Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Writing slave narratives
The importance of slave narratives
Analysis of slave narrative
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Writing slave narratives
Tuscan does not only show signs of leadership in character but he is described with physical leadership qualities as well. Behn does not curtail the extent of her physical description of Oroonoko that credits him with his admirable qualities of leadership and grace and interestingly she affords a comment about Tuscans stature as well, “a tall negro of some more quality than the rest” (43). The fact that Behn would even afford Tuscan that comment, as he was a slave, shows that he truly does carry his own quality of leadership. Beelzebub and Aboan did not question Satan and Oroonoko and did not assert their own opinion so they proved only to be one-dimensional characters and tools to be used. Tuscan does not assert his opinion in a challenge …show more content…
He has the leadership qualities and drive to stick with Caesar until the end. He even continues to prove this has all the other slaves abandon Caesar when the Englishmen catch up to them as they flee for freedom, “‘Yield! and leave Caesar to their revenge’; that by degrees the slaves abandoned Caesar, and left him only Tuscan and his heroic Imoinda” (45). Tuscan then is punished alongside Caesar when captured, just as Beelzebub suffered alongside Satan, and Aboan was captured into slavery alongside Oroonoko. At this point just as Tuscan had something to gain from supporting Caesar he now how something to gain by betraying him. Tuscan falls back in the good graces of general Byam showing his disloyalty to Caesar, therefore, saving his own …show more content…
Beelzebub and Aboan emerge as characters that will serve their superiors with their obvious logic and reason but end up serving as flat characters that serve the will of their masters without a second thought. Tuscan emerges as a figure with his own leadership qualities but ultimately uses these qualities to his own benefit. Beelzebub appears to have leadership qualities as well based on his physical appearance but suppresses them due to his unchangeable state of being. Beelzebub and Aboan’s friendship with their leader is the source of their loyalty while Tuscan resentment and self-survival for himself and fellow slaves is the source of his lack of loyalty. Ultimately the second that proves to be most crucial to the storyline, although a flat character, is Aboan. Aboan is the second that has the strongest friendship with his superior so is able to commit a selfless act that Oroonoko could’ve have accomplished without him and the storyline could not have continued without. This proves that what is most valued in a second in command is not their presence, logic, or leadership but true loyalty that fosters from true
Roberts starts the first chapter on leadership qualities where he describes all of the qualities that Attila possessed and thought where vital to the success of a leader. Roberts goes onto name all of those qualities and they serve as the basis for the rest of the book. Each succeeding chapter describes one of these qualities a little more in depth. Some of those qualities that Roberts describes are: desire, competitiveness, responsibility, delegation, and decision making.
Brutus is loyal to Rome and also to his friendship with Caesar. He wants Rome to be led by a good leader. But he allows himself to be lead away with this thought by Cassius, who tells him that he is the better man and not
A leader in any tale is an exceptional figure, whether good or evil, they also display tremendous strength above all others be it physical, emotional or mental. Their qualities instill in them a reverence that all of their subjects come to realize and respect. The role of leader is usually first assigned to a different character and upon completion of his journey the main character usually becomes the leader or a figure who has the potential to lead others, the leader is usually a well-known, revered, however they are alone, both figuratively and physically. Beowulf written by an unnamed poet has multiple characters that the reader can identify as leaders, one whom is within the first five lines of the text. Shielf Sheafson, is described as the scourge of many tribes becomes the first Cyng of the Danes. In Sir Gawain the Green Knight also written by an unknown author, features many leaders the greatest of which was King Arthur, followed soon by Sir Gawain and the rest of the Knights of the Round Table. Sir Gawain’s trial is actually a journey to test his leadership girls. At the end, he realizes his error and becomes the leader figure he should be. Finally, Paradise Lost written by John Milton features two leaders, Lucifer and God, though each relies on either end of the section they both in body characteristics of a leader. The leader figure through time has many of the same traits. Each leader carries with them a particular set of characteristics that make them a leader usually through a sacrificing something, there is also a sense of reverence, omnipotence, and solitude.
There are various displays of leadership and role modeling in the Shakespearean play 'Romeo and Juliet'. When one hears the term leader, there may be some confusion around what qualities a leader may or may not possess. One should also avoid confusing a good leader with a good role model, because although a good role model may possess similar qualities, there are a few qualities that are required in order to be a strong leader. Two very good examples of the contrasts between a good leader and a good role model are the characters Friar Lawrence and the Prince of Verona, in Romeo and Juliet. The Friar may very well be a good role model, however many would likely hesitate to classify him as a good leader. Just the same, the Prince of Verona would be classified by many as a strong leader.
What characteristics do leaders embody? In today’s society, leaders convey strength and kindness with no attention paid to their downfalls. In A Separate Peace, Phineas is a leader with flaws, despite his high standing amongst others. John Knowles characterizes Phineas as a naive and daring static character in his novel A “Separate Peace” by employing dialogue, action, and Gene’s descriptions and feelings towards him.
Leadership can be defined in a myriad of ways; but for the purpose of the question, it is but not limited to the affect someone who takes charge of a group of people with authority or rank; to be an influence to those who look to the leader. In the epic poem, “Beowulf”, there are two different views on leadership based on their leaders {i.e. King Hrothgar and Beowulf). With King Hrothgar, he accepted the help of Beowulf to fight in order to defend the people of the Herodot, “Beowulf my friend/fight for us” (457-458). Due to the understanding of his age, King Hrothgar shows humility and admirable stance, adapts to someone who admires him, allowing Beowulf to fight for the people of Herodot. Beowulf on the other hand, shows his leadership by taking the initiative and offering his aid to King Hrothgar’s people, to fight the demon Grendel, who is terrorizing the people. This leader...
In Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, the use of diverse leaders plays an important role in the plot, showing vividly how strong personalities conflict. This is the case with Brutus and Cassius, the two leaders among the several conspirators. The story of Julius Caesar is set in ancient Rome during a time when Julius Caesar is to become king. This, however, angers Cassius, a nobleman, and he plots with Brutus and others to kill him before he becomes king. They do just that, justifying their actions by saying Caesar was too ambitious and would have gone insane with power. This backfires with the Roman citizens after an emotional speech by Mark Antony, Caesar’s right hand man. This forces the conspirators to flee Rome and go to war with Antony and eventually take their own lives. Because of their great leadership qualities, Brutus and Cassius take the leader roles among the conspirators. Nevertheless, they at times do argue over the course of action. Though Brutus and Cassius are both similar in that they are great leaders, their differences in character are instrumental in determining the conclusion of the play.
Brutus’ leadership and compassion for others make him a popular figure amongst the Roman people, and it is his reputation that establishes him as an influential individual. For example, despite the fact that Brutus loves Caesar like a brother, he warily joins the conspiracy to assassinate him. He does this because he believes that Caesar’s ambition would become tyranny and that Caesar’s death is a necessary evil in order to preserve the liberties of the Roman people. In his own words Brutus claims, “It must be by his death; and for my part, I know no personal cause to spurn at him, but for the general.”(Act 2, Scene 1, Page 1116). In addition, Brutus takes the reins of authority from Cassius and becomes the leader of the conspiracy. He gains this prerogative because of his convincing tongue and powerful influence. His leadership is evidenced when he begins to challenge Cassius’ ideas. When Cassius asks the conspirators to “swear our resolution”(Act 2...
done good for Rome and his people, but after the conspirators persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy, by pointing out that Caesar is arrogant and hubris. Brutus justifies his beliefs towards
Brutus states," Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more." III:2:20-21. Brutus says that he is doing his all for the sake of Rome and that Caesar's ambition scares him. Antony, on the other hand, proves that Caesar did not have much ambition, and that he loved his people. Antony says," You all did see that on Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse.
Even though Brutus loves Caesar and knows that Caesar is a good man, he lets Cassius talk him into looking deeper and see that Rome can't have a tyrant as a leader. He tells Cassius "Into what dangers would you lead me, Cassius, That you would have me seek into myself, for that which is not in me?" 1.2.65-67. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary Brutus knows that killing his best friend is not something he wants to do, but he's ready to commit such crime because it's for the good of the Rome and the people of Rome.
Brutus is a hero amongst heros, “There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat, And we must take the current when it serves, Or lose our ventures” (4.3.217-21). Although Brutus had his own morals and opinions about certain thing he would always set them aside and never let it get in the way with the fact that he only does what he does for Rome and only Rome. Not many people can do that in his situation but the honor he has for his country is more than enough for him to be able to hurt himself for the sake of others. His honor and nobleness can often make him naive leading to hypocrisy. He never lets his emotions affect his decisions and this has hurt and helped Rome in many ways, “But 'tis a common proof, That lowliness is young ambition's ladder, Whereto the climber-upward turns his face; But when he once attains the upmost round. He then unto the ladder turns his back, Looks in the clouds, scorning the base degrees By which he did ascend”(2.1.134-7). Brutus is known to be an honorable character because he always makes decisions that others couldn’t. He was not afraid of the consequences because he was so honorable that he was willing to suffer the most
Brutus was one of many Romans with noble bloodlines. Although Brutus was noble, he never used it to get ahead. There are many times when Brutus could have used the fact that he is truly noble but he didn’t. Many people argue that a noble man wouldn’t have killed Caesar. In some ways that is true, but Brutus’ case was different. A noble man would only for the good of others and that is what Brutus did. He killed Caesar because 7he was afraid of how powerful he could become. Even then he had a hard time doing it, and that is what separates Brutus from the other conspirators. Every other conspirator had little or no reason to kill Caesar. Brutus was willing to do anything for Rome. During his speech about Caesar’s murder Brutus stated “I have the same dagger for myself when it shall please my country to need my death” (III.ii.45-46). This shows how Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (III.ii.20-22). He was too passionate about his country to let Caesar turn it into a dictatorship. Mark Antony and Octavius recognized that Brutus was the one noble roman. In his final speech mark Antony said “This was the noblest roman of them all. / All the conspirators save only he/ Did that they did i...
From this point on, Brutus has to justify the rest of his actions as honorable and proper for the wellbeing of the Roman citizens. Even though he betrayed Caesar, he has to prove to himself (and others) that he is still an honorable and noble man. The fact that Brutus had to debate whether or not to join the conspiracy influences his later actions that change what happens in the play. One of the most important examples of this is when Cassius urges the group to kill Antony with Caesar. Brutus disagrees by saying “… Antony is but a limb of Caesar. / Let us be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius” (Act 2, Scene 1 Lines 165-166). The decision to keep Mark Antony alive was fueled by Brutus’s naivety and lack of knowledge of what Antony was capable of doing. Furthermore, Brutus did not allow the group to kill Antony because if they did, it would seem as if they were doing this for personal gain and not for the good of Rome. Brutus could not afford to the let people even
No leader should put troops into the field merely to gratify his own spleen; no leader should fight a battle simply out of pique. But a kingdom that has once been destroyed can never come again into being; nor can the dead ever be brought back to life. Hence the enlightened leader is heedful, and the good leader is full of caution.