Analysis of Michael Arlen´s Ode to Thanksgiving

682 Words2 Pages

The author of this essay, Michael Arlen, in his summary of the holidays, Ode to `Thanksgiving is nostalgic and bitter about the subject. Arlen’s purpose it to break down and criticize every aspect of Thansksgiving in a cloying, annoyed way. Arlen speaks of the “pointless” traditons that go along with Thanksgiving and the bland history of how the celebratory day was formed. The author does this by using strong rhetorical devices such as imagery, syntax, and tone. While reading this one may feel as if Arlen is personally attacking them, and their appreciation of the day of celebration. He adopts a satirical tone in order to convince the reader that Thanksgiving is a terrible day, and that he does not enjoy any particular detail of it.

The essay opens with the assertion that Thanksgiving is not really a holiday because it possesses none of the characteristics of a real holiday. Arlen attacks the imagery of the holiday, the participants, the lack of presents, and the lack of costumary values. Next, the holiday is attacked because it occurs during the "nowhereness of the time of year." The season is characterized as bad in both the "cold and sobersides northern half of the country." Last, the writer moves us to "consider the meal itself." He attacks the starches, the "sacred turkey" and ritual of the carving itself. The author creates a bitter and nostalgic tone, the emotion of the first paragraph sets the tone for the rest of the essay. The tone is set by the specific details the author uses, as well as the diction Arlen expounds. Arlen leaves the reader asking, "Is nothing sacred or important to this man?”
In the second paragraph Arlen demonizes the religious aspect of the holiday, calling Thanksgivi...

... middle of paper ...

...onification, and hyperbole. The author continues this when he narrates his view on carving the turkey as “ trying to burrow his way into or out of some grotesque, fowllike prison.” Arlen uses a double entendre here because he sees the turkey as some kind of disgusting jail that one must dig its way out of. The author also uses the word follwlike to describe the bird as a fowl, and the fowl look the torn apart the bird has when served for dinner.

In this essay, Arlen continuously vilfies Thanksgiving in an attempt to describe to readers that the holiday is not all it is cracked up to be. The rhetorical devices used in the essay are there to persuade the reader to agree with the author. The essay suggests that due to past experiences people may have viable reasons to dislike a holiday, but it is unecessary to force those negative views on other people.

Open Document