Analyzing a Mainstream Classroom with Two ESL Students

1931 Words4 Pages

English is a Language that many people struggle with in the U.S. It can be a daunting task that many American’s have to face. Especially because of all of the domains that make up the English Language.(reading, writing, speaking and listening). There are many factors that can lead to the failure of learning of the English Language. One component is English being a secondary language that is not attended to correctly. Even though there is many reasons the lead to English Language Learners lack of proficiency (example Mr. O’Malley classroom), a strong instructional input, scaffolding, theory, research, ELD standard, and a intervention will not be one of them. Mr. O’Malley is empathetic by nature, but the strategies he uses are not as effective as they could be because of his misconception. One he feels that because he is not able speak the native language he is not able to help. This sets him up for failure. If you think you are incapable of doing something you will not be capable. He is setting himself and his students up for failure based solely on his negativity. Secondly his strategies are the same for all of his students. English Language Learners.(ESL) and the rest of the mainstream classmates need different techniques for learning the English language. The same is also for ELL group. Every child is unique and that is not exception for ELLs. Mr. O’Malley falls into the misconception that all ELL students who proficient in one domain they are proficient in another domain. That is if Mikhail is good at speaking he should also be good at writing, The other mistake he makes is he is comparing one student to another. He needs to learn about each level of acquisitions and that every child will reach them in different order... ... middle of paper ... ...ing Mikahi interactive journals. It is important to make sure that the words and topics are suitable to the child level of acquisition. (Syrja,2011) In conclusion, many things can lead to a lack of proficiency such as misconceptions; however, visual scaffoldings are not one of them. Neither is instructional input like sheltered instruction. Sheltered instruction is a type of instruction that makes things we read, write, and listen to more comprehensible and correlates well with the comprehensible input theory and the Total Response Approach. Theories, instruction, scaffolding, and research are used to help meet the goals set forth by the English Language Development Standards. They are also helpful in meeting academic achievements need to meet the Common Core Standards, If these fall to help children other standards-based interventions/activities will help.

Open Document