Should Animal Testing Be Banned

511 Words2 Pages

Certain countries are considering a ban on animal testing and experimentation. I disagree with this ban on animal testing. While it may seem that animal testing is cruel and unethical, it has helped both humans and animals in many ways. For example, many horrible diseases that have been cured have, at some point used animal testing. This and many other reasons is why there should not be a ban on animal testing.
Firstly, animal testing helps scientists learn how the human body works without actually experimenting on humans. The animals most commonly used in experiments are mice and rats. The California Biometrical Research Association says rats and mice are effective for experiments concerning humans due to the fact that, “mice share more than 98% DNA with humans…” This means that humans and mice share many similar problems and disabilities, making them a good organism to test. Many scientists do these tests to cure illnesses and to find answers that they could not determine in computer or cell and tissue tests.
Another reason why I disagree with this ban on animal testing is because computer tests and bacterial research cannot explain everything. As DR. Bella Williams of Understand …show more content…

This is partially true, if something of this caliber were to be done to humans it would be worse than death. On the contrary, animal research has provided humans with revolutionary results, and the California Biometrical Research Association states, “... after many years of research using rats, mice, and monkeys, polio vaccines were developed and used to to treat this disease.” This, along with breakthroughs in cancer, HIV/AIDS, asthma, antibiotics, organ transplants, and high blood pressure research, have all been done with the help of animal testing and experimentation. Also, other types of research is used, as few as possible animals are consumed, and technology has been refined to reduce

Open Document