Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of technology on education
Impacts of technology on education
The impact of technology on education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of technology on education
Going to school everyday, gathering facts on the internet, sitting in a classroom listening; these are all things that we call learning. But what is learning? Is learning the memorization of facts? Is it listening to a teacher lecture for an hour during class? Or is a process of digging through the facts and finding the information a person is seeking or the underlying truth? Many elementary school and high school students would argue that the first two examples of learning is all a person needs in life but as they grow and further their education they discover differently. When a person attends college the faculty expects you to be able to think critically and come to your own opinion about things. College professors desire you to question …show more content…
Mortimer J. Adler (1940) has a solution in his book How to Read a Book. Adler suggests that the only way to truly “absorb [the book] in your bloodstream” you must “write between the lines.” As a person actively reads a book and makes the book a part of themselves by holding a conversation with the author they are creating deeper thoughts that will lead to a deeper understanding (Adler). Sitting down and reading a book that is a physical thing and is in a person's hands demands attention a little more than a computer screen that has lights and pop-ups. If as you read and turn the pages a person also engages their brain this practice will help draw conclusions and obtain more insight that will last with you. Adler states, “To set down your reactions to important words and sentences you have read […] is to preserve those reactions and sharpen those questions.” When a person writes down the words not only helps with new insights but also helps the words of the book stay with you long after you close the cover. The learning also deepens overtime when you open up the book and there again is that conversation that is still unfinished between you and the …show more content…
(1940). How to Mark a Book. W. Brugger, D.Hammond, M.K. Hartvigsen, A. Papworth & R. Seamons (Eds.), The way of wisdom (pp.1-4). Rexburg, ID: BYU-Idaho. Retrieved October 1, 2011, from http://ilearn.byui,edu
Bednar, D. A. (2008). Learning to love learning. W. Brugger, D.Hammond, M.K. Hartvigsen, A. Papworth & R. Seamons (Eds.), The way of wisdom (pp.1-5). Rexburg, ID: BYU-Idaho. Retrieved October 1, 2011, from http://ilearn.byui,edu
Carr, N. (2008). Is Google Making Us Stupid? W. Brugger, D.Hammond, M.K. Hartvigsen, A. Papworth & R. Seamons (Eds.), The way of wisdom (pp.1-8). Rexburg, ID: BYU-Idaho. Retrieved October 2, 2011, from http://ilearn.byui,edu
McCullough, D. (2008). The Love of Learning. W. Brugger, D.Hammond, M.K. Hartvigsen, A. Papworth & R. Seamons (Eds.), The way of wisdom (pp.1-4). Rexburg, ID: BYU-Idaho. Retrieved September 30, 2011, from http://ilearn.byui,edu
Morowitz, H. (2009). Drinking Hemlock and Other Nutritional Matters. W. Brugger, D.Hammond, M.K. Hartvigsen, A. Papworth & R. Seamons (Eds.), The way of wisdom (pp.1-3). Rexburg, ID: BYU-Idaho. Retrieved September 30, 2011, from http://ilearn.byui,edu
Pinker, S. (2010, June 10). Mind over mass media. New York Times. Retrieved October 3, 2010 from
In Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” the reader finds all three methods of persuasion, ethos, pathos, and logos in emphasizing his point that Google is possibly making people stupid; but it is ultimately the people who cause their own mental deterioration. His persuasion is a reminder to people of the importance of falling back on the “traditional” ways of reading. He also understands that in skimming an article one has the ability to retain what is necessary. Carr himself points out that in the past he was better able to focus on what he read and retain the information. However, now he exercises the process of browsing and skimming over information, just as many individuals have come to do in this day and age.
Nicholas Carr, a periodic writer on issues such as technology and culture, wrote the article called “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” (743) In this, he discusses the way that not only Google, but also the advancement in technology, especially computers and computer engines is slowly altering our brain, along with the way we take in information. The process started back in the 1970’s and 1980’s when technology got a jump in society. For example “television was our medium of choice” says Carr (747). From then on it has been a slow decline for the way we process information. Throughout this essay Carr backs up the reasons why he feels the way by using different types of figurative language, deductive reasoning, plus the use of logical fallacies that can strengthen or may even weaken his argument.
Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?" Evolving Ideas. 2013-2014 ed. Plymouth: Hayden McNeil, 2013. 101-107. Print.
In Nicholas Carr 's article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” he discusses the effect that technology has on our brains as the world becomes more advanced. He gives examples of how technology has helped us and hurts us. Nicholas Carr tells about his own experiences with technology and others as well. In this paper, I will talk about the first part of Carr’s article, I will then agree with Nicholas Carr, give examples from his article, talk on his structure, sources, counterarguments or solutions, and end with why I agree with what he has said.
