Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Harmful effects of chemicals in cosmetics
Impacts of Animal Testing on Some Cosmetics is Necessary to Ensure Human Safety
Animal testing effects on animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Harmful effects of chemicals in cosmetics
Testing on animals should not be enforced because animals have not done nothing to us humans. Since 1938 testing has been around and it all determines on what animal it is and what kind of testing they will go through. Animals are tested for a variety of things including cosmetics, human medication, and food products.
Cosmetic is a big product now in this generation and before the companies can sell it to the population they have to test it first. The reason why they test it is because they don’t want anyone to get bad chemical burns, rashes, and allergic reactions. Monkeys and dogs does not get tested on for cosmetics, only guinea pigs, rats, rabbits, and mice. They test for skin and eye irritation, they will shave a rabbit and put the chemical on the shaved part and they will put drops into their eyes, it will take about weeks and up to months before results come out. Testing have scientific limitations, different species respond differently when exposed to the same chemicals. Some of the test may not be relevant to humans, as they can under or overestimate real-world hazards to people. Cosmetics are not the only thing that get test on animals, human medication is another big test that animals have to go through.
…show more content…
Animal drug testing does not predict the effects on humans, if a medication is new they test it out on two different species before giving it to human volunteers.
Animals are the most expensive ways of conducting research, they are normally bred and kept unwanted infections. One million animals suffer from cosmetics each year, the AWA helps what they can and make sures the animals aren’t dying from these test. Rabbits, mice, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, and mice are used for cosmetic testing, these six animals are used for a lot of different testing. Human medication is harmful because of all the chemicals and will kill them at least food products aren’t has
bad. Animals that are testing food is not that bad, some foods aren’t harmful and the animals will just get a little chunky eating all that food. Such test involve oral, admin, nistration, and application to the skin and eyes. The majority of test are performed on rodents but also on guinea pigs, dogs, and rabbits. The food product testing is just to see what all allergies us humans can get and what kind of chemicals are in foods that humans should not be eating. Animals would be safe if the inmates would test these stuff for us and humans would not be as picky as they are. Animal testing is a harsh thing to happen, if inmates that did a very bad thing to end up in jail would be our test dummies, we wouldn’t have to use animals. How would you like it if they tested your beloved pet?
The use of animals to test cosmetics is introduced in their article as well. The authors quote a vast amount of credible sources from prestigious universities such as Princeton and from well known animal rights group such as PETA. I will use this as my main source of information.
In many parts of the world, animals are being used in laboratories are still suffering and dying to test cosmetics. In
Sadly according to the Humane Society International (HSI) article About Animal Testing “in the United states alone around 26 million animals are tested each year for medical and commercial research” (HSI) even though animal testing is not required to ensure that the cosmetic being sold are safe. From those 26 million animals being tested most are not protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act. The animal welfare act does not include birds, rats and mice bred for research, and it doesn’t include cold-blooded animals. Animals testing should be banned because the animals tested suffer immensely, also animal tested is unethical, and because there are many alternatives.
...ts on animals. China is also in the process of decreasing the amount of animal tested products in circulation as well (“Cosmetics and House-Hold Products Animal Testing”). Even though there are alternatives to using animals in this testing, companies in the United States still continue to torture animals for the sake of beauty. There are plenty more ways to experiment with products that do not involve animals in any way, and these tests also produce more reliable information. According to Earth Protect, Tests like this are often cheaper and produce faster results than animal research ever has. For example, there is a model of human cornea tissues that can be subject to eye irritation experiments instead of a rabbit, and there are models of skin cells that can be used for skin irritation tests instead of guinea pigs (“Cosmetic Animal Testing Facts and Alternatives”).
Today, millions of animals are being tested on for the use of human products, causing them to fall ill and die, leaving them no choice but to be experimented on. Animal abuse can be more than what meets the eye. Specifically, animal testing is a form of animal abuse and usually ends in death of a harmless animal. Some might say that there is no other way to test products, but due to the harm that is done and our advancements in science, animal testing should not be tolerated.
