Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative effects on animal testing
Ethical dilemma on animal testing
Essay on alternatives to animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive and negative effects on animal testing
Animal Testing: Limits of Science
A limit of science is when science is being pushed to the absolute extreme, in order to pursue a better condition. However, sometimes scientists push these limits too far. An example of this is animal testing, animal testing is being used all over the world right now. Mice, rats, guinea pigs, fish, birds, rabbits, primates, cats, and dogs are the main sources of animals that are currently being tested. (ProCon.org, 4). Evidence suggests that animals are being put in cages and labs and are being brutally treated. Animal testing has a harmful impact to the environment due to the false ideas, cruel and inhumane punishment; and alternative methods available.
Many have false perceptions of what animal testing really is and does. Scientists are using our animals to test the safety of products such as drugs, cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, and pharmaceuticals, but are not keeping these creatures safe while doing this (Humane, 1). It is not a simple blood test that is then taken into the lab and studied, it is a much more lengthy and gruesome process. This type of treatment to the animals does not put them in the right condition to be used for scientific data. There are few people who actually know how harmful animal testing is. Animals suffer just like humans do, just because
…show more content…
Imagine you, your friends, and your family being forced to live in a cage for your whole life, being poked with needles, burned, and poisoned. They have oozing boils and bare fur spots from where they get poked by needles. Malnourished and hungry, then the other half of them die and are killed for dissection. There is video footage to prove how terribly these animals are treated. With the added stress these animals are put under, the test will not even be accurate at this point. They do not get fed well or treated right, so who is to say the data collected is correct and
The information that animals have provided scientists over the past decades has changed society, and is still changing society for the better. Millions of lives have been saved with the use of animal testing and many more will be saved with continued research. However, there are many who dismiss this monumental achievement completely and oppose the use of animals in laboratory research. Though many find this practice to be
Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments, all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings. While animal testing has led to many life-saving cures, animal testing is cruel and inhumane because it involves inflicting pain and harm on the test subject to study its effects and remedies. Testing involves physically restraining, force-feeding, and depriving animals of food and water.
At the turn of the new century, activists begun to protest the morality of animal experimentation: “… such methodology is far too cruel on beast, it cannot better mankind, but its lead to it demise…” Despite the rising concern for animal safety in laboratory research, federal legislations approved the practice. According to the federal bureaucrats, it is an essential tool to improve our current medical knowledge. Hence, most of the tested animals have a relatively shorter life span than human. Thus, it allows to test long-term disease in a smaller timeframe. Nonetheless, animal enthusiast request the banishment of animal experimentation in laboratory. Ergo, with our current technology, researchers are capable to reproduce the same result
Animal testing has been used for developing and researching cures for medical conditions. For example, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for cancer, insulin treatment for diabetes, organ transplants and blood transfusions are just some of the important advances that have come from research on animals (“Animal Testing”). Consuming animals for research benefits in developing various treatments and also benefits in discovery better methods for cures. According to the article “Animal Testing”, it says that the underlying rationale for the use of animal testing is that living organisms provide interactive, dynamic systems that scientists can observe and manipulate in order to understand normal and pathological functioning as well as the effectiveness of medical interventions. It relies on the physiological and anatomical similarities between humans and other animals (MacClellan, Joel). Meaning that animals have the same body components and features as humans and is the best thing to research on to better understand the human development. Even though several argue that animal testing is harming the animals, one has to think back to all the benefits that has come from it. There may be a little remorse for endangering animal lives, but realizing how far medicine has come makes it worth the while.
The ethics behind using animals for experiments and tests has been questioned and debated for years. Many people believe that animal experimentations can be crucial towards medical breakthroughs such as the cure for cancer, HIV/AIDS or asthma. Meanwhile others argue that animals that are used to test cosmetics such as make-up and perfumes are inhuman because is not going to help improve the human race. Animals suffer through multiple types of torture such as being forced to ingest poisonous chemicals, blinded, burned, stapled, and infected with disease viruses. Even though animal experimentation may be considered inhumane to many, animal experimentation is crucial to advancements in medical research and can lead to a better quality of life; on the other hand, animal experimentation should not be used to develop cosmetics because such experimentation is cruel and unnecessary.
Today, millions of animals are being tested for the use of human products, causing them to fall ill and die, leaving them no choice but to be experimented on. Animal abuse can be more than what meets the eye. Specifically, animal testing is a form of animal abuse and usually ends in the death of a harmless animal. Some might say that there is no other way to test products, but due to the harm that is done and our advancements in science, animal testing should not be tolerated. Our advancements in science have enabled us to create other things that we can test on, instead of harming innocent animals.
