Analyzing Amazon's Whole Foods Market

906 Words2 Pages

The Wall Street Journal article entitled “At Whole Foods, Amazon Takes Rare Lead in Cutting Prices,” described how Amazon.com cut ticket prices on many Whole Foods Market items by more than 30%. Amazon generally looks at other retailers’ prices before lowering their own, but instead, Amazon slashed Whole Foods prices before checking other retailers. The article stated that the price cuts can be partly attributed to a “marketing stunt to mark Amazon’s [recent] ownership of the chain.” A concern of investors in Whole Foods is that the price cuts will trigger a price war led to a stock selloff among traditional grocers a few weeks ago. This article relates to two of Mankiw’s Principles: rational people think at the margin and people respond to …show more content…

One example of thinking at the margin would be Amazon selling Whole Foods products for less before examining to make sure they are selling for the best possible price. Amazon typically relies on collecting data that files competitors’ prices before lowering their own prices. By doing this, Amazon has the reputation of having the lowest prices, which is why the website is so appealing. Now that Amazon has Whole Foods Market, they have decided to ditch that approach for the time being, and price their items before comparing to other grocery stores. Another way Amazon is thinking at the margin is by not selling their products for as much, in order to offer structure to Whole Foods’ prices in the different regions of their stores. Whole Foods has twelve regions of stores and is a fairly expensive grocery store. The regions do not have consistent pricing, which can be a turnoff for consumers. With Amazon lowering prices on some items, they are lowering the prices in all of the regions, which is giving the stores an appealing uniformity. A Chicago customer stated, “This will make me come more,” which highlights the idea that these consistent price cuts are …show more content…

One incentive that Amazon responded to was being able to lure in shoppers. As stated in the previous paragraph, Whole Foods is an expensive grocery store, and therefore can be unappealing to many shoppers. Amazon is responding to the incentive of gaining more customers by cutting prices. Customers who have been entering stores have been greeted by signs marking lower prices. This leads to the next incentive hinted in the article: customers are responding to the incentive of better quality groceries comparable in price to ordinary stores. At a Whole Foods in Chicago, “some of the steepest cuts were in the fish and meat department, with rib-eye reduced to $13.99 a pound from $18.99 and salmon fillets dropping to $9.99 a pound from $12.99.” Because of Whole Foods’ standard of high-quality products, customers may respond to this incentive of better food for less. Another example of these incentives is Amazon’s tactic of selling their own products in Whole Foods stores at lower prices. This is a combination of Mankiw’s marginal thinking principle and responding to incentives. A couple of weeks ago, Amazon sold their Echo speaker in Whole Foods stores, discounted at $99.99, rather than its usual price of $179.99. Although Amazon could technically be losing money, customers may buy the Echoes at higher rates than they would at its usual price point. The article

More about Analyzing Amazon's Whole Foods Market

Open Document