The Cruelty of Cosmetic Testing on Animals Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the need to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.
The very first reason why animal testing should be banned is elementary: it is cruel and unnecessary. Approximately 17-22 million animals are used for testing each year in the United States. Substances are injected into the animal, chemicals are force-fed, irritants are rubbed into the eyes and skin, and even testing of animal fetuses is involved. 50% of the animals die after 2-3 weeks of this testing, and the rest are left to suffer.
“Over 1 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in U.S. labs” according to DoSomething.org. And although these animals may be considered protected under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) they are still able to be tortured and mistreated in labs. On top of all this, there is absolutely no guarantee that results and data collected from these procedures are accurate. Our anatomic builds are similar in ways but not at all interchangeable. Even though it has saved lives, animal experimentation should be banned because it is not a guarantee that these procedures are done pain free and humans and animals react differently to the medicines and chemicals used.
Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.
Hundreds of millions of animals die every year from animal testing in the United States. Innocent animals are used everyday in laboratories for biology advancements, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. They are used to provide information to make better products that are safe for human use. Although animal experimentation has some benefits, the negatives outweigh the positives. Animal testing is killing off innocent beings for the possible human benefit, and with modern technology, there are alternative ways to test products that leave animals unharmed.
It is now required by law that cosmetics are tested for safety before being made available to the public. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is in charge of overseeing drug and cosmetic testing today. Animal testing was the most widespread form of cosmetic testing considered proven, but the technology that is now available may replace the need for animal test...
Believe it or not, testing on animals for cosmetics continue regardless of the non-animal tests available. Instead of the Draize test, which measures how long it takes for a substance to burn away a rabbit’s eye, producers of the product can now drop that substance into cornea-like tissue configurations produced from human cells. Therefore, making the testing results more accurate and beneficial for human use. In addition, human skin can be grown and obtained for use in skin irritation testing of products. Many more experiments now in use are quicker and more precise at expecting human responses to a product animal tests ever were. Scientists say, “However, huge multiproduct manufacturers, such as Johnson & Johnson, driven by a fear of lawsuits (although animal tests have not proved effective in a company’s defense when a consumer sues) continue to poison, burn, and blind animals in tests” (Cosmetics and Household-Product Animal Testing,
According to The New England Anti-Vivisection Society (NEAVS), “Species differences in anatomy, organ structure and function...among myriad other differences...can give us inadequate or erroneous information when we attempt to apply animal data to...drug responses”. Although the animals being tested upon, are typically mammals, the genetic similarities are slim from animal to human. This leaves a large margin for error to occur during testing, so when human trials begin, it is typical for reactions to occur. The FDA reports that 92% of the products that pass through the animal testing stage onto human trials end up being deemed unsafe for consumers. Animal testing for American Taxpayers is an extreme waste of money. Private companies pay for the testing themselves, but drug companies that have financial aid from the government are wasting the taxpayer’s money. America is in desperate need of an updated method of testing cosmetics and
Animal testing has become extremely costly. Animal testing results are not quick, especially for cosmetics. When testing a product it needs to be continually applied to detect if it’s going to irritate the skin or eyes. This can take days or weeks. During this time you have to keep the animals alive long enough to see the result. Therefore also having to supply food and water costing even more $$$. For example the eye irritant test involving rabbits to see how a product or chemical will react on human eyes cost around 1,800$ while the alternative in vitro method only cost 1,400$. Not only is the alternative more accurate but its much more cost effective and over time those 400$ will add up. Another common example is the skin sensation test, which is where a product is placed on a shaved animals skin to see how it reacts. The cost for the animal test is 6,000$ and the alternative is only 3,000$. That is a lot of money that could be used to make the product better or for the company to keep.
All over the world, testing on animals for research purposes still continues. From testing for diseases or developing medicines, animals have been tested on. However, there has been a controversy, some people think all the testing animals go through is not worth it. No, animal testing should not be banned due to its very important role in society. They allow testing of products, allow simulation of what happens to humans, and allows advancements in technology.