Analysis Of The Magic Of Reality By Richard Dawkins

Ethic Of Critque
Shunda Williams
Ethical Foundations ELMP 7310

The Magic of Reality by Richard Dawkins
Introduction
The ethics of critique is one of the key guiding principles that help in ensuring that there are appropriate investigation of the current application of standards and rules that influence the life of individuals. According to the analysis of the concept, the ethical issue that is always raised involves the fact that there are issues involving being unfair to the others that have been raised concerning the real life perspectives. From this notion, it is also proper to state that ethic of critique tends to challenge the status quo of situations that can be deemed

According to the book, there are simple and clear evidence that have been used in ensuring that a thin line has been drawn between the supernatural myths and the magical reality of science. According to this implication, it is possible to state that the book has used the real life situations like the appearance of the day and night and also the evolution processes. The myths in the bible have also been used as way of ensuring that there are varieties of sources of mythical stances in the world space. The author has used simple illustrations as a way of ensuring that the difference is appropriately understood. According to the author he intended to bring the ethic of critique into a reality. According to the general concept of the ethic critique, there are always aspects of injustice and unfairness that trigger the need for change and amendment of the current existing practices (Davies, & Brundrett, 2010). Based on this strategy, the book has opened and developed a picture of reality among people who tend to view different situations differently. Based on this factor the book has helped in actualizing the aspects of ethic of critique. These ideas are also based on the fact that people need to realize that there are some norms and issues that may need a change in the related

Additionally, there are other issues for example; the book has created a comparison view of the old ways and the current ways of scientific understanding of things. According to this perspective, the book has implied that there would always be gaps between the two sides of the issues being amended and the new situation tends to offer more superior stances from the previous ones. This contributes to the fact that change and amendments are inevitable but the benchmark for change is still pegged on the already existing situations that are considered inefficient. Additionally, this contributes to the ethic critique since the gaps are what are actually considered as misleading and responsible for harm towards different populations in the society (Davies, & Brundrett, 2010).
The book also contributes to the aspects of ethic of critique by always allowing for change in all aspects of life. Based on the phenomena, the book agrees that a change would perfectly suit the ways in which all the factors involved are developed. It is possible that the book finds some explanations more superior than the others and, therefore, worth adopting. Basically, the book has used the mythical and the non-mythical approaches in explaining how better some of the issues may