Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cell phones have negative effects on communication among family members
Cell phones and their effect on family essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imagine you are an 14 year old boy or girl and you get surprised with your first phone, you race to your room to unpackage it and get it set up. You immediately download all of the social media your friends have been raving about. To test your new phone you text your mom, who’s phone is seated next to you. You look at your phone a see that a notice popped up, “Are you sure you want to send this message?” You are so confused. You select yes and your moms phone receives not one text but 2. One text says that you just sent a text and asked if you wanted to view it. You race downstairs and ask your mom what it is and she states that she has been getting random texts whenever people in her contacts send a message to anyone. That’s a lie. …show more content…
Weir states that, “According to FBI figures, the violent crime rate dropped 48 percent between 1993 and 2011. Child death rates are down. Reports of missing children are at record lows” (Weir 3). This shows that it isn’t necessary to spy on your kid because the crime rates have gone down a huge percent, and missing children report which is generally the most worrisome for parents are at the lowest they have ever been. This is important because with the crime and missing children’s reports being very low they would not take a random spike most likely. So your child is safer then they have ever been in the past. This is similar to technology, technology continues to evolve, it gets better and better. However it may take occasional dips. Just like technology children’s safety is like this, the safety of our communities continue to improve with spikes, and sometimes it dips but lucky enough for us, we are currently on the uphill when it comes to safety, and technology for that matter. Since we are on the uphill, we are living in an extremely safe time there is no need to use spyware to spy on your kids, considering your community, especially if they are a teenager you should trust them. If you don’t, something much worse could …show more content…
This is saying that when parents are overprotective, whether that is just not letting them be independent or by using spyware to monitor them, it can lead to pretty drastic metal health issues, or even the chance of them becoming even more distant then they may have been before. This is important because it proves that being an overprotective parent can have a bad effect on your child. Not only will your child not be able to experience what it feels like to be independent, it may also lead to your kid having mental health issues. For example, if you are too overprotective of your child, they will not feel trusted so they will try to rebel. When they try to rebel, then you will have to become even more protective, so when they have something they are doing they will not know how you will react, causing them to get anxiety. This is just one more reason why you should not spy on your kids. You should not spy on your kids
The expansion of the Internet infrastructure across the world, has brought an increased audience. Which has provided expanded markets for businesses and exploited new opportunities. There are virtually countless social sites and media used by individuals to access and share experiences , content, insights, and perspectives. Parents today tend to believe they should spy on their kids online activity. I argue parents should respect the privacy of a child's social life and his/her internet activity.
He did not expand his experiment to other families. He says that he does not want to restrict the kid’s access because if they see someone using technology and then tell them not to, they are going to be much less likely to listen to the adult in question. If a kid sees someone doing something and that same person tells them to not do it, then the child is more likely to question the authority of that person instead of listening to them. Kids always want to know “why”?
Internet is advancing every day, parents have no idea what their kids are doing in cyberspace and are contemplating the idea of spyware. In the article, “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben, he argues the idea of parents putting spyware on kids’ computer is a good idea to keep the child safe. Many American parents have no idea what happens in cyberspace; sex, bullying, and drugs. Parents are torn between protecting their child with spyware and allowing the child to have privacy. Coben uses his friends’ personal experiences to support his argument without leaving room for counterarguments. By using strong emotional appeals, weak qualifiers, and sugary word choice Coben creates a weak argument that lacks persuasion.
The generation of over used technology and over worked parents who work forty to fifty hours a week to provide for their family. While providing they are responsible for paying the utility bill and other important bills which include the cell phone and internet bill. Since parents are working so much they need to provide a phone for their children to keep in touch with them to see where they go every other hour. At the age of thirteen or younger children have cell phones already equip with internet access and many more options. Here they are capable of taking, sending and receiving photos, location and personal information.
An outline of current legislation, guidelines, policies and procedures within own UK Home Nation (England), affecting the safeguarding of children and young people.
Online predators, pornography, drug trafficking, piracy, and hate sites are just some of the dangers that a child can face on the internet. The article “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben states that parents should use spyware to monitor their children. Coben argues that parents should be able to know what is in their children’s lives. he believes that spyware can prevent children from being targeted by internet predators on social networking sites and even prevent children from being cyber bullied. I agree with Coben’s claim that parents should consider using spyware as a protection for their teens online. There are many possible dangers facing children on the internet and it is essential that parents install spyware.
I do not agree with parents eavesdropping some private conversation between their child and their child’s friend. It invades the child’s privacy and it would make him/her feel absolutely down about it since he/she can’t be free from his/her parents. Even if the parents tell their children that they have set up the spyware on their computer, they will always find a way to talk to their Internet friends privately. In paragraph 9, Coben stated, ¨Second, everything your child types can already be seen by the world-- teachers, potential employers, friends, neighbors, future dates. Shouldn’t he learn now that the Internet is not a haven of privacy?¨ First of all, this has nothing to do with Spyware. It is a good argument, but it doesn’t have to do with the parents actually. It’s the boy’s fault to type scandalous things on the Internet and it is his decision to do that. He shouldn’t have done that in the first place to avoid getting into trouble. In paragraph 12, Coben wrote, ¨Yes. But text messages and cell phones don’t offer the anonymity and danger of the Internet.¨ I agree that it doesn’t offer the anonymity and danger of the Internet. Nevertheless, he must’ve forgotten that people have a power to cyber bully other people through texts. Above all, the people who have a great desire to upload it on the Internet, could receive the inappropriate cyber bully. Hence, it also shows the danger of being cyber bullied. In paragraph 13,
In conclusion, it is important that parents give their freedom to make sure kids learn to be independent and now days most teens spend a lot of their time in the internet so by parents not letting them have their privacy there, they are taking over all their lives without even giving them a chance to “explored their identity and the world” like Boyd mention. Parents, need to realize that by over protecting their kids is like sending them to war without weapons because they will not know how to confront the world and worst of all they will not know they things they are capable of doing by themselves.
