Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why animals shouldnt be kept captive
Essay on a giraffe
Why animals shouldnt be kept captive
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why animals shouldnt be kept captive
The Domesticity of Giraffes The text “The Domesticity of Giraffes” is a poem written by Judith Beveridge. It is based upon the concept of caging animals, specifically giraffes, and the negative effects of keeping animals in captivity. Judith Beveridge uses many language techniques to attract her reader’s attention to the negative effects of keeping animals captive. The Giraffe is depicted as a crippled, lonely, and unhealthy animal as a result of being held in captivity. The use of a personification in the line “Her gaze has the loneliness of smoke” emphasises how lonely the Giraffe is as a result of being isolated for so long, eventually leading to having empty, blank, expressionless eyes. Adding on to that, Judith Beveridge has used first
person language and positive emotive language in the line “I think of her graceful on the plain” creates the visual imagery of the Giraffe galloping gracefully on the plains. This helps us as the audience imagine and picture the giraffe as beautiful out in the wild. Compared to the rest of the poem, Stanza two shows the Giraffe as free, beautiful, and happy out in the wild. A metaphor has been used to emphasise this in the line “Her hide’s a beautiful paved garden of orange”. It shows how beautiful her hide(skin) is. This is compared to the sadness and depression she feels when domesticated. This poem depicts the idea of power and powerlessness, it conveys how truly miserable domesticated life is for animals such as the Giraffe in this text. Judith Beveridge wants the reader to know this, in order to avoid repeating the same mistakes and to protest to the idea of keeping animals in captivity when they should instead be out in the wild. The best part of the text was clearly Stanza two as it portrays the Giraffe as a graceful, free animal out in the wild. The worst part of the text is the end of Stanza 4 and Stanza 5 as the Giraffe engages in bizarre behaviours. This form of treatment towards animals should not be accepted and Judith Beveridge has composed an excellent piece to address this issue as it portrays the agony of a giraffe confined in captivity.
...” (Hill 435). The practice that she encountered many years before is still the same and the reader gets to see the dehumanizing effects of stripping slaves and putting them in bondage worse than animals more through the eyes of Aminata.
Many great authors that study human nature stood out the most during the period of time between the Imperialism and World War II. Among these authors were George Orwell and Virginia Woolf. Their study of the human nature is especially visible in certain short stories that each author respectively did. Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” and Woolf’s “The Death of the Moth.” In either of these stories the respective author uses animals to depict their complex ideas about the nature of life, men, and the whole world.
First of all, in The Giraffe, people want to harm the tall animal because it creates an uncomfortable atmosphere, which can be seen through the reactions of many characters. As a result, everyone, except the boys, misunderstands the habits of the giraffe, and wants to kill it at the end. One clear example of a negative reaction to the presence of the giraffe can be shown through the police officer’s reaction to the presence of the giraffe: “[…] the policeman who came and said, ‘if you don’t take it away, I’ll kill it with my revolver’ (Senesi 3).” The officer of the law looks upon the giraffe from Africa as if it is a criminal. Since the ...
The author uses diction in the passages to signify the effect of the author¡¯s meaning in story and often sway readers to interpret ideas in one way or another. The man in the story arrives to a ¡°[dry] desert¡± where he accosts an animal with ¡°long-range attack¡± and ¡°powerful fangs.¡± The author creates a perilous scene between the human and animal in order to show that satisfaction does not come from taking lives. With instincts of silence and distrust, both of them freeze in stillness like ¡°live wire.¡± In addition, the man is brought to the point where animal¡¯s ¡°tail twitched,¡± and ¡°the little tocsin sounded¡± and also he hears the ¡°little song of death.¡± With violence ready to occur, the man tries to protect himself and others with a hoe, for his and their safety from the Rattler. The author criticizes how humans should be ¡°obliged not to kill¡±, at least himself, as a human. The author portrays the story with diction and other important techniques, such as imagery, in order to influence the readers with his significant lesson.
William Faulkner overwhelms his audience with the visual perceptions that the characters experience, making the reader feel utterly attached to nature and using imagery how a human out of despair can make accusations. "If I jump off the porch I will be where the fish was, and it all cut up into a not-fish now. I can hear the bed and her face and them and I can...
