Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Application of philosophy in everyday life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Based on the readings “Schopenhauer as educator” by Nietzsche, Schopenhauer’s “thinking of one self” and personal higher education experience I believe college level education obstruct the pursuit of true education. As humans, we enjoy patterns and repetition. The issue with uniformity is the fact we become experts at fulfilling expectations and not discover the true self. Schopenhauer embraced his uniqueness. Although it let him into a pessimistic mid set he accomplished his true self. Overcoming expectations is difficult and the fact that Schopenhauer was able to accomplish what was expected, he inspired people like Nietzsche to do the same. It is difficult to stay within the lines and follow directions blindfolded. It is actually more difficult …show more content…
Textbooks are essential and informative, however it is not the main core value of education. If we truly depend on textbook, our world would be as naïve as natives in colonization era. Schopenhauer provides the difference between reading and thinking. “Reading forcibly imposes on the mind thoughts that are as foreign to its mood and direction” (Schopenhauer, pg. 89) Reading is an escape of reality. It penetrates the mind and alters thinking. “The mind is totally subjected to an external compulsion” (Schopenhauer, pg.89) although reading is prominent, it can impair personal thinking. “That the surest way of never having any thoughts of your own is to pickup a book every time you have a free moment.” (Schopenhauer, pg. 90) When it comes to reading college content, it has no originality. We are attaining our foreign thinking from a text that has been modified thus teach one purpose only and that is to provide facts. We cannot attain wisdom from textbooks. Universities provide textbooks that are a copy of another copy; that is to say, the information is the production of somebodies else’s idea following by, another mans ideas and so on. “All that has ever been taught is a critique of a words and fifty critiques of them as preserved side-by-side and intermingled” (Nietzsche, pg. 187) What can we obtain from a mixtures of words? Well criteria met. It is possible to have our own thoughts and ideas; if we only foreshadow on textbook we will become a textbook itself. “People who pass their lives in reading and acquire their wisdom from books are like those who learn about a country from travel description” (Schopenhauer, pg. 91) we have to obtain our wisdom from our own thoughts and not from what is editing in from of
Imagine if students were taught only formal education in school? In Spayde’s article, Learning in the Key of Life, he is saying that people will be anti-social in life if they are only taught formal education. Spayde uses Nietzsche, a German philosopher, who says that “Metaphysics are in the street”. According to Nietzsche, metaphysics mean “those final problems of the human condition: death, loneliness, the meaning of existence, the desire for power, hope, and despair.” Nietzsche proves that you can only learn the meaning of life through personal experiences and repertoire. Jon Spayde uses Nietzsche to prove that one simply can’t learn metaphysics in the classroom. This infers that if one goes to private school all their life, they will become anti-social and not get along in the real world. Spayde proves his argument that you need both personal experiences and formal education “to be educated” by taking one of the factors out which then shows that one wouldn’t fit into
In one of my first courses at Middlesex Community College, I had a professor who inspired me, just like Alexie’s father inspired him, and Bimbi inspired Malcolm. My professor could tell I was unable to understand a lot of the words in our history text book. Without knowing what you are reading, there is no way you can understand events throughout history through a textbook. My professor encouraged me to write down every word I did not understand and define it in a notebook. By the end of my semester I had almost a full notebook of new words and an A in my course. With the inspiration of my professor, I was able to expand my vocabulary, and gain a stronger grasp on what I was learning. I have used this method in almost all of my classes since, and it has always worked to my advantage. The power of literature and knowledge truly can take you further in life.
...orld. If students are deprived of reading books that contain different ideas than their own, they will become close-minded. What is the point of knowing how to read if students are not going to be permitted to do so? As Mark Twain once said, “The man who does not read books has no advantage over the man who can’t read them.”
Oppression is the systematic method of prolonged cruelty and unjust treatment, often intended for those who are deemed “different” by a hierarchical society. It’s a basis that can be found in the plot of a fictional movie or novel, but most importantly, it’s an aspect of both past and modern life that has affected multiple nations. Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor, is a humanitarian who embodies the personal experiences of what being oppressed feels like – how it itches at one’s skin like the hatred and stares directed at them. The reason he is so important is because of his stories; what he has seen. The insight and intelligence he has brought forth further educates those who had previously accepted the world with their eyes closed.
Elie Wiesel the author of Night and Peta Murchison (ted talk) both have a concept of hope. Elie Wiesel’s concept of hope is said “” Peta Murchison says hope is “”
In order to understand Schopenhauer’s philosophy, one must understand the concept of the will. Schopenhauer seems to describe the will as a blind force of our feelings, our thoughts, and our perception. The only way we see the world is through the will. We are limited because we only see our representation of it through the will, not the actual reality, the thing in of itself. For this reason the world is will, our will, and it has desires. These desires are insatiable, so life becomes defined by suffering. Suffering, however, is only our representation. The world in of itself, aside from our representation, has no suffering. Schopenhauer says the only way to escape the will, which is suffering, is through knowledge and art. There is a distinction between ordinary knowledge and pure knowledge, however. Ordinary knowledge, according to Schopenhauer, was a result of the will. Pure knowledge is actual contemplation of the world in of itself without influence from the will. This can only be attained through art that is able to separate us from our perceptions of reality and reach a state of pure knowledge. In the Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche responds to this by agreeing with Schopenhauer’s philosophy in that art is the way to avoid suffering. He argues that the art capable of ending suffering is tragedy, which is a fusion of the Apollonian and the Dionysian.
