Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ts Eliot's contribution towards poetry
Ts Eliot's contribution towards poetry
Metaphor by plath poetry explanations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ts Eliot's contribution towards poetry
vHilda Doolittle was a 20th century American poet belonging to the avant-garde Imagist group along with Ezra Pound and T.S. Eliot. The Imagist movement in poetry with its definite stress on ‘preparedness for writing’, ‘impersonality in written work’ and objective treatment of things through the use of images that ‘have a variable significance’ (Pound, 36) sees its most creative use in H.D’s poems. Unlike works by Eliot or Pound which follow more of what Albright labels as ‘particle nature of poetry ’, H.D’s poems on the other hand make a conscious move away from and yet adheres to the Imagist dictum of ‘make new’.
According to the modernist poetics, a poem’s strongest meaning resides in its smallest elements – symbols, image, vortex have a
…show more content…
As its amplitude and frequency increase, the poem-wave loses any sense of a finite subject in a particular historical situation’ (Alright, 21). Not only specific to H.D, this measure of poetry could also be used to analyze some poems by Eliot and Pound. A central tenant of this kind of poetics is the frequent use of aquatic metaphors where the whole world is described in the form of an ocean – which recurs frequently in Eliot’s poems like ‘The Wasteland’, ‘The Hollow Men’, ‘The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock’, ‘The Four Cantos’ and so on- a more specific example being H.D’s ‘Oread’ where she …show more content…
The individual subject is displaced in favour of a universal emphasis, such that disturbance at one point could, in such a fluid movement, lead to a universal disturbance. This was also the kind of effect that the modernist movement aimed to achieve, as Eliot writes in Tradition and Individual Talent,
‘The historical sense compels a man to write not merely with his own generation in his bones, but with the feeling that the whole of the literature of Europe from Homer and within it the whole of the literature of his own country has a simultaneous existence and constitutes of a simultaneous order...no poet or artist has a complete meaning alone’ (40)
II
Beginning with ‘Edith Gray’, Hilda Doolittle has used several pseudonyms for her writings which include J. Brenan, Rhoda Peter, Helga Dart, Helga Dorn, John Helforth, D.A. Hell, Delia Alton and more popularly H.D. While this conscious attempt at trying to hide her personality is in tandem with the major thrust of the modernist movement to move away from the mushy and to objectify passion or emotions with images which are at once universal and of contemporary appeal; it also forms a part of her poetic strategy. As has been previously argued, H.D is at once a modernist and a deviant from this label. This could be more legitly explained from the fact that she was a woman poet trying to carve a niche for herself in a predominantly masculine world. As Cixous would call
Poetry’s role is evaluated according to what extent it mirrors, shapes and is reshaped by historical events. In the mid-19th century, some critics viewed poetry as “an expression of the poet’s personality, a manifestation of the poet’s intuition and of the social and historical context which shaped him” ( Preminger, Warnke, Hardison 511). Analysis of the historical, social, political and cultural events at a certain time helps the reader fully grasp a given work. The historical approach is necessary in order for given allusions to be situated in their social, political and cultural background. In order to escape intentional fallacy, a poet should relate his work to universal
Everett, Nicholas From The Oxford Companion to Twentieth-century Poetry in English. Ed. Ian Hamiltong. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. Copyright 1994 by Oxford University Press.
With time comes change, change in the human experience. That fact applies no differently to literature, specifically reflected through reading ancient prose with a modern lens. A relevant example is the relationship between a father and son in Homer’s Odyssey. Through characterization on the surface, this significant relationship appears quite distinct in contrast to such relationships today. However, these quite humane and sentimental relationships are no different than those experienced today—those of a father and son.
Bolton, Matthew J. “Literary Contexts in Poetry: Homer’s Odyssey”. Literary Contexts in Poetry: Homer’s Odyssesy. Great Neck Publishing. 2007 Literary Reference Center. Ebscohost. Chipola Lib., Marianna, FL. 2 February, 2010. http://web.ebscohost.com/
Bolton, Matthew J. “Literary Contexts in Poetry: Homer’s Odyssey”. Literary Contexts in Poetry: Homer’s Odyssesy. Great Neck Publishing. 2007 Literary Reference Center. Ebscohost. Chipola Lib., Marianna, FL. 2 February, 2010. http://web.ebscohost.com/
Homer’s The Odyssey and Virgil’s The Aeneid are both considered some of the most influential literature of ancient times. Written more than six hundred years a part it is a wonder how they have so many striking similarities. However, a look into why they were written can offer interesting insight into the history of their eras. While Homer’s The Odyssey and Virgil’s The Aeneid share many commonalities including plot and characters, they each hold respective differences. In addition to each author having a different writing style, The Aeneid is used as a form of propaganda while The Odyssey is a record of Greek myths and values.
