Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stop animal testing
Consequences of animal experimentation
The dangers of animal experiments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stop animal testing
Tens of millions of animals are killed or maimed each year through research on the safety and effectiveness of new drugs, chemicals, and consumer products. Even though animals are not humans does not mean they should be used for testing, which is so inhumane. These animals could have a different importance in society than just experimentation. What is done to animals is usually not safe, ending up with the animal injured or even dead. This experimentation however, is becoming less useful because scientists are creating new ways for testing. Animal testing is cruel and inhuman, causing too many animals to be injured or killed when safer alternatives are becoming available. Animal testing is very harmful and dangerous for the animals. The Humane Society International is aware of the experiments being done to the animals. The Society says, “animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and “killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck breaking, decapitation, or other means” (“Should Animals”). The Society explains in detail the experimentation used to ensure consumers know how badly the animals are being treated. The animals used are also seldom given medication before procedures to reduce the pain. The US Department of Agriculture reported “in 2010, 97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief” (“Should Animals”). The animals given no anesthesia are being forced to suffer and experience pain in a way that no being should ever have to. Anim... ... middle of paper ... ... 2014. Moxley, Angela. The End of Animal Testing. Humane Society, 2010. Web. 22 Jan. 2014. Rowan, Andrew. “New Technologies Could Eliminate the Need for Animal Experimentation.” Animal Experimentation. Ed. Susan C. Hunnicutt. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. At Issue. Rpt. from “Avoiding Animal Testing: Advances in Cell-Culture Technologies are paving the Way to the Complete Elimination of Animal from the Laboratory.” The Scientist (Nov.-Dec. 2011). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 5 Feb. 2014. “Should Animals be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?” Procon.org. 20 Jan. 2014. Web. 22 Jan. 2014. Vakinin, Sam. “Whether a Right or Not, Animals Should be Treated Morally.” The Rights of Animals. Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Rpt. from “The Rights of Animals.” animalliberationfront.com. Web. 31 Jan. 2014.
Web. The Web. The Web. 13 Nov. 2013. Bartlett, Bruce.
The information that animals have provided scientists over the past decades has changed society, and is still changing society for the better. Millions of lives have been saved with the use of animal testing and many more will be saved with continued research. However, there are many who dismiss this monumental achievement completely and oppose the use of animals in laboratory research. Though many find this practice to be
Driscoll, Sally and Laura Finley. “Animal Experimentation: An Overview.”Points Of View: Animal Experimentation (2013): 1. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 6 Feb. 2014
According to the California Biomedical Research Association, almost every medical advancement in the last 100 years is a direct result of animal testing and research. The use of animals has become standard procedure in a wide range of testing and experimentation, including product toxicity testing, biomedical and veterinary experiments, drug development and testing, and education. Major advancements in treating and understanding chronic conditions such as cancer, cystic fibrosis, malaria, and tuberculosis, have been achieved due to animal research. Also, the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics are also direct results of the testing and observation of animals. On the other hand, many people believe that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. In many laboratories animals are subjected to force feeding, food and water deprivation, physical restraints, and infliction of pain. Because the animals cannot protect themselves, many people argue that exploiting animals to better the lives of humans is wrong and should not be permitted.
Each year animals are brought to animal testing labs where scientists preform experiments on them to see if a product is safe for a human or not. These animals patiently await the next procedure to be done on them because they have no other choice. These experiments can cause multiple side effects on animals that can be both painful and agonizing. These experiments can also last days which means that the innocent animals have to live in pain up until a scientist thinks that the experiment has gone on long enough. Also, animal experiments cannot always be trusted because they have different genetics than humans so
Web. The Web. The Web. 6 Nov. 2011. Forer, Ben.
Every year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research. Some may believe that animal testing is a crucial part to medical research and should be used more frequently. Others believe the pain and suffering inflicted upon the animals is morally wrong and should not be done, no matter what benefits come from it.
(Sub-Point # 1) According to The Humane Society International, animal testing is the process of using living animals for research purposes. Much of this research is done for common human use such as medicine, cosmetics, shampoos, cleaning products,pesticides, contact lenses, and diapers. Most of these research facilities will tell you that the pain the animals feel during testing is considered “mild”, but still have the potential to cause pain, suffering, and even death for the animals. Common procedures include forced exposures to chemicals which is done by injections. Animals are also inflicted pain with wounds so that either their healing or stress level can be studied. At the end animals are killed or are used in other experimentations. The number of animals that have been tested on should be reported, but 90% of the animals used in testing here in the United States are not represented on government statistics (Rowan,
Dangerous. Expensive. Unreliable. These are all facets of animal testing, which has been a widespread practice since the early 1900s. In experimental research from Professors Ari Joffre, Meredith Bara, Natalie Anton and Nathan Nobis, 84% of the public and 72% of medical school students responded in favor of alternative research methods over using animals (Joffre et al., 2016, 4). However, the study did not delve into whether people think it is more justified to experiment with some species over others. For example, most citizens would be stronger supporters of canine rights over those of mice. This essay will assert that testing on all types of animals is objectionable due to the pain that the subjects undergo, negative environmental and health
Web. The Web. The Web. 14 May 2014. Stanley, Jay.
More than 100 million animals worldwide are used for testing annually, and about a quarter of those animals die from being over tested. Animal testing is the use of animals for cosmetics, medical, biological, or psychological knowledge. Although gaining this knowledge is important, animals are put through pain, stress, and suffering in the process of experimentation. Animal Testing has been used for centuries, and as a result many animals are dying. If animals continue to be used for experimentation, then the amount of animals that are killed each year will continue to increase by the millions. By banning animal testing and finding new ways to test products, the animals that are killed each year will decrease.