Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The women of shakespear richard ii
The women of shakespear richard ii
Social hierarchy in Canterbury tales
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The women of shakespear richard ii
Sigmund Freud identifies three aspects of the psyche - the id, ego, and superego – which influence every individual’s daily life. The id tells a person to eat, drink, sleep, and procreate in order to survive while the ego wears masks to interact with society. Lastly, the superego, also known as the conscience, informs a person’s morality. In Richard III, William Shakespeare presents secular characters who do not pay attention to religious or spiritual matters. Richard, the main character and Lord Protector of the future king, and Arcite, a knight, from The Canterbury Tales, by Geoffrey Chaucer, use the three parts of their psyches in similar ways. Richard and Arcite each use their ids in negative manners when dealing with women. They each …show more content…
When he finally goes to battle with Richmond, Richard’s horse dies; therefore, he has to fight on foot. This situation frightens Richard and causes him to yell during the battle, “A horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse” (143). Richard forgets about the courage that he feigns for society; he wishes for a horse to save him and says that he would rather give up the kingdom in order to save his life. He ends his bravery and does not make use of the ego that allows society to see his tough and powerful façade. Richard forgets about the mask he wears for the general public; he no longer behaves the way he and his ego want. Because Richard does not take advantage of his ego, the citizens of England stop thinking of him as a brave man who can rule the country, causing chaos in the battle until his death. Just like Richard forgets his ego, in The Canterbury Tales, Arcite overlooks the powerful mask that he wears with society when Theseus banishes him from his lands. He stops eating and drinking, causing him to thin. Instead of maintaining his usual physical strength, the way that the ego demands, he grows weak. When Arcite denies his ego, he removes himself from the stereotypical characteristics of a knight. This causes society not to recognize Arcite’s chivalry as a knight. Since Richard and Arcite stop caring about the ways in which society …show more content…
Queen Margaret despises Richard and has no wish to see him as the next king. She prophesizes the death of Richard, giving a hint to his superego, but he ignores both his fate and his conscience. Margaret’s anger arises, and she says to Richard and Buckingham, “He…shall split thy heart with sorrow, remember Margaret was a prophetess” (128). She strongly believes in her prophecy and knows that once Richard dies, people will believe her vision. Margaret gives an important and worthy sign to Richard about his wrongdoings. However, Richard does not process the prophecy through his conscience in order to bring guilt upon himself. Richard goes against his superego and has no remorse to correct his mistakes; he stops his conscience from reaching perfection. Just like Richard must die because of not paying heed to Margaret’s prophecy, so too Arcite has to die due to his main need for physicality instead of spirituality. Arcite prays to Mars, the god of battle, to request that he win the fight, a physical aspiration. He also enters on the west side, the side where the sun sets; Chaucer uses this phrasing to say that Arcite has to “set” - die. Since a knight tells the tale of Arcite and Palamon, cupiditas, Arcite, has to die and caritas, Palamon, has to survive due to the laws of Courtly Romance. Entering on the west side warns Arcite that he follows the incorrect
Shakespeare constructs King Richard III to perform his contextual agenda, or to perpetrate political propaganda in the light of a historical power struggle, mirroring the political concerns of his era through his adaptation and selection of source material. Shakespeare’s influences include Thomas More’s The History of King Richard the Third, both constructing a certain historical perspective of the play. The negative perspective of Richard III’s character is a perpetuation of established Tudor history, where Vergil constructed a history intermixed with Tudor history, and More’s connection to John Morton affected the villainous image of the tyrannous king. This negative image is accentuated through the antithesis of Richards treachery in juxtaposition of Richmond’s devotion, exemplified in the parallelism of ‘God and Saint George! Richmond and victory.’ The need to legitimize Elizabeth’s reign influenced Shakespeare’s portra...
The undeniable pursuit for power is Richard’s flaw as a Vice character. This aspect is demonstrated in Shakespeare’s play King Richard III through the actions Richard portrays in an attempt to take the throne, allowing the audience to perceive this as an abhorrent transgression against the divine order. The deformity of Richards arm and back also symbolically imply a sense of villainy through Shakespeare’s context. In one of Richard’s soliloquies, he states how ‘thus like the formal Vice Iniquity/ I moralize two meanings in one word’. Through the use of immoral jargons, Shakespeare emphasises Richard’s tenacity to attain a sense of power. However, Richard’s personal struggle with power causes him to become paranoid and demanding, as demonstrated through the use of modality ‘I wish’ in ‘I wish the bastards dead’. This act thus becomes heavily discordant to the accepted great chain of being and conveys Richard’s consumption by power.
Richard being generous gave his younger brother rewards of several lands in England and he also made John the Count of Mortain in France. Whilst he was planning to go through a series of wars, Richard did not want his brother to enter England and he forced John to promise that he wouldn’t and John kept his word until he found out that Richard was intending to give the role of successor to the throne to their nephew. John felt that he should be king and he entered England, breaking his promise and tried to persuade the English people in order to gain the throne but the English woul...
Throughout the works of famous pieces of literature such as Dante Alighieri’s Inferno and William Shakespeare’s King Lear, the common theme of justice is prevalent throughout the works. Often resulting in physical pain, the concept of justice throughout these two works of literature reinforces the brute and cruel perspective that Dante and King Lear experience firsthand. The subsequent death of King Lear after Cordelia demonstrates the ultimate guilt in which King Lear experienced due to his arrogant and ignorant perception of the amount of love that Cordelia feels towards her father. Dante’s journey through the afterlife conveys the illumination of his transformation from a sinner who lost his path, to a spiritually righteous man.
