Animal Farm Rhetorical Analysis

907 Words2 Pages

George Orwell's "Animal Farm" is a satirical allegory that critiques the corrupting influence of power and the use of propaganda in totalitarian regimes. Central to this critique is the character of Squealer, whose role as the pigs' propagandist is crucial in maintaining their control over the other animals. Through Squealer, Orwell illustrates the mechanisms of manipulation, the distortion of truth, and the betrayal of revolutionary ideals, ultimately conveying a pessimistic view of human nature and the cyclical nature of power. From the onset, Squealer is portrayed as an extraordinarily persuasive orator. The animals recognize his skill, saying, “The others said of Squealer that he could turn black into white.” This early description establishes Squealer's pivotal role in manipulating truth and swaying the opinions of the other animals. His rhetorical prowess is fundamental to the consolidation of the pigs' power, as he convinces the animals to accept the pigs' increasingly authoritarian decisions unquestioningly. Orwell uses Squealer to demonstrate how propaganda can be employed to control and manipulate the masses. …show more content…

He argues, “We pigs are brainworkers”. The whole management and organization of this farm depend on us.” By presenting the pigs' privileges as essential for the farm's success, Squealer begins the process of unequal resource distribution. This incident marks the beginning of the pigs' corruption and hypocrisy, reflecting Orwell's critique of how those in power often exploit their positions for personal

Open Document