Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concept of moral responsibility
What is moral responsibility and how does it affect society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Analysis of HAL's guilt in 2001: A Space Odyssey
In a court of law, killing while mentally disabled, killing under orders and killing in self-defense are sufficient justifications for taking another’s life. With this in mind, was HAL justified in killing the crewmembers of the discovery, or were Hal’s actions murderous and should he be brought to trial? Can Hal be blamed? The computer basically has 3 excuses for killing the crewmembers of the Discovery. First, Hal was disabled. Second, Hal was killing under orders. Lastly, Hal was killing in self-defense.
In absence of free moral will, there cannot be moral responsibility. This is a point argued in Dr. Google’s class lecture. I assert that Hal did not have free moral will, because he was under orders, and thus cannot be blamed for the death of the crewmembers on board the space shuttle. In a climatic part of the movie Hal states, "I’m sorry Dave, I can’t do that. This mission is far too important for you to jeopardize it. I could see your lips move." When Hal recognizes Dave and Frank’s purposeful deceit and their plans to disconnect Hal, Hal has no choice but to kill them.
One argument is that Hal has been brainwashed and thereof has no freewill. Because Hal has been trained to let nothing get in the way of his "mission", he cannot allow Dave, Frank, or the crewmembers in hibernation to interfere with it. In terms or flexibility, Hal has none. Because all of Hal’s decisions are based on completing the
Page 2
mission he has no choice but to kill the crewmembers. Because Hal was programmed to be perfect and incapable of error, Hal thought he could do a better job taking care of the
mission than the crewmembers. Even when Hal makes a mistake in predicting the malfunction of the antenna, he attributes it to human error. Perhaps Hal lost faith in his human counterparts and reacting to his orders to protect the mission the computer kills them. According to the Dr. Pan class lecture because Hal has little no flexibility, because all Hal’s decisions are in terms of completing the mission, he has a very low ontological conception and thus should not be blamed for the deaths of the crewmen.
According to Dennett, in order to be culpable of moral responsibility one must have higher order intentionality.
This quote, an excerpt from the letter Rahim Khan wrote to Amir, reveals the inner torment Baba faced regarding his two sons, whom he didn’t know how to love fairly, and the guilt he carried for fathering an illegitimate son, guilt that is reminiscent of Amir’s guilt for betraying Hassan. All his life, Baba had been hard on Amir, withholding the fatherly affection Amir longed for, but, as Rahim reveals, this was also hard on Baba. Baba wanted to be able to show affection to both of his sons, but didn’t know how when one of his sons was illegitimate and the other represented everything that made him feel guilty. In this quote, it is also apparent that Baba is much more like Amir than either of them thought. Baba harbored guilt for betraying Ali, just as Amir suffered guilt for betraying Hassan.
This is only one of the numerous examples we see throughout The Odyssey of Odysseus’ crew members getting killed by either disbandment or his actions, yet he always has crew members? The same can be said for James Kirk as he always gives random members of his crew different appointments t...
In the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, created by Dr. Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick, the plot sequences that are symbolic. The section of the movie called “The Dawn of Man” has many examples of symbolism. First, there are five things in “The Dawn of Man” that show the endangerment of a species. Bones, the search for food, a leopard easily killing an ape, the frightened eyes of an ape during the night, and the first invasion at the waterhole show the Australiopithicine’s weakness and their failure to fully protect themselves against predators and competitors. Next, the conjunction symbolizes an important event in human history. For instance, the eerie yet powerful music that is played during the image of the conjunction symbolizes the spiritual unknown. In addition, the Australiopithic...
For every action there is a consequence. In, “The Ways We Lie,” by Stephanie Ericsson she quotes, “We must consider the meaning of our actions”
There are two different views that the audience can perceive as to why Hal constantly goes to the Tavern. Firstly, it might be so that he can escape his responsibilities. Second, it could be so that Hal can learn the lives of the people that he will eventually be governing. Depending on which one you believe, it will show your own decision as to whether you conceive Hal as being responsible and honorable or vice versa.
Moral Actions are comprised of an individual’s moral awareness, judgment, motivation, and character. Moral awareness is a person’s ability to understand the difference between acting ethically and doing the right thing under a given set of rules. Or simply put, the understanding of when an ethical decision needs to get made. In the case study of the LCS Commander deciding whether or not to assist the distressed crew in Chinese waters, the moral awareness of the commander will let him know that his decision is not as simple as right versus wrong. His decision will affect the lives of those in present need, and could potentially affect the lives of many more if he were to escalate the situation into international conflict. The action that ultimately gets taken depends most importantly on the Commander’s ability to judge morally. His emotions, personal experience, and ability to reason affect his moral judgment. The commander needs to understand the political environment, give his own experience the proper weight, but not over-rely on “gut emotion,” and clearly think through the
I was charmed by this film the first time I saw it, and every time since. It was the synthesis of the journey of mankind into the future and an argument for space as mankind’s ultimate destination. It was the best science fiction film I had ever seen, as it presented several different possibilities and scenarios of what could happen as well as what might happen to man in his quest to conquer space. The introduction of the computer as an artificial intelligence was an added plus. The idea of a machine making the same mistakes as any human being proved out in its own statement: that any glitches in its operating parameters had to be due to human error. Given that machines are incapable of emotions like guile, hatred, fear and sorrow, HAL was nearly as emotional as any organic being. This in itself was a glorious foil for man’s ambitions to discover the wonders of deep space.
