Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of censorship on society
The effects of censorship on society
The effects of censorship on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of censorship on society
'I also didn 't have anything against Communism and all that [...] ' (p. 44). Does Plenzdorf 's text support or attack the GDR? The German Democratic Republic(GDR) was formed after World War II when the Soviet Union occupied the eastern half of Germany, while the United States, Britain and France occupied the western half. The GDR was under communist regime and heavily regulated by the Soviets. Films, books, newspapers, and other forms of media were censored and the authors were told what they could and could not write about. Suprisingly, Ulrich Plenzdorf’s book, “The News Sufferings of Young W”, was received well by the public due to its criticisms of the GDR. The criticism is quite subtle in the novel, but enough to illustrate how the general …show more content…
While watching a certain film, Edgar points out how the younger brother in the film is the only character he likes. He claims that he likes that character because he refuses to conform to all the propaganda around him. “He wanted to be a clown in the circus and he wouldn’t let himself be talked out of it. They said he just wantd to fool around instead of getting a steady job. A steady job, people, I’d heard that line before!”(p. 22). This opinion of Edgar’s criticizes the propaganda that communism provides a steady job, so one must look towards doing the common job, rather than doing something he or she enjoys. That key characteristic separates democracy from communism. In a democracy, a citizen can do whatever job they want to, and no one can stop them from achieving that …show more content…
Over the course of the book, Edgar and Charlie get closer, but he never fully trusts her with his feelings. In an excerpt on page 47, Edgar’s father and Charlie are talking about Edgar. Remember, that he is dead, but Plenzdorf has written the novel in a way where it seems as if Edgar is right there listening to the two. He says, “That’s right, Charlie. Don’t tell everything. There wouldn’t be any point to it, telling everything. I’ve never done it in my whole life. I didn’t even tell you everything, Charlie. You can’t tell everything. If you tell everything, maybe you’re not even human.”(p. 47). In this declaration, Edgar seems to be afraid. He has never told anyone the full truth realizing the consequences would be deadly. He has been raised in fear of the Stasi police, so any of his questionable actions and opinions are never the whole truth. One never knows who is a spy. Including this let’s the audience know that the protagonist hides a lot of important information in fear of the consequences. Including this text in the novel is important because it tells the level of intelligence the spies may have had when spying on the citizens, and it exposes the level of paranoia citizens had under
On Hitler’s Mountain is a memoir of a child named Irmgard Hunt and her experiences growing up in Nazi Germany. She herself has had many experiences of living during that dark time, she actually met Hitler, had a grandfather who hated Hitler's rule, and had no thoughts or feelings about the Nazi rule until the end of WWII. Her memoir is a reminder of what can happen when an ordinary society chooses a cult of personality over rational thought. What has happened to the German people since then, what are they doing about it today and how do they feel about their past? Several decades later, with most Nazis now dead or in hiding, and despite how much Germany has done to prevent another Nazi rule, everyone is still ashamed of their ancestors’ pasts.
In Elie Wiesel’s Night, he recounts his horrifying experiences as a Jewish boy under Nazi control. His words are strong and his message clear. Wiesel uses themes such as hunger and death to vividly display his days during World War II. Wiesel’s main purpose is to describe to the reader the horrifying scenes and feelings he suffered through as a repressed Jew. His tone and diction are powerful for this subject and envelope the reader. Young readers today find the actions of Nazis almost unimaginable. This book more than sufficiently portrays the era in the words of a victim himself.
“As a writer of fiction Böll was interpreting history, creating patterns of meaning, ordering his material to enable his reader to make sense of it.” The experiences of Böll and his values that arose from these events have been influential on the content and themes of Böll’s novel, The Lost Honour of Katharina Blum. Böll experienced both the first and second world wars and the effects that these wars had on German society. Events such as the economic collapse in Germany post WWII, the construction of the Berlin Wall, the rise of student based urban terrorism in West Germany in the 1970’s and the increasing state controls to contain such alleged threats can be seen to influence the issues explored in The Lost Honour of Katharina Blum. The novel is a comment on the press and the law, the labyrinth of social truth, the collision of fact and fiction and the power of language. Böll himself experienced the press first hand and this along with the experiences of Professor Bruckner, form the basis of his criticism directed at the powerful and hegemonic structures in society, in particular in relation to the police and the press and their corrupt relationship in the novella. Many of Heinrich Böll s views and attitudes, resulting form his context, are clearly visible in the novella through the portrayal of certain characters in positive or negative lights. The historical, social, economic and political context of Böll and West Germany at this time (1900’s) had a considerable effect on the issues Böll delves into in The Lost Honour of Katharina Blum and greatly affected my understanding of the novel.
Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: a History of Nazi Germany. New York:
However, when confronted with a strict policy of appeasement, by both the French and the English, the stage was set for a second World War. Taylor constructs a powerful and effective argument by expelling certain dogmas that painted Hitler as a madman, and by evaluating historical events as a body of actions and reactions, disagreeing with the common idea that the Axis had a specific program from the start. The book begins with the conclusion of the First World War, by exploring the idea that critical mistakes made then made a second war likely, yet not inevitable. Taylor points out that although Germany was defeated on the Western front, “Russia fell out of Europe and ceased to exist, for the time being, as a Great Power. The constellation of Europe was profoundly changed—and to Germany’s advantage.”
In Nazi Germany, it was very dangerous for reporters and press to print the truth because the government controlled what was published. Joseph Goebbles ministered what was shown to the public and controlled the mass media. He along with Hitler had a goal; to “Nazify the art and culture ...
