All over the world, testing on animals for research purposes still continues. From testing for diseases or developing medicines, animals have been tested on. However, there has been a controversy, some people think all the testing animals go through is not worth it. No, animal testing should not be banned due to its very important role in society. They allow testing of products, allow simulation of what happens to humans, and allows advancements in technology.
First, animal testing allows for testing of products if they are safe and work how they should be. From drugs to vaccines and shampoo, these are just a meager amount products that has been tested on animals. Some may say that all the testing done on animals is done with little or no purpose. However, all the product testing on animals is for a good cause. For example, some vaccines for severe diseases like polio, rabies, malaria and more have been test on animals to make sure the vaccine works properly as it should. Furthermore, it helps the human and other species function better and allows people to live healthier lives. If animal testing were banned, the gathering of essential information used in products for preventing death and misery would slow down to a halt.
…show more content…
Although, some people may say that if they want solid results for progression in science, scientists should just test on humans and stop the abuse of testing on animals. Nonetheless, testing on certain animals contributes benefits for scientists. Take for example, rats and mice are about 95% of animals tested on. Since rats and mice have short lifespans, the testing done on animals “simulates” what would happen to humans but in a lesser time frame. Since most physiological and genetic systems are similar in between animals and human, it yields valuable information for
Each year, thousands of animals are euthanized thanks to animal testing. Several people may argue that scientist are putting the lives of animals in danger by testing on them, on the other hand, is animal lives valued over human lives? By showing emotion there may be some guilt for harming the lives of animals, although puzzling over the percentage of human lives stay saved from animal testing doing all the research worthwhile. Should animal testing be banned?
Putting aside the countless claims that animal experimentation is unethical and should be banned, it is incredibly necessary and useful for mankind. Experimenting on humans is inhumane and completely immoral, while animals that do not function in the same way humans do should be used in medical research and to test the safety of various products. If animal testing were illegal, how would worldly corporations determine the safety of products? Surely the valuable lives of human beings are not essential to risk, hence the reason that animal experimenting is necessary. In addition, medical research would be in great jeopardy if were animals were not permitted to be experimented on. Medical industries have already come so far in treating multiple ailments due to the tests performed on animals. Alas, it is safe to say that for the continued thriving of our society, forbidding animal experimentation would be detrimental.
Thirdly, animal testing is unnecessary and unreliable because animal organisms are not the same as human ones. Hence, if a certain cosmetic product is determined to be safe after an animal test is done it does not necessarily mean that it is safe for human use. Therefore, we cannot rely on animal testing and we cannot be always sure that a certain product is safe for human use. So, there are lots of animal lives wasted, but many human lives could also be lost if some drug or product cause harm or even death. This is a strong reason why animal testing should be banned in order to save animals and people
Animal testing has been used for developing and researching cures for medical conditions. For example, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for cancer, insulin treatment for diabetes, organ transplants and blood transfusions are just some of the important advances that have come from research on animals (“Animal Testing”). Consuming animals for research benefits in developing various treatments and also benefits in discovery better methods for cures. According to the article “Animal Testing”, it says that the underlying rationale for the use of animal testing is that living organisms provide interactive, dynamic systems that scientists can observe and manipulate in order to understand normal and pathological functioning as well as the effectiveness of medical interventions. It relies on the physiological and anatomical similarities between humans and other animals (MacClellan, Joel). Meaning that animals have the same body components and features as humans and is the best thing to research on to better understand the human development. Even though several argue that animal testing is harming the animals, one has to think back to all the benefits that has come from it. There may be a little remorse for endangering animal lives, but realizing how far medicine has come makes it worth the while.
Is animal testing really worth taking away animal’s valuable lives? No, I think it’s wrong, inhumane, and cruel. Animals have feelings like humans do and they should be treated with respect even though they are just animals.When animals are tested over time they live in cruel and harsh conditions. They are tied up and changed to their cages or devices they are being tested on. Almost all tests fail in humans and it is not worth sacrificing an animals life.Think about all the things animals have to go through all the harsh and cruel treatment.They are put in conditions where they are not allowed to eat or drink and move around. Is it really worth killing an animals for eyeliner that will never hit the market or for drugs that all fail in humans. So here are some of the reasons I think we should ban all animal testing.