Higher education, to me, is meant for learning about what life truly entails. It is to teach the student, not to find every answer in life, but to create more questions that will eventually need to be answered. Ronald Barnett wrote The Idea of Higher Education, in which Barnett wrote about how higher education, “is not complete unless the student realizes that, no matter how much effort is put in, or how much library research, there are no final answers”. Ronald Barnett’s intended meaning in his selection is to explain that higher education is not supposed to be just like secondary education. Higher education is supposed to destroy the student’s “taken-for-granted world” in which they had been raised and taught to know. First world students have been raised in a place where education is offered to almost everyone, where most people live with roofs over their heads, and have food in their bellies every night. Higher education reveals life and its hardships, and how it affects us and the people we are surrounded by. It shows the truth about the world, and uncovers the information that
Some may feel that what today’s students are reading about isn’t “educational enough” and that being politically correct is most important. However, I would argue that a student “who writes a sharply argued, sociologically acute analysis of an issue of Source over the student who writes a lifeless explication of Hamlet” (Graff, Gerald. Author, “Hidden Intellectualism” 386) offers much more interesting content. I firmly believe that engaging our youth with the desire to read is most important, as long as they are reading, whether it be comic books and Twitter blogs, or
Bradbury's point of view justifies that people need to realize books are important and need to be acknowledged. Books give us information we may not even think we need for our future selves, in reality we do need this information. "we all know the silly things we've done for a thousand years and as long as we know that and always have it around where we can see it, someday we'll stop making the funeral pyres and jumping in the middle of them we pick up a few more people that remember, every generation" (Lenhoff, 2). This passage suggests that the history of books can help us acknowledge what has happened in history and to not be making the same mistakes, to have a better outcome in the future. The information in books make people recognize what is in them and how it can help a person become someone better. "Books represent individualism, reason, and quality of information: they "show the pores in the face of life"" (Bradbury, 1).
Should students’ required reading in high school represent the real or the idea? Students deserve to represent the real, not the ideal in which most parents want them to believe life is normal. Meghan Cox Gurdon believes that the novels with gruesome details and storylines should not be in the reach of students. Janice Harayda also agreed with Ms. Gurdon, but Sherman Alexie did not agree with either one of them.
The possibilities are endless with the information available: encyclopedias, articles, books, magazines. Moreover, a reason I read, is for a source of enjoyment and entertainment. Every now and then I find a book that I can not take my eyes off of; freshman year I found a book that I loved so much, that I read all 300 pages in a matter of a day! Furthermore, reading may enhance vocabulary, advance writing skills, and improve analytical thinking. As author, Lana Winter-Hebert wrote, “should you ever find yourself in dire circumstances, remember that although you might lose everything else—your job, your possessions, your money, even your health—knowledge can never be taken from you” (Winter-Hebert). On the other hand, there are various of other thoughts about reading.
Literature is a gateway for people to expand their knowledge and learn new things. It gives us a sense of our self’s when we are able to travel to different places by just sitting in one place. But school boards and education leaders think that fiction will limit our
If the teacher gives the students the best text, the student can that the knowledge from the text and apply it to critical thinking. This is considered knowledge transformation (Hodges 2015). If the wrong kind of material is used to include Content Area Literacy in subjects, the students will be suck with knowledge retelling. This will show that the material was not completely grasped. When students are stuck in the retelling phase, they do not fully comprehend the materials and reason that the materials were given in general. When a text is broken down and explained in the best way, the students can go beyond the retelling stage and begin transforming the knowledge into deeper understanding of the content given and the subject areas as a
Going to school everyday, gathering facts on the internet, sitting in a classroom listening; these are all things that we call learning. But what is learning? Is learning the memorization of facts? Is it listening to a teacher lecture for an hour during class? Or is a process of digging through the facts and finding the information a person is seeking or the underlying truth? Many elementary school and high school students would argue that the first two examples of learning is all a person needs in life but as they grow and further their education they discover differently. When a person attends college the faculty expects you to be able to think critically and come to your own opinion about things. College professors desire you to question and to find the answers for yourself, bringing new life to a conversation that they have had again and again. Learning to them requires you to dig deep and find the deeper learning. But learning at its deepest is not as simple as it sounds. As McCullough (2008, p. 2) quoted Abigail Adams; “Learning is not attained by chance. It must be sought with ardor and attended with diligence.” Learning is the same as two hundred years ago with Abigail Adams, a person still must dig for facts and question the answers you are given; as Will Durant was quoted by Harold J. Morowitz (2009, p. 3) in his article Drinking Hemlock and Other Nutritional Matters about the Socratic method “prying into the human soul, uncovering assumptions and questioning certainties… ” is how a person can truly learn deeply. Some may ask how one might accomplish a feat such as this? Learning at its deepest level may be achieved by pursuing higher education, using new technology effectively, and truly reading great books.
If you allow yourself to become educated it is not only beneficial to yourself but also to other people and to the world. Like Plato says in the essay that if the prisoner who was let free comes back to the cave with the real truth of the world he would tell the others prisoners that the shadows are not the real truth. By receiving an education you are now able to see the world for what it really is. We don’t want to be all locked away in our own heads, where we can’t understand the real meanings of things, everyone should want to be educated.