Jealous of his brother's power, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, starts to secretly aspire the throne and plots to guilt trip his brother, King Edward, to death and lock up Edward's two sons. The same pool of blood consumes Richard, for the murders were endless. He did whatever ...
...nt in their life down to their lowest point, and even their deaths. Pride and greed brought down two significant characters from literature, as well as Napoleon in early nineteenth century, showing that the fatal flaws are timeless.
Written during a time of peace immediately following the conclusion of the War of the Roses between the Yorks and the Lancasters, William Shakespeare’s play Richard III showcases a multi-faceted master of linguistic eloquence, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, a character who simultaneously manages to be droll, revolting, deadly, yet fascinating. Richard's villainy works in a keen, detestable manner, manifesting itself in his specific use or, rather, abuse of rhetoric. He spends a substantial amount of time directly interacting and therefore breaking the fourth wall and orating to the audience in order to forge a relationship with them, to make members not only his confidants of murderous intentions, but also his accomplices and powerless, unwilling cohorts to his wrongdoings. Through the reader’s exploration of stylistic and rhetorical stratagem in the opening and final soliloquies delivered by Richard, readers are able to identify numerous devices which provide for a dramatic effect that make evident the psychological deterioration and progression of Richard as a character and villain.
This contributes to a very villainous role. Richard begins his journey to the throne. He manipulates Lady Anne. into marrying him, even though she knows that he murdered her first. husband.
The task which Shakespeare undertook was to mold the hateful constitution of Richard's Moral; character. Richard had to contend with the prejudices arising from his bodily deformity which was considered an indication of the depravity and wickedness of his nature. Richard's ambitious nature, his elastic intellect, and his want of faith in goodness conspire to produce his tendency to despise and degrade every surrounding being and object, even as his own person. He is never sincere except when he is about to commit a murder.
According to many, Shakespeare intentionally portrays Richard III in ways that would have the world hail him as the ultimate Machiavel. This build up only serves to further the dramatic irony when Richard falls from his throne. The nature of Richard's character is key to discovering the commentary Shakespeare is delivering on the nature of tyrants. By setting up Richard to be seen as the ultimate Machiavel, only to have him utterly destroyed, Shakespeare makes a dramatic commentary on the frailty of tyranny and such men as would aspire to tyrannical rule.
In The Alchemist, Ben Johnson's treatment of the self works to maintain a conservative worldview where identity is intimately tied to one's social standing. The permanence of the self is shown to be dependant upon both continued performance and ongoing social reinforcement. Character traits are treated as stubbornly enduring coping strategies rather than as signs of a coherent, internally unified self. Johnson's treatment of his characters' fantasies as vices to be exploited rejects the idea of an internally created self where fantasy is the impetus for change and self-improvement. The allegorical effect of The Alchemist presents an anti-existentialist treatment of the self that privileges knowledge of one's social role and standing above introspection and self-contemplation.
The id: something as simple as two letters, yet so transcendent and drastic; it causes unimaginable and disturbing actions by people. The id, along with the ego and superego are all part of a proposition known as the psychoanalytic theory constructed by Sigmund Freud. Lord of the Flies written by William Golding speculates that the ego has to deal with the inappropriate desires of the id, as well as the conscience, socially correct demands of the superego. Although the characters in this novel are indeed little boys, Golding portrays some of these characters as cold-blooded hunters and represents specific characters as the three parts of the psyche: the ego, superego, and the id. The evolution of their new identities acts as a defense mechanism freeing them from reality.
King Lear, by William Shakespeare, is a tragic tale of filial conflict, personal transformation, and loss. The story revolves around the King who foolishly alienates his only truly devoted daughter and realizes too late the true nature of his other two daughters. A major subplot involves the illegitimate son of Gloucester, Edmund, who plans to discredit his brother Edgar and betray their father. With these and other major characters in the play, Shakespeare clearly asserts that human nature is either entirely good, or entirely evil. Some characters experience a transformative phase, where, by some trial or ordeal, their nature is profoundly changed. We shall examine Shakespeare's stand on human nature in King Lear by looking at specific characters in the play, Cordelia who is wholly good, Edmund who is wholly evil, and Lear whose nature is transformed by the realization of his folly and his descent into madness.
This is a prime example of Richard using his authority by way of rulings and pronouncements rather than action, even to the point of disallowing an action. Bolingbroke, on the other hand, is quite ready to do battle no matter what the consequences. Moments before Richard puts a stop to the proceedings, Bolingbroke says, ". . . let no noble eye profane a tear / For me, if I be gorged with Mowbray's spear" (1.3.58-59). Here is a man who is resolved in his intent.
One of the defenders of the Shakespearean wholeness against the tendency to mistake parts for the whole, Leone Vivante, alludes particularly to the practice of modern psychology in letting some part seize preeminence. In Shakespeare, Vivante argues, “consciousness” is complete, final, self-evident, not a façade for more limited elements. Shakespeare “does not replace consciousness with the subconscious, the unconscious, the complexes, the instincts, the subliminal.” (11)