New iPhone-applications such as “teen tracker” and “MamaBear” appear to be quite useful for parents. These applications are capable of tracking the adolescent’s locations on a map and therefore make the parents know where their kids are at every moment. Additionally they activate the phone’s camera, for recording audio and video, respectively. Dr. Keith Ablow, who is a psychiatrist, has a relatively negative perspective on these apps, as they can cause implications. He says among other things that it is a license for teenagers to not to be responsible for what they do, and for their parents so they can see what their kids are doing, and not be concerned about their behavior. According to Dr. Keith Ablow, we have to get back to a place where people actually communicate and where you are capable of looking your teenager in the eye and know whether we are dealing with a responsible individual or not. He, however, states that under certain circumstances it may be okay for parents to use these apps.
Dr.Gray, the author of “Free to Learn: Why Unleashing the Instinct to Play Will Make Our Children Happier, More Self-Reliant, and Better Students for Life”, said “If children are not allowed to take routine risks, they'll be less likely to be able to handle real risks when they occur.” So in reality, these parents are doing more harm than good. Kids need to become independent so they can make mistakes freely, learn from them, and grow as human beings. Dr.Gray also said, “Students are prepared academically, but they are not prepared to deal with day-to-day life, which comes from a lack of opportunity or deal with ordinary problems.” (Brody) Gray is suggesting that because parents are sheltering their kids, and tracking their every single movement, they will not be able to solve real world problems on their own, due to lack of experience. The child will not be able to think for themselves or handle everyday stress.Therefore purchasing SafeTrack will not allow children to become independent individuals, because they are relying on adults to solve all of their problems. They have been deprived the liberty of making mistakes, which they can learn
The article was talking about how schools can just go into the student’s phones if they just feel that the student is doing something careless like bullying or might have something to do with drugs. (Keilman 1). Keilman writes what a school spokesman said "That 's perfectly within our rights within the school," he said. "If schools have credible evidence that cellphones are being used in some kind of trafficking...we have every right to take the phones (Keilman)." This doesn 't seem right how will school have credible evidence that a student is using their phone for some kind of trafficking without breaking the student 's privacy rights. The school would either guess and then going through their phone to get the information or to spy on the student. Plus Students like to play jokes on each other because that’s just how teen’s friendships, work and schools might think those jokes are real and blame the student’s for something they never did. Students have their own code when they are texting and some use words but make them have a different meaning than what the word really means (Keilman 1). This should make schools try not to be in a fair amount of the students privacy
Technology is so easy for the youth to access and there are many things that affect children through the use of technology. Children can misuse technology by accessing inappropriate materials, most kids today have smart phones and are able to access this so easily. Another reason children are affected by technology is that they are never taught how to properly use it, so they begin to think what they are doing is okay, when it is not, at a young age. My generation is more prone to the misuse of technology because they have grown up with it and it has been apart of their childhood. As technology becomes more developed it will be more vibrant in children’s lives and as they grow up it will become more of a part of their childhood. The more it is in a child’s life the more it will become more known. I did not receive a phone until I was 14 and it was not even an IPhone, but today there are children who have IPhones at the age of 8. This affects children because they are becoming more dependant on technology as a young child and they think that it is alright to depend on technology. They are given technology and they do not know how to use it properly nor do they know that it is not okay for them to depend on technology and that they need to depend on their minds to do things not just technology. The more technology comes involved in children’s lives the more it will affect them throughout their
"When letting your kids out of sight becomes a crime" Letting your kids out of sight, is that really considered a crime? I'm no parent to decide whether it is or isn't a crime to have kids out and about on there own without any supervision. I can although, explain from a teens point of view of when I was a child and how it didn't occur to me how dangerous it can or can't be to be unsupervised. Growing up, transportation was a problem for some kids and I understand why children would have to walk to school alone or with their siblings.
“Parents play an important role in the psychosocial development and well-being of their children” (van den Eijnden). Undeniably, the quote makes a bold declaration that all parents in today’s technologically advanced society should understand and follow. With 90% of teenagers between the ages of 12 and 15 using the internet (Sorbring), it is important for an adult to monitor their daily usage and behavior. “Only 39 percent of parents report using parental controls for blocking, filtering, or monitoring their teenager’s online activities” (Dell’anotnia). Parents should monitor their teenagers’ daily internet use and behavior by engaging in meaningful conversations and dialogue that allow for fostering a healthy relationship.
Consider a situation where a family is sitting at the dining table, the son pulls out his iPhone, connects to Wi-Fi, and starts chatting with his friends on “Facebook”. The father has a Samsung Galaxy S4 in his hands and he is reading the newspaper online and using “Whatsapp” messenger while having his meal. The mother is busy texting her friends. They are all “socializing” but none of them has spoken as much as a single word to each other. This situation can be commonly seen nowadays.