The notion of the author has often been disputed when it comes to critical literary studies. The argument centers around one basic question: Should the author be considered when looking at a text? There are numerous reasons given as to why the author is important or why the ...
The world is changing and evolving at an astounding rate. Within the last one hundred years, the Western community has seen advances in technology and medicine that has improved the lifestyles and longevity of almost every individual. Within the last two hundred years, we have seen two World Wars, and countless disputes over false borders created by colonialists, slavery, and every horrid form of human suffering imaginable! Human lifestyles and cultures are changing every minute. While our grandparents and ancestors were growing-up, do you think that they ever imagined the world we live in today? What is to come is almost inconceivable to us now. In this world, the only thing we can be sure of is that everything will change. With all of these transformations happening, it is a wonder that a great poet may write words over one hundred years ago, that are still relevant in today’s modern world. It is also remarkable that their written words can tell us more about our present, than they did about our past. Is it just an illusion that our world is evolving, or do these great poets have the power to see into the future? In this brief essay, I will investigate the immortal characteristics of poetry written between 1794 and 1919. And, I will show that these classical poems can actually hold more relevance today, than they did in the year they were written. Along the way, we will pay close attention to the style of the poetry, and the strength of words and symbols used to intensify the poets’ revelations.
Lattimore, R. (trans.) (1961) The Iliad of Homer, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, reproduced in Readings book 1 (2006) A219 Exploring the Classical World, readings 1.1-6, pp. 7-62, Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Concrete poetry presents its readers with a unique and often confounding situation. In addition to using language or parts of language in non-traditional ways, concrete poetry also uses elements that are more commonly associated with visual art. However, concrete poetry is not visual art. It is still concerned, primarily, with the use of language, generally to communicate some meaning to the reader in a way that is undeniably linguistic in nature. Concrete poetry is therefore an especially unique genre that draws upon and incorporates many different concepts from a variety of disciplines in order to fill in the gaps left when traditional grammar and syntax are eschewed.
T.S Eliot, one of many modern poets has always managed to produce great poems. When looking at some of his finest work such as “The Wasteland”, “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” and “The Hollow Men” it is remarkable, how one individual can create such exquisite art. In his college years, Eliot developed much of his early poetic style around French symbolists such as Arthur Rimbaud, Stephane Mallarme and Jules Laforgue. As Eliot grew older, he converted to the Catholic faith. From there on in, Eliot and his craft would evolve.
The consistent pattern of metrical stresses in this stanza, along with the orderly rhyme scheme, and standard verse structure, reflect the mood of serenity, of humankind in harmony with Nature. It is a fine, hot day, `clear as fire', when the speaker comes to drink at the creek. Birdsong punctuates the still air, like the tinkling of broken glass. However, the term `frail' also suggests vulnerability in the presence of danger, and there are other intimations in this stanza of the drama that is about to unfold. Slithery sibilants, as in the words `glass', `grass' and `moss', hint at the existence of a Serpent in the Garden of Eden. As in a Greek tragedy, the intensity of expression in the poem invokes a proleptic tenseness, as yet unexplained.
Doolittle, Hilda. "Hymen." (Hilda Doolittle) H. D.'s Poem:. ReadBookOnline.com, 2011. Web. 30 Apr. 2014. .Wordsworth: http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/174832
Many years ago in ancient Greece, Plato initiated a debate about the usefulness of literature by declaring that poetry had no place in the ideal society, mainly because it was full of lies and because it evoked undesirable emotions. His pupil Aristotle, however, took the opposing side of this dispute and argued that literature was, in fact, useful. Aristotle agreed with Plato that literature induces undesirable emotions, but he stated that it only does so in an attempt to purge us of these harmful sentiments, a process which he termed “catharsis”. The events in Homer’s Iliad, while used by both Plato and Aristotle to defend their theories about literature, lend themselves to the defense of Aristotle’s ideas more so than Plato’s. Specifically, the juxtaposition of Achilleus’s intense lamentation with the portrayal of Hephaistos’s shield, the description of Hektor’s increasing pride, and the account of Patroklos’s impulsive nature in battle all perfectly exemplify Aristotle’s idea of catharsis and demonstrate the true worth of literature.
T.S Eliot, widely considered to be one of the fathers of modern poetry, has written many great poems. Among the most well known of these are “The Waste Land, and “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”, which share similar messages, but are also quite different. In both poems, Eliot uses various poetic techniques to convey themes of repression, alienation, and a general breakdown in western society. Some of the best techniques to examine are ones such as theme, structure, imagery and language, which all figure prominently in his poetry. These techniques in particular are used by Eliot to both enhance and support the purpose of his poems.