As the speaker comes to understand the origins of the carousel and the mule, they notice that “The sky did not darken with this news / nor did a general silence fall on the strollers” in the park around them and that “no one even paused to look [their] way” (13-14, 16). These specific phrases in relation to the speaker displays how the speaker themselves are alone in this realization, creating an emotion of loneliness surrounding them. No one in the surrounding area seems to care enough about the plight of the blind mule and how it had been used for human entertainment, illustrating how people’s ignorance leaves those who are knowledgeable alone with nothing but their thoughts. Also, as the speaker was leaving the scene of the carousel at the park, they sang softly to themselves “Poor blind beast… poor blind me, poor blind earth turning blindly on its side” in reflection of the newfound awareness for the world around them (34). The specific way in which this phrase was worded coupled with the language used conjures an emotion of pity that the speaker feels towards the themselves, the mule, and the Earth. The speaker sees how the people around them are completely blind to the darker and less appealing parts of the world, choosing instead to ignore the open sources of information that is
Once while hunting for boar with Arab Maina, Arab Kosky, and her dog, Buller, Markham comes face to face with a dangerous, lone lion. In this section, Beryl is extremely descriptive and recalls the memory in a fashion that allows the reader to see the events unfolding through her eyes at a lifelike pace. “Buller and I crouched behind them, my own spear as ready as I could make it in hands that were less hot from the sun than from excitement and the pounding of my heart.” (Markham 87), depicts Beryl’s thrill at the possibility that she may go toe-to-toe with the lion. This excitement outweighs her fear of injury for herself; however, she restrains Buller, as to prevent him from trying to sacrifice himself in the conflict.... ...
Distinctive voices offer many different types of perspectives of the world. This is expressed through the texts “Lady feeding the cats” and “Wombat" written by Douglas Stewart and“Shawshank redemption” also written by Frank Darabont. These notions are applied through exploration of humanity and connections between humanity and the nature. The unique interaction of the world offers us a better understanding of these perceptions.
Walker goes a step further, however, by using hooking cows and hangdog looks to reinforce the major themes of her story”(Christian 185). Walker is a writer who can not only touch African Americans with her writing, but also those who have never knew what it meant to live and grow up in those type of conditions. Walker in her writing showed what be enslaved meant; she wrote from the angle of trying to entail the love overpowered whatever position they were in.
When animals overthrew the men, the governance of whom had long been oppressing them, they finally broke the chains of perpetual slavery. They no longer had to work extremely hard in the excruciating conditions solely for the benefits of cruel and greedy men, but for the benefits of themselves. They attained the freedom they were desperately striving for. The times of abuse and maltreatment have come to an end. In these new hope-inspiring conditions the animals set up to establish the farm in which there would be no injustice and suffering, but it would be the place where everybody is equal and happy.
In the world, there are many things that cannot be separated from each other. For example, shadows and light, right and wrong, and the two atoms that make up a gaseous oxygen molecule all cannot exist on their own. Nature itself is composed of many things, but there are two conflicting yet vital characteristics that cannot be separated from it- beauty and terror. In her work, “Owls,” Mary Oliver explores this seemingly incongruous idea. She argues that, because nothing is completely good or evil, the beauty of nature cannot be separated from the terror of nature. She argues this through her discussion of the powerlessness of creatures to the extreme situations and the existence of a dual morality within animals.
“God may promise not to destroy creation, but it is not a promise humankind made – to our peril” (Diane Ackerman). A tragedy occurred during the 1930’s known as the Holocaust that destroyed many lives and families. The World War II had brought sadness yet inspiring stories from individuals that experienced the hardship and suffering they endured. One of the stories that is against what the Jews undergo are Jan and Antonina Żabiński. The Zookeeper’s Wife by Diane Ackerman has yet to make a mark on the world considering it is not as well known. Even though it was illegal and against their code, Jan and Antonina were heroes for trying to save as many Jews as possible during the Holocaust. As Germans, they disregarded the law to help Jews and used
Giraffa camelopardalis. Better known as giraffes, these animals have been a great attraction to many zoos over the course of time. With their gentle ways and calm approach there is a reason why they are loved by many. When you look at captive giraffes there does not look like there are any physical problem with them. However, there are many that we do not see. In captivity they face issues that they have to deal with such as teeth, bones and how they sleep. They also deal with stress and anxiety in captivity. In the wild they face problems such as predators and parasites. According to The Animal Files giraffes tend to live longer in captivity thirty-two to forty years versus fifteen to twenty-five years in the wild. The question
The Giraffe is one of the most interesting creatures on earth, it is the tallest land animal on the planet and it has the tallest neck among all creatures. It is originated in Africa and it inhabits the savannahs, grass lands and woodlands. Although it has thin legs, it has a very strong kick that can lead to fatal injuries to any animal that tries to prey on it, especially lions which are more likely to target giraffes than any other animals. The giraffe would fight with other giraffes using its neck rather than its legs because legs can be fatal and dominance in the giraffe family is only shown by using the neck. The giraffe’s appearances are similar to camels in terms of features such as hooves, tall legs and long tongues, and its body movements are also similar because both animals have 4 long legs.
A lot of people don’t know what the term animal husbandry actually means. Through my research I have come to define it as the care for and breeding of animals. Animal husbandry has been practiced since the age of the Neolithic Revolution. It is still being done today and probably will still be done in the future. Today animal husbandry is very common and is actually a great way to make a living. A variety of animals can be domesticated and used for the practice of animal husbandry. It is a misconception that animal husbandry is only for the use of agricultural or farm animals. Domestication goes hand in hand with animal husbandry but animal husbandry does not always require domestication. In this paper I will be displaying animal husbandry from 1 BC and before, 0-1000 AD, 1000-1800 AD, and 1800 AD – Present times.