Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of anger in leadership development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of anger in leadership development
Anger for survival Theme Essay Anger can be a motivator to somebody in a stressful situation, like in a job or in the military. Research has shown that anger can actually be used to motivate somebody to break through a problem or barrier, and angry people tend to be more optimistic. “I never work better than when I am inspired by anger; When I’m angry, I can write, pray and preach well, for then my whole temperament is quickened, my understanding sharpened, and all mundane vexations and temptations depart” (Martin Luther). In the mid to late 1970s, Cambodia fell under the rule of the Khmer Rouge, a communist group who tried to bring Cambodia back to a farming country. They banned religion, modern technology and education. Anybody …show more content…
Loung and her family are victims in the Cambodian genocide. Since her father is a government official, they must keep their past lives a secret. But the Angkar finds out about Pa’s past job, and he is executed. After the Angkar kill her father, she is only motivated by her lust for vengeance, as she desires to bring pain and suffering to them. She talks to her father even after he is dead, promising to avenge him, and the others who she knows and loves that were killed. “But, one day, they will all suffer as we are suffering now” she says in her mind. She wants revenge, she hopes that making them suffer will bring joy to her and her father. “Pa, I am going to kill them all” (Ung 119). Loung is motivated by her desire for justice, she lives for this idea where she will have joy again by killing them. She feels like killing them will bring a fulfillment to her life and her father in the afterlife. She feels that her vengeance will be a substitute for her father’s presence, and it somewhat is, as her father’s love kept her alive before he was executed. She thinks only of her vengeance, and this is what kept her so determined to live. Her rage is slowly influencing her in negative, uncontrollable …show more content…
As Vietnamese troops invade Cambodia, the child soldiers train to fight the invaders. As they are training to attack troops with knives, Loung focuses her anger on the dummy. “I attack at Met Bong’s cue, charging at the dummy, I yell ‘Die! Die!’ Though I focus on its head, I am only tall enough to thrust my knife into its stomach” (Ung 159). Her anger is now being used more as a driving force rather than just a cause for spontaneous outbursts. “It is dangerous to travel without permission, but I don’t care” (Ung 159). She goes on to see her mother, motivated and determined by her anger. But her mother and her baby sister, Geak, have been executed by the Angkar. Loung passes out for three days after learning about her mother’s fate, but she is woken by the superior of her camp and she is punished. The next day, she trains using her anger on the dummies, she imagines stabbing the leader of the Angkar, Pol Pot, over and over again. Loung’s anger only empowers her, and her want for
When he returned to the city in the 1970’s he was a much different person who had become the “master of his own opinions” 2. Liang was more upset he spent "most of the time is spent memorizing dogma" (269)3. Liang began to research in search of him, and through education was able to think outside of the Maoist thought. We see that Liang grew to be happy; he found companionship, freedom, Liang and his wife were finally able to get married due to China being able to view the west as more openly. The Son of Revolution reflects the bounds and paradox of the communist government, which quarantined many individuals regardless of the fact its main focus was on equality and the betterment of the community.
.... In the end, O-lan’s anger helped her stand up to Wang Lung. She grew more bold. In the end, when she died, Wang Lung wished that he had treated her better because he truly missed her presence.
She hates that she is getting a special treatment because of her age: "What I hate about being my age is how nice everyone tries to be. I was never nice, but now everybody is pelting me with sugar cubes." (p. 117). When she was young she was a social rebel, trying to change the world: " She had spent her life in the company of rebels and deviationists, and she recognized all their styles."
Loung and Chou are contrasting characters throughout the novel and contradict each other at every term. Loung is very rambunctious and and is not afraid to say what is on her mind. Since
Chang portrays the complexity of Henry’s character by showing the conflict that he faces both in his personal and professional life. His confusion towards his own Cultural identity is noticed in his relationships with his co-workers as well as with his family. His personal relationship with his family, especially with his father and his wife exemplifies the clash between the two cultures which seems to tear Henry apart. Leila, Henry’s wife, seems to epitomize the traditional American Culture which Henry tries very hard to be a part of. Her forthright nature along with the independence and individuality contradicts the stereotypical qualities of an Asian wife. However, Henry’s desperation is seen in his forgiving attitude towards Leila’s action and behavior. His deter...
Although Niang explicitly demonstrates her blatant favouritism towards her actual birth kids, shunning the likes of her stepchildren, some of her nasty traits cannot be avoided by even the most loved of her children. In this case, her violence and impatience. Little Sister, being only a baby and having not seen her actual mother Niang, was understandably uneasy when meeting her for the first time. Not even thinking of letting Little Sister adapt to her new environment, Niang’s impatience at her less than warm welcome from her favourite daughter led her to slap the poor child. She began “beating her daughter in earnest”, with her blows landing “indiscriminately on Little Sister’s ears, cheeks, neck and head”. Such brutality demonstrated by a mother to her daughter shows vividly how Niang couldn’t control her destructive nature, choosing instead to let her exasperation take over.