Nicholas Carr, an author who often writes about technology and culture issues, wrote the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”(313). Carr begins his essay with the iconic script from Dave and HAL at the end of 2001:A Space Odyssey. He nervously explains, “ Over the past few years I've had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain… I'm not thinking they way I used to think…” (313). Carr has found trouble focusing on reading, often becoming fidgety, he links this to his frequent Web use (314). Those around him are having similar experiences, Scott Karp, a blogger, writes, “ What if I do all my reading on the Web not so much because the way I read has changed, i.e. Im just seeking convenience, but because the way I think has
In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” First published in the Atlantic Monthly, July/August 2008, Nicolas Carr argues that Google, Internet in general, is changing our form of intelligence and the way we think. To support this argument Carr points to studies suggesting that people have been spending a lot of time for online, searching and surfing over a decade. Although the Author feel the benefit, it comes at a price. For instance, he mentions his trouble with reading to his acquaintances and friends, and he realizes that most of them are having the same problem. Besides, He illustrates that in the past, people could easily to read a long book, and spent a lot of time to looking for the information that they want by days, but the deep reading nowadays
Pinker, Steven. "Mind Over Mass Media." NYTimes.com. The New York Times, June 10, 2011. Web. 6 March 2012.
Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The New Humanities Reader. 4th Boston: Wadsworth, 2012. 67-74. Print
When Nicolas Carr uses the word “stupid” in his article titled “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he is conveying to the audience the growing dependence on the fast, convenient, and easy internet, where you can find any piece of research or information within a few clicks of a button. .He describes this dependency to be changing our mental habits by deteriorating our attention spans, hence, making us
From “How?, Who?, What?, Where?, Why?, When?” all our answers are at the tips of our fingers. The multitude of answers and resources Google reveals to us, allows our brain to expand our thoughts. Each new resource leads us to more intricate and deeper thought processes. At one click of a button, numerous pieces of information are in our presence. All the new knowledge we gain from each search enhances our intelligence. Carr addresses “Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes.”Google enables us to be more imaginative in moving toward issues and more coherent in our reasoning. This allows us to reason more creative thinking when generating an answer to our questions/problems. "I don't think having access to information can ever make anyone stupider.” Says Sandra Kelly, market researcher, 3M Corporation. “I would guess that smart people will use the Internet for smart things and stupid people will use it for stupid things in the same way that smart people read literature and stupid people read crap fiction.” She further states. Using Google is the gateway for a multitude of new ideas and approaches. Failure to use Google in an applicable, sensible, way, will, in fact, be a
I know this because of past experiences I have had with work from school. Reading a printed book may be boring but it tends to help more by keeping you on track of the information. Books have their own advantages and disadvantages, from needing to carry piles of books rather than just one device, also the entertainment level could be not as impressive since it has nothing else other than text and sometimes images. This helped me keep my concentration on the book, but it tends to be boring most of the times. There are different types of texts that we all react differently
Carr, Nicholas. "Is Google Making Us Stupid? - Magazine - The Atlantic." The Atlantic — News and Analysis on Politics, Business, Culture, Technology, National, International, and Life – TheAtlantic.com. Atlantic Monthly Group, July-Aug. 2008. Web. 14 Nov. 2011. .
Rather than being a neutral conduit for the communication of information, the U.S. media plays an intricate role in shaping and controlling political opinions. Media is extremely powerful in the sense that without an adequate functioning media, it is virtually impossible for a sophisticated social structure like the U.S. Government to exist. Henceforth, all known sophisticated social structure, have always dependent upon the media’s ability to socialize. The U.S. government generally will exploit the media, often times manipulating the enormous power of the printed word. Ultimately empowering the U.S. government, strengthening it with the ability to determine and control the popular perception of reality. One way in which government achieves this objective, is by its ability to misuse the media’s ability to set the agenda. Contrary to popular belief, media is in fact an enormous hegemony. In fact, separate independent news organizations relatively do not exist. Rather than creating an independent structured agenda of there own, generally lesser smaller news organizations adapt to a prepared agenda, previously constructed by a higher medium. Based upon this information alone, it is quite apparent that media functions in adherence to the characteristics of a hierarchy. This simply means that media is structured in a way that it operates functioning from top to bottom. This is also identical to the hierarchical nature of the human body, in that from the commands of the brain transferred through the central nervous system, the body responds accordingly. In order for the U.S. government to control and determine the public’s popular perception of reality, the government must shape and oversee the information that the media reports to the existing populous. This particular process of democracy is known and referred to by political scientists as cognitive socialization. However, many of us, who do not adhere to the cushioning of political correctness, refer to it as the propaganda machine. Numerous political scientists consider cognitive socialization to be the most effective form of political socialization. According to theory, cognitive socialization is doctored up information, which is strategically fragmented in such a manipulative manner, that the probability of its rationalization is highly predictable. The manipulative properties of cognitive socialization are so diabolical and Machiavellian in nature, that I consider it to be the ultimate perversion of the democratic process. In all seriousness, numerous intellectuals, and gentleman held in good stature agree, that cognitive socialization is the product of an evil genius.
Undoubtedly, Google is the most popular search engine in the world. It may appear that the abundance of data Google provides can only expand the intelligence of a person. However, the service is only impairing the human brain when used improperly. This incorrect use of Google is capable of doing much more damage then the majority of the population would expect.
Life is full of learning, and learning is full of life. The definition of learning is simply acquiring more knowledge or new information. The brain is designed to process and hold information. Everyone has the ability to learn, it is not only for “smart people.” An individual is smart because of what he or she learns. A person is transformed by the learning process, not for worse, but for the better. Fulfilling one’s true potential is acquired through learning. It allows people to find their niche. They find their area of expertise through learning. When someone finds a love for learning, they find enjoyment in life. Learning leads to a better life by benefitting humanities physically, technologically, and socially.