Without animal testing, products would be based on theory. No one would want to use something, which may damage the eyes, be poisonous, cancerous, and cause birth defects. Animals used in testing are not from the endangered species list; many of the types of animals used are killed each year by rat or mouse traps, animal control, exterminators, and animal shelters. Animal testing reaps great benefits, such as finding effective drugs to combat disease, improve surgical procedures, and make products safer. When someone goes to the store and buys a product, or is prescribed medication, they don’t have to worry if the product is safe to use, nor should they.
Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. As a matter of fact, the California Biomedical Research Association states that all of the medical breakthroughs in the past 100 years came from animal research. Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for medical purposes. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, check the safety of products meant for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Without animal testing, scientists wouldn’t be as far as they are in medicine today.
The optimistic viewpoints for animal testing are that it assists researchers in finding drugs and treatments to advance health and medicine. It is a legal requirement in most countries for drugs and vaccines to be tested in animals to ensure safety. The world would be a different place if animal research for medical purposes were done away with hundreds of years ago. Today many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines, etc. Animal testing and research is considered very important for improving human health; in fact, the scientific community and some of the general public support animal research. There are also groups of individuals who are against animal testing for cosmetics but they defend animal testing for medicine and the development of new drugs for disease.
Should animal testing be banned? Now, animal testing is still a controversial subject, and the scientists are facing an increasing problem, with more and more people appealing to stop animal testing. The original purpose of animal testing was to invent drugs for human diseases. For example, Scutti (2013) states that 98 of Nobel Prizes awarded for Physiology or Medicine, 75 were directly dependent on research from animals. The four non-animal experiment prize winners also relied on the data, which were obtained from other animal research groups.
One drug, used to cure symptoms of arthritis, caused the death of more than sixty thousand people in the United States. This drug was pulled off the market in 2004 because animal testing led researchers to believe that that drug, Vioxx, was safe (New England Anti-Vivisection...). A simple arthritis drug killed thousands of people, but the blame does not fall to the animals; therefore, the blame is on the researchers and scientists who trusted the animals test results to predict beneficial outcomes for humans. This drug is only one of numerous cases where a drug has been recalled due to the fact that it causes harmful results that were not seen in animal experiments. An animal’s make-up is similar to that of humans, but nonetheless there are
Animal testing saves so many human lives by the simplest research that doesn’t harm animals but helps them also. Animal testing consist of new chemicals, pesticides, consumer products, drugs, medical devices, vaccines and many other products. Some americans refuse to donate enough organs to help save lives so testing animals finds way to help saves lives. Animal research has saved and improved millions of animals and people. Today’s medicine we got from animal testing. Without animal testing we wouldn’t have a better understanding of disease and the way the body works. Also it has contributed to many medical advances today. Everyone has probably benefited from vaccines and antibiotics to prevent and treat infections. Lately research are tackling
Testing on animals should not be enforced because animals have not done nothing to us humans. Since 1938 testing has been around and it all determines on what animal it is and what kind of testing they will go through. Animals are tested for a variety of things including cosmetics, human medication, and food products.
First of all, animal testing should be banned in order to protect the rights of animals. In other words, animals’ rights are infringed by experimenting on them. Animals and humans are similar in many ways. To begin with, they have similar levels of biological complexity. They both are aware that they exist and they both make conscious choices. Philosophy professor at North Carolina State University Tom Regan points out "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment." (F. B. Orlans) Experimentation on an animal ...
According to the article” Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing,” animals’ rights are violated when the sciences are doing the research and there are many similar ways between humans and animals, such as how they feel and behave. Even though animals cannot express their opinions, they still feel, think, and experience pain. When the sciences use animals to do the research, humans still need to respect them because of animals’ rights. Animals have their opinions they cannot explain and humans have a duty to protect animals’ rights. Animal testing should be banned because humans need to respect their minds.
I personally believe that animal testing should be banned. There are many alternatives to testing products that don’t require animals. Innocent animals should not be used as our ‘guinea pigs’. Many countries around the world have banned animal testing.