I have been given the opportunity to give expert testimony on the philosophical issues that pertain to Dennett in the short story, “Where Am I?”. Dennett believes that he is being controlled by two people, and that he deserves a new body to separate the two distinct entities. NASA denies Dennett’s claim, and is not willing to succumb to Dennett’s demand for a new body. With this issue brought to court, I am here to offer advice to the court on this matter and offer my thoughts on what they should be considering. The current sub issue is whether or not Hubert (the computer algorithm mind controlling Dennett) is morally responsible. I will detail what is needed for Hubert to be considered morally responsible, and then I will try to show why I believe that Hubert can indeed be morally responsible.
...dson, ‘Thinking Causes’, in Mental Causation, ed. John Heil and Alfred Mele (Oxford, Clarendon Press: 1993) p. 13.
The second, and more complicated, of Campbell’s requirements is to define what constitutes a “free act.” There are two parts to this definition. The first necessitates “that the act must be one of which the person judged can be regarded as the sole author” (378). This point raises the question of how one can determine authorship. For certainly “the raw material of impulses and capacities that constitute [one’s] hereditary endowment” cannot be determined by the individual and surely have an impact on his inner acts (378). Further, the individual cannot control “the material and social environment in which he is destined to live” and these factors must influence his inner acts as well (378). Campbell allows that, while these aspects do have an impact on one’s inner acts, people in general “make allowances” for them, and still feel morally responsible for one’s self (378). In other words, one recognizes the effects of hereditary and environment on his inner acts, but acknowledges that his self can and should still be held morally responsible, as it can overcome these factors. Thus, Campbell claims, sole authorship of an act is possible. The second part of this definition of a “free act” requires that one could have acted otherwise because one could have chosen otherwise (380). With this final presupposition, Campbell states that an act is a free act if and only if...
It takes desire, guilt, and shame to abandon a relationship like Amir’s and Hassan’s. In Khaled, Hosseini. The Kite Runner he demonstrates the theme of betrayal by Amir’s actions towards Hassan after Hassan being a victim of rape.
Hal is a cold, calculating Machiavellian ruler. According to Machiavelli’s popular theory, being a successful leader has nothing to do with being a nice person or doing the right thing. Instead, it’s about being inventive, manipulative, crafty, and willful. Hal is an intelligent character who put all those attributes to work when he articulated a grand plan to fool everyone around him in order to gain power. One critic claims that traditionally there are two common ways to interpret Prince Hal's development. The first is to see it as a celebration of a great king in training who grows in his responsibility and develops into a mature political leader. The second view sees Prince Hal as a cold Machiavel who uses his friends as means to a political end, without much regard for their feelings. (Johnston 1).
Another one of Shakespeare’s plays, Henry IV, contains several examples of foils for multiple characters. One example is Prince Hal. He is the Prince of Wales and heir to the British throne though this isn’t made obvious by his behavior at the beginning of the play as Hal. In our first encounters with Hal, he is at his apartment in London and a sleazy tavern in Eastcheap, where he parties with his drinking buddies, plans a robbery, and takes every opportunity to stick it to authority. He has become a pain for his father, King Henry IV, who worries about Hal's serious shortage of propriety and questions what will happen to his kingdom when his wild son gets ahold of the crown.
2001: A Space Odyssey is just that: a long wandering voyage of the body and mind. Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clark collaborated brilliantly. In examining both works, the film and the novel, there are certainly differences, yet the theme and overall idea coincide thoroughly. That this was made in the 1960's augments both accomplishments. The visuals, seen in 2004, are still captivating. What they must've seemed like in 1968! I flout those who received this movie poorly in those days. Would I have received it as well without having a preconceived idea of its greatness? I can only hope I would have known what I was watching.
The question of moral responsibility and to whom one is responsible is one that people have struggled to answer. Ayn Rand's idea that one's values define one's moral responsibility in addition to Ai Weiwei's display of moral responsibility to the people of China shed light on exactly who Jack Bauer has determined he is responsible for. While it is clear that he desires only the best for his friends and family, he decides to be take moral responsibility for the entire civilian population of the United States. At the end of the series, this decision to protect Americans at all costs leaves him alone, on the run, and rejected by the very nation he swore to protect.