Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of punishment to students
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of punishment to students
Even though Angelo’s case is a difficult one doesn’t mean there isn’t a simple solution that can resolve it. In general, faculty at schools needs to look at every individual’s case differently, and not generalize everyone’s situation. In this case, Dr. Sterling has a hard decision to make on whether to punish Angelo by suspension, or to let him go with a warning. Honestly, I don’t agree with either of those decisions because they are on two complete opposite sides of the spectrum in Angelo’s case. In determining Angelo’s punishment instead I feel that the punishment should fit the crime, the situation should be thoroughly investigated, and that the student’s guardians should be contacted before any punishment is given to Angelo. Seeing as how Dr. Sterling knew of Angelo’s situation with attendance and how if he missed anymore days he wouldn’t be able to graduate with his class, or get the Sons of the Civil War Scholarship, then he should take that into consideration when determining Angelo’s punishment. Since not all crimes are the same then why would you treat them the same? In this situation having Dr. Sterling suspend Angelo for fighting would not fit the school rule Angelo broke. Having his whole future jeopardized because of one mistake shouldn’t be the appropriate form of action. Dr. Sterling …show more content…
should give Angelo community service, or an in-school which in turn would not jeopardize Angelo’s scholarship and graduation. This would also follow the standard Dr. Sterling set for the rest of the school by not letting Angelo off easy. Additionally, Angelo has no past record for breaking any other school policies, along with being a good student, and being very involved in school, so why would suspension for his first offense be the right judgment to make? These are all the factors that Dr. Sterling needs to take into consideration when determining Angelo’s punishment. Since it seems Dr. Sterling has such a connection with Angelo then he should know that Angelo was never involved in those fights to begin with and shouldn’t have believed Brad’s story. That being said even if Dr. Sterling believed Brad to some extent he should have talked to Angelo personally and not allowed them both in the room together. However, say that Angelo did cause all the fight around school why would Dr. Sterling not keep Brad an anonymous prosecutor knowing that putting them both in the room together would cause additional drama between the two. In a way, Dr. Sterling put Brad at risk in the first place and should have spoken to the two boys separately. Furthermore, Dr. Sterling should have investigated the fights more thoroughly and not blame the first person that is accused. Dr. Sterling should have spoken to the school’s faculty about any information they had about the fights in school, and should have the teachers ask their students for any information they might have about the fights. Now, taking into consideration that Dr. Sterling is too busy to investigate the case thoroughly then he should have the dean’s look into it. After all that is the dean’s job. Given the circumstance of Angelo’s situation, both his parents should be contacted, and be informed of the situation.
Angelo’s parents should have some say in what happens to Angelo because he is their child and their responsibility. With that being said, Dr. Sterling should set up a meeting with Angelo’s parents to discuss what would be an appropriate form of punishment for Angelo. Also, seeing how Angelo’s future is also severely jeopardized because of this situation there is all the more reason his parents should be contacted. Furthermore, Brad’s parents should also be contacted to ensure that the two boys resolve their conflict and to settle things once and for
all. Ultimately there are a lot of factors that need to be carefully examined before deciding Angelo’s fate. In order for Dr. Sterling to appropriately decide Angelo’s punishment he should make sure the situation is thoroughly investigated, that the punishment fits the crime, and that the parents of the students are contacted to ensure a resolution. In following this method Dr. Sterling should have no problem in determining an appropriate disciplinary action to accommodate the standard set by the school and Angelo.
This decision makes it clear the most important thing for a school to do is to protect the students. It also states that the board of education, whose role is to oversee the schools, must make sure that the staff of the schools is protecting those children. This case highlights that long-term abuse can happen in schools if there are not clear policies or, if there are, that there is no one ensuring that those policies are
High school student “John Doe” responded to peer teasing by choking the student and then kicking out a school window. Middle school student “Jack Smith” made sexual lewd comments to female classmates. Both had a history of hostile and aggressive behaviors that are manifestations of their disabilities. On the fifth day of the school suspension, the district notified both boys’ parents that they were proposing expulsion and they extended suspension until the expulsion proceedings were finished. Doe filed suit against the school district and the superintendent on grounds that the disciplinary actions violated the “stay-put” provision of the then Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA) (later IDEA). Having learned of Doe’s case, Smith also protested the school’s actions and intervened in Doe’s
Ashley Smith was a young girl that was placed in a juvenile detention centre at age 15 for throwing apples at a mail man. Her short sentence quickly extended into a life sentence because of so many infractions within the prison system. Ashley suffered from extreme mental health issues and was place in a psychiatric prison facility, however this facility was shown in the documentary to be corrupt and their actions with Ashley were extremely illegal. Furthermore, Ashley wasn’t given the proper help and treatment that she needed, instead she was physically and verbally abused by guards in the prison, and she ultimately passed away in the prison. Her death is still being debated about whether
Based on the information provided in case 8, Crashing Planes and Tranquil Dreams, Richard is a 4 years old boy, who is experiencing challenging behaviors at school, as well as at home. Richard lives with both parents, and two older brothers. Richard has been attending the YMCA’s full-day preschool program for the past 2 years. He is described as a “good kid” by parents and teacher, however, he is constantly active, impulsive, and frequently becoming involved in conflicts with adults. Parents are continuously working, and as mentioned in this case, they have to spend most of the time at home yelling at Richard or putting him in time-out as part of his consequences for not listening or misbehaving.
