Analysis Of Waking Up White By Jan Arminio

1324 Words3 Pages

I think that when Tatum mentions that “dominant” and “subordinate” identities have shaped my sense of myself, he means that in society, one’s dominant identity is usually the advantaged group that goes unnoticed, while the subordinate identity would be the targeted group, which would be the ones that society would think would be disadvantaged, such as mixed families, blacks, and interracial couples. One example that Tatum gives about “dominant” and “subordinate” identities would be when the targeted group, which is the subordinates, in this case would be blacks, who have been characterized as less intelligent than whites, and the “dominant” group would be the whites, who society tells them that they have “white privilege”. In fact, by being …show more content…

What did you find helpful about her process of “waking up” and self-education? How is your process of “waking up” similar and different from hers? What are some next steps for you? Be sure to refer to things you’ve learned this semester that have impacted you in this process of “waking …show more content…

The poor whites are looked down on from the rich whites. “The black children learned to fear poor whites more than other whites simply because they were known to express their racism by brutal and brutal acts of violence. The white trash flaunted their poverty and weren’t ashamed. Most poor white folks didn’t want to live anywhere near black folks “Hooks pg.199). “The white poor in fact make up the vast majority of the poor in this society. Then, the mass migration of poor blacks from southern states to northern cities created a huge urban poor population, where the white poor continued to live in isolated rural and suburban areas.” (Hooks pg.

Open Document