Analysis Of V's Naipaul

1093 Words3 Pages

Trinidad and Tobago has long been home to talent, particularly so when it comes to the arts. With a Nobel Prize win from 2001 under his belt for his gifts bestowed upon the world of West Indian literature, V.S Naipaul boasts impressive thirty or so novels published. Despite the number of books written, I have only had the pleasure of reading one, Miguel Street, which explores his time spent on the assumed Nepal Street of St. James, Trinidad, during his adolescent years. The novel itself is quite different than the traditional as it consists of interconnecting chapters each focusing on a different character as the narrator, the young boy, grows up on the street. Like many other East Indians in Trinidad who lived in rural areas, Naipaul and his …show more content…

This now shines the light on the very noticeable likeness between Naipaul and his young narrator as they both leave Trinidad and Tobago and their own streets as a kind of rejection to the society and culture that perpetuated them both. From reading Miguel Street we see that Naipaul understood the creole culture, even though most of his characters are stereotypical in their nature, well enough to create a number of characters with their own set of unique habits. This was not just through the use of creole culture but also the imposing colonialism as seen in how some characters behave. When it was said that Naipaul was “gentle” with his characters he made no move to deny it but went on to state he “would not have them home to tea.” Using Miguel Street, I will present evidence not only supporting his gentleness but also assessing why he would not have afternoon tea with the characters from Miguel …show more content…

This practice was first observed by Hat who gave him a room when he came around searching for one. This habit had apparently impressed Hat. Bogart is merely playing a card game, he is not setting out to fulfil some great purpose nor is he doing something unbelievable and deserving of anything more but yet is still impressed. This goes to show just what is appreciated in the street community. His ability to stick to one thing continuously was an accomplishment in this backwards street. Like many others, it is stated that, “he made a pretence of making a living by tailoring,” as the boy goes on to say, “I cannot remember him making suit.” He undertook the label of a tailor but not once did her ever stitch or hem or create a garment for anyone. He did absolutely nothing to earn the label but just adopted it so he can have something to say about himself knowing there was nothing he had truly attained in his life. Without any responsibilities holding him to Miguel Street, Bogart disappears one day without a single word and was missed regardless of his lack of social skills. When he returned he was a changed man who spoke more and “was just like an

Open Document