A new policy is needed and most certainly should start out with holding schools to handle their own discipline situations, rather than relying on school security and police (Wilson, 2014). School administrators must be able to differentiate between what is a true discipline situation and when a student simply made a mistake. The rate of school suspensions have skyrocketed over the last thirty years from 1.7 million nationwide to 3.1 million and growing today (ACLU, n.d.). Each school needs to create policies of when to get school security involved and what the school’s security job involves. Unless there is a true threat to the safety of the school and/or its student’s law enforcement should never be called (Wison, 2014). The instinct to dial 911 at every infraction has to stop. Furthermore the schools must develop a gender and racial fairness; black children should not be receiving harsher punishments for similar infractions of white students (Wilson,
Another major reason why juveniles are ending up in the juvenile justice system is because many schools have incorporate the zero tolerance policy and other extreme school disciplinary rules. In response to violent incidents in schools, such as the Columbine High School massacre, school disciplinary policies have become increasingly grave. These policies have been enacted at the school, district and state levels with the hopes of ensuring the safety of students and educators. These policies all rely on the zero tolerance policy. While it is understandable that protecting children and teachers is a priority, it is not clear that these strict policies are succeeding in improving the safety in schools.
The intent of this argumentative research paper, is to take a close look at school systems disciplinary policies and the effect they have on students. While most school systems in the nation have adopted the zero tolerance policies, there are major concerns that specific students could be targeted, and introduced into the criminal justice system based on these disciplinary policies. This research paper is intended to focus on the reform of zero tolerance policies, and minimizing the school to prison pipeline.
In the most recent years, the relationship between educational institutions and the juvenile justice system, which was once created to protect children, has displayed an ultimatum for minors through “zero tolerance” policies that result in sending individuals from school to prison to pipeline. Studies have shown that these policies are not beneficial to students or the educational environment that should be guaranteed to children. Opponents argue that the policies promote safety, but through this research it can be concluded that the policies actually increase danger. Studies demonstrate the factors that affect the enforcement of these policies which include media, the sociopolitical atmosphere, and the racial disproportionality, yet there are valid solutions for this issue that can be explored.
White, Tanika. "Student Conduct Policy Studied; City Schools to Review Discipline Code, List of Possible Punishments; Use of suspensions criticized; Some Say Removing Child from Class Fails to Address Problem, May Be Harmful." Sun [Baltimore, MD.] 18 Aug. 2003, final ed., sec. local: 1.B. ProQuest Education Journals. ProQuest Information and Learning. Coll. of Southern Maryland Lib., La Plata, MD. 3 Dec. 2004 http://proquest.umi.com/login.
This injustice is commonly referred to as the school-to- prison pipeline. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, “zero tolerance” policies in schools criminalize minor violations of school rules, resulting in resource officers placed in schools lead students to be criminalized for situations that should be handled within the school. Moreover, students of color are three times more likely to be severely punished for their behavior than white students. This discrimination follows the student into young adulthood where they are more likely to be incarcerated. This continuous cycle of entering the prison system and then continuously going in and out of it was discussed in the documentary. Possible solutions that have been discussed to end the school-to-prison pipeline include: police being the last resort in fixing conflict, improving the student to staff ratio, and providing more alternative discipline practices. Recently, more schools are noticing the damaging effects related to taking students out of class for disciplinary reasons and have since came up with alternatives to suspension such as restorative justice, which allows students to resolve conflict through conversations that may include the student, the person the student hurt and their
Students being removed from the school due to police involvmenet in removing them, may also face possible criminal charges being filed against them, for infracttionsas minimal as non-prescription drug possession or being accused of sexual harassment as mentiond previously , happened to a student for hugging a teacher as a form of solidarity. Sexual harrsamentcharges that if prosecuted can lead to a student being labeled and listed as a sex offender for life. Egregious non-violent offenses that disproportionately affect black and Latino students, and due to law enforcement modeling, sets the stage for incarceration.
The director of the CSG Justice Center, Michael Thompson said, "Anyone who wants to make students feel safer in school, improve high school graduation rates, and close the achievement gap needs to have a plan to reduce the number of youth who are suspended from school.” (U.S News). Mr. Thompson made this statement with regards to the negative effects that “zero tolerance policies” is having on the public school system. The “zero tolerance policies” were originally a war against drugs, and other major issues that school’s faced in the early 80’s. Now, instead of creating a learning and welcoming atmosphere in schools, the enforcement of “zero tolerance policies” has increased the amounts of students who are suspended and expelled each year.
When people think of the term “juvenile delinquency” they may think of the extreme regulations some schools have begun to enact upon individual students in response to major issues such as bullying and school shootings. Criminal prosecution seems to have become the normality in many bullying cases these days as some students can find themselves being suspended for making guns out of paper, or even drawing a gun. Though these “no tolerance” policies that some schools have come up with in order to prevent delinquency from happening may help deter these negative behaviors in some circumstances they are in no way a practical solution, overall.
“Principals must be able to balance the school’s interest in maintaining a safe and orderly environment against the rights of individual students to be free from unreasonable discipline” (Hachiya, Shoop, and Dunklee, 2014, p. 145). This is a delicate balance to be sure, but one that is the responsibility of an administrator. Students have constitutional rights to free speech and expression, as well as the right to due process. This is very true with suspension and expulsion. Due process is very important here as well. A hearing must be held, and all parts of the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act must be followed.
He is ejected from the school during his junior year when the trustee who ws in