Animal Testing Is Morally Wrong

522 Words2 Pages

Skylor Proctor English period-3 Animal testing is morally wrong. Hair products, makeup, body products, and medication are used regularly by billions of people every year, but do you know who tests the chemicals that are in the product to make sure they're safe for humans? Animals that’s who, thousands of animals are being tested everyday for two years. I think that Animal testing should be banned by society and the government, they should find another way to test chemicals, and that stopping animal testing on cosmetics is good business. The reason I think that Animal testing should be banned by society and the government because of the fact that it’s morally wrong. “Throughout the years many different people have tested on humans to satisfy their curiosity and gain scientific knowledge” (peta article),In later years, animal testing became a law in 1938 after a pharmaceutical company sold a drug containing diethylene glycol, which is poisonous to humans. This kind of drug killed over a hundred people. Dr. Elias Zerhouni states, “We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included… The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem. We need to refocus and adapt new methodologies for use in humans …show more content…

“While 80% of the world still allows animal testing for cosmetics, roughly half of the global cosmetic market is now firmly closed to animal tested cosmetics” (Engebretson article). Now with that being said, it shows that their business must of increased sale prices. “Modern non-animal testing methods have proven to be as good or better at predicting human responses than animal tests and, the new tests tend to produce results more quickly at a lower cost than the animal tests they replace”( Engebretson

Open Document