in his pocket and uses it as reference when he has difficulty understanding other people’s emotions. “I like dogs” says Christopher, you always know what a dog is thinking. It has four moods. Happy, sad, cross and concentrating.” (5.2) He also finds it difficult to follow instructions. Since he is a very logical person he needs the directions to be precise and specific. “And this is because when people tell you what to do it is usually confusing and does not make sense.For example, people often say ‘B...
Abercrombie states that the human brain plays an active role in shaping the information presented to us, based on one’s past experiences. Kahneman claims that the human mind uses two systems of thinking, System 1 and System 2, where System 2 is more active and effortful than System 1. I attempt to illustrate how Abercrombie and Kahneman's ideal concepts of the perception of reality are applicable to real situations, by referring to the following three readings: Jung’s “The Personal and the Collective Unconscious,” Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” and Andersen’s “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” The three readings relate to Abercrombie and Kahneman, considering the overlapping concepts of reality, that words and metaphors structure our understanding of what is real, reality can be altered from different perspectives, and that ignorance can actually be bliss.
One aspect of my writing process is my “one and done” mentality. Meaning I only do one simple draft of my essay based on the outline I made and turn it in. Most of this has to do with the pride I have in my work and the fact that I don 't like to think that I have made any mistakes. Another factor in this is my being too lazy to conceive another draft out of my first. Anne Lamott’s entertaining Shitty First Drafts stated that even the most accomplished and established of writers’ first drafts are not perfect and ready to be published, so consequently my first drafts definitely should not be. I loved the way she mentioned that you have to do a shitty first draft to get a good second draft and a good second draft to get a terrific third draft.
I am sitting in my bed, thinking about my process of writing as I am trying to go through it. It seems the more I think about it, the less I understand it. When I am writing, I don’t think. Which I know, sounds bad. But, I spend every single moment of every single day over thinking, over analyzing, and over assuming every aspect of my life. When I’m writing, I’m free from that for just a little bit. Until of course, my hands stop typing or the pencil (no pens- never pens) stops moving, then I’m right back on the carousel that is my brain. Heidi Estrem says, “...writers use writing to generate knowledge that they didn’t have before.” (Writing is a Knowledge-Making Activity 18). I believe my ability to write without an exact destination
Recently in class, we read an article called Full Catastrophe Living by Jon Kabat-Zinn. In the article, Albert Einstein wrote a passage about explaining painful human experiences. When I first read the passage, my interpretation of Einstein's passage was that I believed that Einstein meant that he believes that our thoughts and emotions are the reasons that separate us from each other. I believed that our own personal emotions and thoughts is not allowing an individual's being able to be ourselves and being able to be who we are with others. Us, as individuals need to be able to see our inner beauty within each other and self without being blind by our own personal emotions. As an individual, we are so focused on our own thoughts and emotions from stopping us from doing what we want to do in life. Our emotions will always make a person think twice when a situation is approaching. We need to be able to see the beauty within ourselves and throughout the world.
When writing essays, I have noticed a pattern in where I always want to write about soccer. Since, soccer is a big part of life, I find it easier to talk about. There are two issues that can evolve when I keep writing about the same topic in my essays. Firstly, I wouldn’t be learning or exploring new topics or ways of thinking. Secondly, it will get boring for my professor to constantly keep reading the same essays that I write with different examples. Hence, in my second essay, Mary Louise Pratt, Arts of the contact zone, I decided to talk about Facebook how there are many different aspects that make it a contact zone. It allowed me to dig in deeper to the little details that make Facebook a contact zone. I began to have a different perspective