Every year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research. Some may believe that animal testing is a crucial part to medical research and should be used more frequently. Others believe the pain and suffering inflicted upon the animals is morally wrong and should not be done, no matter what benefits come from it.
Animal testing is cruel and inhuman, causing too many animals to be injured or killed when safer alternatives become available. Animal testing is very harmful and dangerous to the animals. The Humane Society International is aware of the experiments being done on the animals. The Society says, “animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and “killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck breaking, decapitation, or other means” (“Should Animals”). The Society explains in detail the experimentation used to ensure consumers know how badly the animals are being treated.
Testing on the animals is conducted inside universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, farms, defense establishments and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Some of the tests that researchers do on the animals are biomedical research, transplantation, drug testing and toxicology testing, cosmetics and other animal testing that are used for directional research, breeding and defense research. Organizations like PETA and BUVA think it is not a necessity for this testing. They think it is cruel, poor scientific practice, poorly regulated and that animals used for experimentation have an intrinsic right not to be used for experimentation. Many Americans don’t agree with testing on animals.
Animal Testing Right now, almost 26 million animals are locked inside cold, desolate cages in laboratories across the world. They are in tremendous amounts of pain longing to one day roam free again. Instead, they must sit and wait in fear until they are used to a painful procedure. After being held captive all alone in a cage, almost all of them will die. They are deprived of food, water, and sleep.
Also, the animals often undergo extreme pain and suffering, like breaking an arm or leg, as researchers inflict pain on them to test remedies, often times ending in lost lives. Correspondingly, many animals in the United States are subjected to this torture: “More than 100 million animals suffer and die in the U.S. every year in cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests as well as in medical training exercises and curiosity-driven medical experiments at universities” (Peta n.pag.). The large number of animals in the United States dying per year is extensive and outstanding, considering most of the animals die due to the harsh chemicals or body experiments. The animal tests are done for a variety of experiments, but the amount of lost lives outweighs any of the benefits of these tests. 100 million animals dying per year from these serious tests shows how immense the issue is. Supporters of animal testing would argue that the safety of humans is more important than animals, so if the animals are dying, at least it is not humans. Although this may be true, according to ProCon.org, “The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings” (ProCon Researchers n.pag.). Testing on the animals proves to lack actual results that can help scientists to create a helpful product or drug because the anatomies of humans and animals are very different, and they react in different ways. Henceforth, testing on animals should not be
Imagine your sweet cat locked in a cage inside a laboratory with other various animals. Millions of animals every year are locked up in labs for testing. Animals are used to test medications, cosmetics, biology lessons, and for medical training. Thousands of mice, rats, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are used for testing. Most of these animals will die in cruel testing experiments. Animal testing is tortures to the animals, an unreliable option for medication, and there are better safer options for testing.
Animal testing is wrong in many ways. Right this second millions of rats, rabbits, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked in cold and morbid cages. Instead of roaming in the wild they sit in cages fearing the next pain...
People do not realize that humans and animals are not very similar. Putting the animals in an environment that is unknown to them causes them to be stressed out which can skew the results of the experiment. The website, Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons, says that animals and humans are not exactly the same. This website says that that the reaction of drugs in an animal’s body is quite different from the reaction in a humans body. Therefore making these tests unreliable. It also states that the animals are in an unnatural environment which would cause them stress, leading to the drug reacting differently. The website newspaper article Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing Expresses that the testing of products on animals is completely unnecessary because viable alternatives are available. The say that many cosmetic companies have sought better ways to test their products without the use of animal subjects. It also says that using synthetic material will turn opaque when a product damages it, closely resembling the way that a real eye reacts to harmful substances. Computer simulators also have been in an upright to decrease in the number of animal tests. They are used to estimate how much damage that product would cause human tissue and cells. Another website newspaper article states that all but very few diseases are specific-unique and the only efficient and effective
In psychology, animals have repeatedly been used through the history of brain research to gain insights into the functioning of the human brain as it controls the functioning of the human body. Processes such as movement, memory, communication, emotion, and perception and all linked to the human brain (De Castro & Olsson, 2015). It is for these reasons that scientists and researchers engaged in animal studies to gain knowledge and information that could be used to understand human behaviour and performance and potentially treat psychological and neurological disorders. This paper discusses the historical and contentious debates around animal brain research in psychology. It further critically analyses the limitations and inadequacies of early