More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive effects of getting married
Why Does Marriage Have A Positive Effect On Health
Positive effects of marriage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Why “Why Marriage is Good for You” May Not Pertain to You
Inside the article “Why Marriage is Good for You”, Maggie Gallagher makes claims that marriage improves many facets of an individual’s life; including both mental and physical health, longevity, finances, and reduced chances of infidelity (Gallagher). The statements made throughout the article reference many statistics and studies conducted by various organizations and individuals, however, Gallagher falls victim to a number of common logical fallacies. While this weakens Gallagher’s argument in the article, it does not necessarily make it false.
One of the more common fallacies that appeared in “Why Marriage is Good for You” is the use of correlation as causation. What happens during a
…show more content…
The demographic used for the study is described as “highly advantaged children (middle-class whites with IQs of at least 135)…” (Gallagher). An IQ of 135 or higher is a very selective group and less than 1% of the entire world fits that criteria (“What Goes Into the Making of a Genius?”). With an IQ at or over 135, these children are more susceptible to anxiety, stress, and relationship issues among peers (“Social and Emotional Issues”). These troubles could directly impact their happiness and have a large effect on their lives if the issues persist. The results are even more limiting when the other factors such as race and financial background are taken into account. The lives led by these children are by no means typical and having access to certain advantages and a greater susceptibility to certain conditions can have an impact on the results. When 99% of the world is exempt from this study and the results are being applied to such a broad spectrum, it is not an acceptable application of the provided
The study required that participants must be given IQ tests, and also that they be observed in a classroom setting while interventions were put in place. Thus the adminsitratiors were able to draw results both from IQ scores and actual classroom preformance.
Hanscombe KB, Trzaskowski M, Haworth CMA, Davis OSP, Dale PS, et al. (2012) Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Children’s Intelligence (IQ): In a UK- Representative Sample SES Moderates the Environmental, Not Genetic, Effect on IQ. PLoS ONE 7(2): e30320. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030320
Marriage is the foundation of modern society and has historically been present in most civilizations. Marriage is associated with many positive health outcomes and is encouraged across most racial/ethnic groups. According to Sbarra, Law, and Portley (2011), the social institution of marriage has changed much since the 19th century especially in the way it can be terminated. Married African American or Black men are happier, make more money, are less likely to face poverty, and choose healthier behaviors than their counterparts that are divorced (Bachman, Clayton, Glenn, Malone-Colon, & Roberts, 2005). The converse is true for Black women who seem to be the only sub-group not to achieve the universal health and other benefits gained from marriage (Bachman, et al., 2005). This paradox in marital benefits have many implications including lower martial satisfaction and divorce.
Marriage is the legal or formally recognized union of a man and a woman, or two people or the same sex as partners in a relationship. Marriage rates in the United States have changed drastically since the last 90’s and early 2000 years (Cherlin 2004). Marital decline perspective and marital resilience perspective are the two primary perspectives and which we believe are the results from the decline. The marital decline perspective is the view that the American culture has become increasingly individualistic and preoccupied with personal happiness (Amato, 2004). The change in attitudes has changed the meaning of marriage as a whole, from a formal institution
Marriage is a commitment that seems to be getting harder to keep. The social standards placed on an individual by society and influenced by the media inevitably lead some to consider divorce as a “quick-fix” option. “Have it your way” has become a motto in the United States. It has become a country without any consideration of the psychological effects of marriage and divorce. The overwhelmingly high divorce rate is caused by a lack of moral beliefs and marital expectations.
More Americans are getting divorced at an astonishing rate, according to the McKinley Irvin Family Law, there are about 16,800 divorces per week. This phenomenon has triggered a general panic among young adults. Therefore, animated by their fear of getting divorced, young adults have elaborated a new solution to avoid divorce which is cohabitation. They see cohabitation as a test to avoid divorce. However, does cohabitation really work? Meg Jay in her text entitled “The Downside of Living Together” defends the idea that seeing cohabitation as a preventive way to avoid divorce leads to increase the chance of divorce. I believe that cohabitation
Is marriage really important? There is a lot of controversy over marriage and whether it is eminent. Some people believe it is and some people believe it is not. These opposing opinions cause this controversy. “On Not Saying ‘I do’” by Dorian Solot explains that marriage is not needed to sustain a relationship or a necessity to keep it healthy and happy. Solot believes that when a couple gets married things change. In “For Better, For Worse”, Stephanie Coontz expresses that marriage is not what is traditional in society because it has changed and is no longer considered as a dictator for people’s lives. The differences between these two essays are the author’s writing style and ideas.
...osh, D.E., Dixon, F. Newton, J.H., & Youman, E. (2010). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, With A High-Achieving Sample. Psychology in Schools, 47(10), 1071-1083.
...osh, D.E., Dixon, F. Newton, J.H., & Youman, E. (2010). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, With A High-Achieving Sample. Psychology in Schools, 47(10), 1071-1083.
The first main point of this article is that it has been scientifically proven that social class plays an important role in the intelligence of children. Middle and higher level class children are smarter than poor children. The second point is that there is a discussion on whether the problem of poor children not having a higher intelligence relies on the school or if the problem is at the child’s home. The third point is that there are different factors that can influence a child’s ability to academically enhance their intelligence. One of the most important factors is money. Other factors can be race, environment, and culture along with others.
In the book, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work (1999) John M. Gottman provides insight on the seven fundamental tools to construct positive relationships. Through long years of research, Gottman studied married couples and noted degenerative behaviors that hindered the formation and attainment of a long and healthy marriage. Gottman research focused on several key behavioral predictors of divorce, which he calls the “The Four Horsemen”; Criticism, Contempt, Defensiveness, and Stonewalling.
Intelligence is the cognitive ability to think, deal and rationalize new information, but what exactly determines whether someone is smarter than someone else? Well, many factors contribute to intelligence, such as education and heredity, but a major contributor is also socioeconomic status. In the popular 1994 publication The Bell Curve, socioeconomic status has been proven to have an effect on intelligence on lower-class households in poverty with implications with poor nutrition and health, violence, domestic problems, abuse and lack of a stimulating learning environment (pg.100). A proper nutritional diet during early childhood is essential for brain development.
To start it says that the centers for disease control and prevention, married people have a better health than those who are not married.” Married do have a higher chance than of being people are not. But that doesn’t mean people that aren’t married aren’t as happy as someone that is married. Once a marriage goes though a divorce then now that person that was happy by themselves are now happier than the people that just went through a divorce. Studies show that a person happy has a better chance of living longer.
Communities that revere monogamous, heterosexual, lifelong marriage, and promote getting married, report fewer occurrences of several social phenomena that can be problematic. Examples of social problems that occur less frequently in marriage promoting communities include adolescent pregnancy, childhood poverty, divorce, lack of psychological wellbeing, instances of domestic violence, drug use, and juvenile delinquency (Gault-Sherman & Draper, 2012; Village, Williams, & Francis, 2010; Waite & Lehrer,
The debate on whether to get married or stay single has been raging for a long while, with both sides of the coin having their own pros and cons regarding the matter. Many proponents of either marriage or single life have strong individual convictions, and it is difficult to reach a definitive objective conclusion. Is the married individual happier than his/her single counterpart, or is getting married just a comfort seeking ritual that people believe they have to fulfill at some point in their lives? It is necessary to dissect this issue in the light of four factors: health and other medical factors, the economic and finance front, mental and emotional wellbeing and lastly, the social factor.