As seen in the Novel, most acts of anger and violence are down to failed dreams and hope, with the one or two exceptions and that they are both ways of letting how you feel known and a way to make you feel better.
It is this selfishness that makes it hard for the reader to be empathetic towards her later in the play, as it is evident in this scene that her hardships were brought on by herself. If she hadn’t insisted on the murder, she would not be driven insane by guilt, which would eventually lead to her death.... ... middle of paper ... ... As we saw, it was plaguing her dreams, and taking a heavy toll on her mental health.
The survivors of the war escaped to Vietnam and to Thailand. The author of the book is telling the story in a straightforward and descriptive manner. When telling the story she did not have any difficult times in revealing her importance. This allows the story to create its own impact on the readers. Ungs did not tell in the story the reason as to why the leaders in Khmer Rouge who took over power after war were involved in the process of forging a cruelty regime. But the author did tell her best. “After each round of rifle fire, people push and shove one another in a panicked frenzy trying to evacuate the
Loung was a spoiled brat until her father left her like a side chick. Throughout first they killed my father, Lounge took-in the importance of grit factors and insecurity factors to be successful. One factor that led to Loungs success in first they killed my father was grit. Loung had shown grit by not giving up when times had got hard when the Khmer Rouge army invaded her city forcing her to flee because the Khmer Rouge army wanted to create an agrarian society, whose economy is based on producing and maintaining crops and farmland, Pol Pot wanted to conduct his radical experiment to create an equal utopia for all people. However, Loung valiancy availed her to get to America, but her insecurity had gotten in the way from time to time making her believe that nothing good will happen which then later led to her success.
...ld man lies. This overwhelming sense of superiority, leads him to sit too long at the scene of the crime, which in the end causes his nerves to get the best of him. Prince Prospero, like the servant, thinks himself so keen that he has the audacity to throw a grand celebration at a time when the world should be weeping. He is so confident that he will cheat death that when Death walks into his ball dressed as a corpse splattered in crimson, obviously a victim of the Red Death, he tries to kill Death. He draws a dagger and plans on killing the "man" who would dare insult him at his own party, but then death spins on him, and his gaze slays the prince instantly.
In the play, Hamlet is a tragic hero since he does not try to stop the war but conduct a revenge that becomes a vicious circle. He is unable to make a decision whether he should revenge on the death of the elder King or not, losing the characteristics that heroes have. Surprisingly, Hamlet kills Polonius in a moment, meaning he kills other people’s father as well. He detests the behavior of Claudius, now he has become another Claudius. Thus, Polonius’s son, Laertes starts getting revenge for his father’s murder. Laertes states, “To hell, allegiance! Vow, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation. To this point I stand that both the worlds I give to negligence. Let come what comes, only I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father.” (4.5 129-134) Hamlet wants to get revenge for his father because he is experiencing the loss of a loved one; however, he causes other people suffering the same pain. Comparing the two people taking revenge, Laertes displays more characteristics of a hero and is more manly than
The first type of violence that Yeong-hye experiences is verbal abuse. In early scenes of the book, Yeong-hye gets verbally abused by her husband. Her husband may only seem to be yelling at her, but verbal abuse takes many forms such as, harsh language and easy irritation, judging, criticizing and giving commands. For example, after Yeong-hye initially has her dream where she decides to become a vegan, she chooses to get rid of all the meat in the house. Her husband, Mr. Cheong, sees her bagging all the meat and gets easily irritated and uses harsh language around her, “There was a rustling sound, my wife was busy putting things around her one by one into black rubbish bags. Eventually I lost control. ‘What the hell are you up to now?’ I shouted” (17). Mr. Cheong took what was a calm situation and responded in a way that made it a more intense situation. He made this situation more intense through the use of the word ‘hell’ and his
”(153) It becomes clear that the parallels presented throughout the play are there to further illuminate the flaws of Hamlet’s character. Laertes is a hot-headed man looking for revenge. His father was killed by Hamlet and his sister was driven insane due to the series of events that took place because of Hamlet. Like Hamlet, Laertes wants to avenge his father by killing the man who killed Polonius.
The people of Ilujinle village called Lakunle the hero of the play and who was the village school master a fool as he wanted to change the village people “TO COME OUT OF THEIR IGNORANT AND SUPERSTITIOUS WAY OF LIFE”. He also spoke many words from his little dictionary which was unknown to the village people he wanted to protect the “VILLAGE FROM THE LION BAROKA WHO EXPLOITED THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE VILLAGE AS HE RESTRICTED IN LAYING RAILWAY LINES WHICH WOULD AFFECT HIS BUSINESS THROUGH CART”. Though Lakunle wanted to do everything for the “UPLIFTMENT OF THE VILLAGE” and its people, he was “NOT WISE ENOUGH” to handle it.