His point was that with capitalism and the people working would develop to have less money and experience alienation that is viewed as the workers developing more separation and solitude with their own job developing into a feeling of helplessness.
There was no longer freedom of press. From the outside, it seemed like it was still the same and everybody could write what they wanted to, but if they did write something inappropriate or something bad about the NSDAP or National Socialism in general, there was a high change of losing their job or even worse, getting killed for criticizing Hitler’s methods and ideology. In nineteen thirty-five, the Anordnung zur Beseitigung der Skandalpresse (trans.: Regulation of the removal of the gutter press) was passed, which meant that publisher harming the press and the NSDAP, could be expelled from the market. Also, the new theme for a lot of newspaper article became anti-Semitism in papers like Der Völkischer Beobachter and Der Stürmer, whose editor actually supported Hitler in a big way.
In a recent article concerning the political movement behind followers of Garabandal, journalist Barry Hanratty reports “to speak of communism today almost seems anachronistic” (Hanratty). Communism today does seem to be an oxymoron. The United States’ Cold War politics have trapped communism in a different century and attached to this word those negative feelings once associated with foreign Communist powers. Americans have now forgotten the actual definition of communism, relying solely on the propaganda fed to America during its wars against communist nations and particularly Joseph McCarthy’s time in Congress. However, some individuals in America are moving past the propaganda and looking at communism at the root of its definition, seeing it - not as a totalitarian form of government, but rather as a system which distributes all property of a community equally among community members, making social class nonexistent and all individuals share equal economic status. Fran Rubel Kuzui proved to be one of those individuals by directing the television series Buffy the Vampire Slayer which shows communism as something positive rather than threatening. The episode that exemplifies this most is “Normal Again.” In this episode, Kuzui uses the two realities Buffy finds herself in to contrast communism with capitalism, showing not only a preference to communism, but also that it has a place in a new generation.
Phoebe Rankin - Professor Wilson - MUS 120 - 23 March 2014 -Werther by Massenet: A Live from the MET broadcast - Mar 15 10:55 a.m. - Cinemark Carefree W 3305 Cinema Point
The division of Germany into West Germany and East Germany emerged as a stopgap solution for the woeful state of the nation following its defeat in the Second World War. With the United States (US) ultimately gaining full control over West Germany, East Germany increasingly became alienated towards it, as it went under the influence of the Soviet Union (USSR). West Germany, officially the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG), rapidly grew into one of the most politically and economically influential nations in Europe representing the democratic interests of the US in the region, while East Germany, officially the German Democratic Republic (GDR), went seemingly the other way. East Germans became increasingly disillusioned by the way their politicians have promoted communism in the GDR, characterized by oppressive measures and sheer inequality in living standards. The Stasi, the secret police unit of the GDR, closely monitored East Germans and purged those who are suspected or proven dissidents, while politicians of the nation enjoyed living standards that are way superior compared to the average East German. West Germans, on the other hand, enjoyed the benefits of political and economic reforms brought forth by the democratic influence of the US. Therefore, discontentment among East Germans increased the prospect of unification of the FRG and GDR – an issue that was never written off in consideration, only further complicated by political differences. Nevertheless, eventual unification of the FRG and GDR following the symbolic collapse of the Berlin Wall did not completely result to favorable circumstances, as problems that continued to alienate matters between the Western and Eastern sections of Germany remain unresolved (Brockman ...
It could be argued that Germany is the "birthplace of European intellectual journalism"¹. However, media in Germany has had to endure frustration and trauma in achieving such high standing in the journalistic world; suffering the "fragmentation of the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries"¹, restrictions born of censorship and political control of the "long period of stultifying authoritarianism and relative economic stagnation"¹ of that time. Moreover, the Bismarck period, despite the first government thereof introducing the allegedly "'liberating' [sic]" `Reichspressegesetz' (Imperial Press Law) "was hardly liberal... Above all, the limited `liberalisation' of the press law reflected the rising power and influence of the industrial and commercial middle classes"². However, it would be the effects of the dictatorship and censorship of the Third Reich that would ultimately shatter, and the Allied Occupation of Germany which would help rebuild and redevelop the media of the defeated country. In this essay, I intend to outline the fundamental principles which aided the development of the media in Western Germany, with particular emphasis on press media, during the time of the Allied occupation up until approximately 1955.
Discuss the relationship between individual and society in Goethe’s The Sufferings of Young Werther. What features of Werther’s individuality make him incapable of taking up a “normal” position within society?
With his starting statements about the left advocating communism, reminds me of the youth countercultures in the early 50’s that were socialist in nature, and rebelled against any and every institution, yet wanted government handouts for being worthless hippies. They constantly protested the vietnam war for decades along with other liberals. Going back to Prager’s article, while reading through I was shocked that liberals had glorified and sympathized with the Soviet commies holding contempt for Reagan’s labelling of them as an “Evil Empire”; even nowadays liberals protest being labelled as gay or a man or a woman, yet continues to label everyone else as a racist, sexisst, homophobe, etc. I completely agree with Prager that the left spends way more time attacking the wrong enemy, but uses that to justify progression. While we’re at war with communism and terror, the left is at war with having the right to be 6’4”, bearded, 240 lbs, a penis, and still be a
“Among these dictators was Adolf Hitler, who called on the German masses to restore the national glory that had been damaged by defeat in 1918. He urged German scorn democratic rights and roo...